This paper introduces innovations in shelter programmes currently emerging in the global South. The paper discusses the evolution of a new approach aimed at reaching some of the lowest-income groups. This approach is placed within its historical and ideological context through a review of previous efforts and an analysis of present shelter programmes. While the new approach has aspects that appear to be consistent with neo-liberal economic policy, in practice there is a significant role for the state to enable greater inclusion through the provision of subsidies and greater affordability within an appropriate regulatory framework.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngelS. (2000) Housing Policy Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AphimeteetamrongV.KritayanavajB. (1998) Integrating housing finance and capital markets in Thailand, in: WatanabeM. (Ed.) New Directions in Asian Housing Finance, pp. 221–235. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
3.
AppaduraiA. (2004) The capacity to aspire: culture and the terms of recognition, in: RaoV.WaltonM. (Eds) Culture and Public Action, pp. 61–84. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
ArrossiS.BombaroloF.HardoyJ.. (1994) Funding Community Initiatives. London: Earthscan.
5.
Asian Coalition for Housing Rights (2008) Community finance: news from Asia and Africa. Working Paper No. 19, Poverty Reduction in Urban Areas Series, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
6.
BaumannT. (2003) Harnessing people’s power: policy makers’ options for scaling up the delivery of housing subsidies via the People’s Housing Process. Occasional Paper No. 10, Housing Finance Resource Programme, Johannesburg, South Africa.
7.
BondP. (1996) Debate, Southern Africa Report, 11(4), pp. 25–29.
8.
BoonyabanchaS. (2004) A decade of change: from the Urban Community Development Office to the Community Organization Development Institute in Thailand, in: MitlinD.SatterthwaiteD. (Eds) Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction, pp. 25–53. London: Earthscan.
9.
BoonyabanchaS. (2005) Baan Mankong: going to scale with squatter and slum upgrading in Thailand, Environment and Urbanization, 17(1), pp. 21–46.
10.
BuckleyB.KalarickalJ. (2006) Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: what have we learnt?World Bank, Washington, DC.
11.
BurgessR. (1978) Petty commodity housing or dweller control? A critique of John Turner’s views on housing policy, World Development, 6(9/10), pp. 1105–1103.
12.
CainA. (2007) Housing micro-finance in post-colonial Angola, Environment and Urbanization, 19(2), pp. 361–390.
13.
CGAP (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor) (2004) Housing microfinance. Donor Brief No. 20, CGAP, Washington, DC.
14.
ChanK. W. (2000) Prosperity or inequality: deconstructing the myth of home ownership in Hong Kong, Housing Studies, 15(1), pp. 29–44.
15.
CHF International (2004) Strategic assessment of the affordable housing sector in Ghana. CHF International, Silver Spring, MD (mimeograph).
16.
Chin BengY. (2002) The experience of Singapore in financing housing for the middle and low-income groups. International Conference on Social Housing, Baotou.
17.
ChiquierL.HasslerO.LeaM. (2004) Mortgage securities in emerging markets. Working Paper No. 3370, World Bank Policy Research Series, Washington, DC.
18.
COHRE (Centre for Housing Rights and Evictions) (2006) Global survey on forced evictions: violations of human rights 2003–2006. COHRE, Geneva.
ConnollyP. (2004) The Mexican national popular housing fund, in: MitlinD.SatterthwaiteD. (Eds) Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction, pp. 82–111. London: Earthscan.
21.
CruzC. (2004) Securitization of mortgage portfolios in Latin America: the Chilean case, Housing Finance International, March, pp. 15–20.
22.
CummingsJ.DiPasqualeD. (1997) The spatial implications of housing policy in Chile. City Research, Boston, MA (mimeograph).
23.
DaphnisF.FergusonB. (Eds) (2004) Housing Micro-finance: A Guide to Practice. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press Ltd.
24.
D’CruzC.SatterthwaiteD. (2005) Building homes, changing official approaches: the work of urban poor federations and their contributions to meeting the millennium development goals in urban areas. Working Paper No. 16: International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
25.
EscobarA. (2004) Beyond the Third World: imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalization social movements, Third World Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 207–230.
26.
FergusonB. (1999) Micro-finance of housing: a key to housing the low or moderate income majority?, Environment and Urbanization, 11(1), pp. 185–200.
27.
GilbertA. (2002a) On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto, International Development Planning Review, 24(1), pp. 1–19.
28.
GilbertA. (2002b) Power, ideology and the Washington consensus: the development and spread of Chilean housing policy, Housing Studies, 17(2), pp. 305–324.
29.
GilbertA. (2004) Helping the poor through housing subsidies: lessons from Chile, Colombia and South Africa, Habitat International, 28, pp. 13–40.
30.
Government of Tanzania and UN-Habitat (2003) Re-establishing effective housing finance mechanisms in Tanzania: the potentials and the bottlenecks. Report No. HS/694/03E, United Nations Human Settlement Programme, Nairobi.
31.
GulyaniS.TalukdarD.PotterC. (2006) Inside informality: poverty, jobs, housing and services in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Report No. 36347-KE, World Bank, Nairobi.
32.
HardoyJ. E.SatterthwaiteD. (1989) Squatter Citizen: Life in the Urban Third World. London: Earthscan.
33.
HasanA. (1990) Community organizations and non-government organizations in the urban field in Pakistan, Environment and Urbanization, 2(1), pp. 74–86.
34.
HasanA. (2002) The Unplanned Revolution: Observations on the Process of Socio-economic Change in Pakistan. Karachi: City Press.
35.
HirschmanA. O. (1984) Getting Ahead Collectively: Grassroots Experiences in Latin America. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
36.
HoM. H. C. (2004) Privatization of public housing in Hong Kong: a genuine agenda or propaganda?, Habitat International, 28, pp. 481–494.
37.
HuchzermeyerM. (2003) A legacy of control? The capital subsidy for housing, and informal settlement intervention in South Africa, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), pp. 591–612.
38.
HuchzermeyerM. (2007) Tenement city: the emergence of multi-storey districts through large-scale private landlordism in Nairobi, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), pp. 714–732.
39.
HulmeD.MosleyP. (1996) Finance against Poverty. London: Routledge.
40.
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2006) Sharpening the Bank’s capacity to support the housing sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: background paper for the implementation of the social development strategy. IDB, Washington, DC.
41.
JironM.FaddaG. (2003) A quality of life assessment to improve urban and housing policies in Chile. Paper presented to the World Bank Urban Research Symposium, Washington, DC.
42.
JonesG.MitlinD. (1999) Housing finance and non-governmental organizations in developing countries, in: JonesG.DattaK. (Eds) Housing and Finance in Developing Countries, pp. 26–43. London: Routledge.
43.
KalabamuF. T. (2006) The limitations of state regulation of land delivery processes in Gaborone, Botswana, International Development Planning Review, 28(2), pp. 209–233.
44.
KhanF.PieterseE. (2006) The homeless people’s alliance: purposive creation and ambiguated realities, in: BallardR.HabibA.ValodiaI. (Eds) Voices of Protest: Social Movements in Post-apartheid South Africa, pp. 23–44. Durban: University of KwaZulu Press.
45.
LallS. V.SuriA.DeichmannU. (2006) Housing savings and residential mobility in informal settlements in Bhopal, India, Urban Studies, 43(7), pp. 1025–1039.
46.
LeaM. (2000) The role of the primary mortgage market in the development of a successful secondary mortgage market. Technical Papers Series, Sustainable Development Department, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.
47.
LeeJ. (2003) Mortgage securitization in Korea, Housing Finance International, March, pp. 24–30.
48.
LeeJ.LeeS. (1998) Restructuring the housing finance system and broadening the linkage with capital markets in the Republic of Korea, in: WatanabeM. (Ed.) New Directions in Asian Housing Finance, pp. 157–183. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
49.
van der LindenJ. (1997) On popular participation in a culture of patronage: patrons and grass roots organizations in a sites and services project in Hyderabad, Pakistan, Environment and Urbanization, 9(1), pp. 81–90.
50.
LlantoG. (2007) Shelter finance strategies for the poor: the Philippines, Environment and Urbanization, 19(2), pp. 409–425.
51.
MacFarlaneC. (2004) Geographical imaginations and spaces of political engagement: examples from the Indian Alliance, Antipode, 36(5), pp. 890–916.
52.
MalhotraM. (2003) Financing her home, one wall at a time, Environment and Urbanization, 15(2), pp. 217–228.
53.
MandaM. A. Z. (2007) Mchenga-Urban Poor Housing Fund: CCODE and Homeless People’s Federation in Malawi, Environment and Urbanization, 19(2), pp. 337–360.
54.
MillsS. (2007) The Kuyasa Fund: housing microcredit in South Africa, Environment and Urbanization, 19(2), pp. 457–471.
55.
MitlinD. (2008) Urban poor funds: development by the people, for the people. Working Paper No. 18, IIED Poverty Reduction in Urban Areas, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
56.
MitlinD.SatterthwaiteD. (Eds) (2004) Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction. London: Earthscan.
57.
MooreM. (2003) Arguing the politics of inclusion, in: HoutzagerP.MooreM. (Eds) Changing Paths: International Development and the New Politics of Inclusion, pp. 261–284. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
58.
NdeziT. (2009) The limit of community initiatives in addressing resettlement in Kurasina ward, Tanzania, Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), pp. 77–88.
59.
van OrderR. (2001) The structure and evolution of American secondary mortgage markets, with some implications for developing markets, Housing Finance International, September, pp. 16–31.
60.
PatelS.D’CruzC. (1993) The Mahila Milan crisis credit scheme: from a seed to a tree, Environment and Urbanization, 5(1), pp. 9–17.
61.
PeattieL. (1990) Participation: a case study of how invaders organize, negotiate and interact with government in Lima, Peru, Environment and Urbanization, 2(1), pp. 19–30.
62.
PorioE.CrisolC. S.MagnoN. F.. (2004) The community mortgage programme: an innovative social housing programme in the Philippines and its outcomes, in: MitlinD.SatterthwaiteD. (Eds) Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction, pp. 54–81. London: Earthscan.
63.
PornchokchaiS. (1992) Bangkok slums:review and recommendations. Agency for Real Estate Affairs, School of Urban Community Research and Actions, Bangkok.
64.
PorteousD. (2005) Setting the context: South Africa, Housing Finance International, September, pp. 34–39.
65.
RakodiC. (1997) Residential property markets in African cities, in: RakodiC. (Ed.) The Urban Challenge in Africa: Growth and Management of its Large Cities, pp. 371–410. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
66.
RakodiC. (2006) Social agency and state authority in land delivery processes in five African cities, International Development Planning Review, 28(2), pp. 263–285.
67.
RakodiC.LedukaC. R. (2003) Informal land delivery processes and access to land for the poor: a comparative study of six African Cities. Policy Brief No. 6, International Development Department, Birmingham University.
68.
RBI (Reserve Bank of India) (2006) Report on trend and progress in banking in India 2005–06. RBI, November (www.rbi.org.in).
69.
Republic of Liberia (2008) Liberia poverty reduction strategy. Republic of Liberia.
70.
RodríguezA.SugranyesA. (2007) The new housing problem in Latin America, in: CarrionE.HanleyL. M. (Eds) Urban Regeneration and Revitalization in the Americas: Towards a Stable State, pp. 51–65. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
71.
RoyA. (2004) The gentleman’s city: urban informality in the Calcutta of new communism, in: RoyA.AlwayyadN. (Eds) Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia, pp. 271–289. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
SmetsP. (2002) Indian housing alliances and the urban poor, Global Built Environment Review, 2(1) pp. 58–66.
76.
SteinA.VanceI. (2008) The role of housing finance in addressing the needs of the urban poor: lessons from Central America, Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), pp. 13–30.
77.
SundgrenH. (2003) Globalization urban trends, mega city and development of informal settlements: a case study of ‘illegal’ housing market in favela Rio de Janeiro. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (mimeograph).
78.
TillyC. (2004) Social Movements 1768–2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
79.
TorresH.AlvesH.Aparecida de OliveiraM. (2007) São Paulo peri-urban dynamics: some social causes and environmental consequences, Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), pp. 207–225.
80.
TurnerJ. (1976) Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. London: Marion Boyars.
81.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2003) The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements 2003. London: Earthscan.
82.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2005) Financing Urban Shelter: Global Report on Human Settlements 2005. London: Earthscan.
83.
ValençaM. M. (2007) Poor politics—poor housing: policy under the Collar government in Brazil (1990–92), Environment and Urbanization, 19(2), pp. 391–408.
84.
WatanabeM. (Ed.) (1998) New Directions in Asian Housing Finance: Linking Capital Markets and Housing Finance. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
85.
WoodG. (2003) Staying secure, staying poor: the ‘Faustian bargain’, World Development, 31(3), pp. 455–471.
86.
World Bank (1990) World Development Report 1990. Washington, DC: World Bank.
87.
World Bank (2004) IBRD program document for a proposed programmatic loan to the amount of US $100 million to the United Mexican States for affordable housing and urban poverty sector adjustment loan. Report No. 27627-MX, World BankWashington, DC.
88.
YahyaS.AgevE.LowL.. (2001) Double Standards, Single Purpose: Reforming Housing Regulations to Reduce Poverty. London: ITDG Publications.
