The rising focus of politicians as well as scientists in the EU on the large urban agglomerations as centres of economic growth is accompanied by political efforts to identify and to demarcate such agglomerations under the label ‘metropolitan regions’. This study develops a theoretical framework broaching the issue of cooperation between municipalities from the perspective of regional economics as well as political science. The framework is applied to the empirical case of the polycentric metropolitan region of the ‘Saxony triangle’ in east Germany. The results show that various intervening factors prevent intense co-operation between the actors in the region. Policy implications and conclusions for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benz, A. ( 2001) From associations of local governments to ‘regional governance’ in urban regions, German Journal of Urban Studies, 40(2), pp. 55-71 (http://www.difu.de/index.shtml?/publikationen/dfk/en/01_2; accessed 28 July 2009).
2.
Blotevogel, H.H. ( 2002) Deutsche Metropolregionen in der Vernetzung, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 6/7, pp. 345-351.
3.
Blotevogel, H.H. and Schmitt, P. ( 2006) ‘European metropolitan regions’ as a new discursive frame in strategic spatial planning and policies in Germany, Die Erde, 137, pp. 55-74.
4.
Camagni, R. and Salone, C. ( 1993) Network urban structures in northern Italy: elements for a theoretical framework, Urban Studies, 30, pp. 1053-1064.
5.
Cantner, U. and Graf, H. ( 2004) Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions , Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), pp. 543-562.
6.
Capello, R. and Rietveld, P. (1998) The concept of network synergies in economic theory: policy implications, in: K. Button, P. Nijkamp and H. Priemus (Eds) Transport Networks in Europe, pp. 57-83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7.
Capineri, C. and Kamann, D. ( 1998) Synergy in networks, in: K. Button, P. Nijkamp and H. Priemus (Eds) Transport Networks in Europe , pp. 35-56. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
8.
Cheshire, P.C. and Gordon, I.R. ( 1996) Territorial competition and the predictability of collective (in)action, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 20, pp. 383-399.
9.
Cheshire, P.C. and Magrini, S.(2009) Urban growth drivers in a Europe of sticky people and implicit boundaries , Journal of Economic Geography, 9, pp. 85-115.
Davoudi, S. ( 2003) Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda, European Planning Studies, 11(8), pp. 979-999.
12.
Espon (2006) Territory matters for competitiveness and cohesion: facets of regional diversity and potentials in Europe. ESPON Synthesis ReportIII, Luxemburg.
13.
Franz, P. ( 2007) Spatial distribution of East German innovative competencies: significant increase in the southwestern hinterland of Berlin and in the centres of Saxony and Thuringia, Economy in Change, 13, pp. 344-349.
14.
Franz, P. ( 2008) From university town to knowledge city: strategies and regulatory hurdles in Germany, in: T. Yigitcanlar , K. Velibeyoglu and S. Baum (Eds) Knowledge-based Urban Development: Planning and Applications in the Information Era, pp. 101-115. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
15.
Frey, R.L. and Zimmermann, H. ( 2005) Neue Rahmenbedingungen für die Raumordnung als Chance für marktwirtschaftliche Instrumente, disP, 161(2), pp. 5-18 ( http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/index.php/content/view/full/1044/; accessed 2 September 2009).
16.
Friedmann, J. ( 1986) The world city hypothesis, Development and Change, 17, pp. 69-84.
17.
Fritsch, M. and Brixy, U. ( 2004) The establishment file of the German social insurance statistic, Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 124, pp. 183-190.
18.
German Patent and Trademark Office (Ed.) (2006) PatentatlasDeutschland: Regionaldaten der Erfindungstätigkeit. Munich.
19.
Göddecke-Stellmann, J., Porsche, L. and Schmidt-Seiwert, V. ( 2005) Den Blick schärfen: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme des Konzepts der funktionalen Stadtregionen im ESPON-Programm, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 7, pp. 457-464.
20.
Green, N. ( 2007) Functional polycentricity: a formal definition in terms of social network analysis, Urban Studies, 44, pp. 2077-2103.
21.
Hall, P. and Pain, K. (Eds) (2006) The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-city Regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
22.
Herrschel, T. and Newman, P. ( 2002) Governance of Europe’s City Regions. London: Routledge.
23.
Kloosterman, R.C. and Lambregts, B. ( 2001) Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: the case of the Randstad, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 717-732.
24.
Knieling, J., Rahlf, S., Hanebeck, K. et al. (2007) Metropolregionen: Chancen der Raumentwicklung durch Polyzentralität und regionale Kooperation. Working Paper No. 54, Bonn.
25.
KoRiS, HalleInstitute for Economic Research and the Technical University Dresden (2005) Metropolregion Halle/Leipzig-Sachsendreieck . Handlungskonzept, Hannover (http://www.region-sachsendreieck.de/imperia/md/content/metropolregionsachsendreieck/service/handlungskonzept_metropolregion.pdf ; acessed 28 January 2009).
26.
Krätke, S. ( 2007) Metropolisation of the European economic territory as a consequence of increasing specialisation of urban agglomerations in the knowledge economy, European Planning Studies, 15, pp. 1-27.
27.
Lambooy, J.G. ( 1998) Polynucleation and economic development: the Randstad , European Planning Studies, 6, pp. 457-466.
28.
Luftverkehrskonzept (2006) Luftverkehrskonzept für Mitteldeutschland, Leipzig [agreement by the governments of Saxony-Anhalt, Saxony and Thuringia] (http://www.smwa.sachsen.de/set/431/luftverkehrskonzept_2006.pdf ; accessed 27 July 2009).
29.
Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics, 8th edn. London: Macmillan.
30.
Meijers, E. ( 2005) Polycentric regions and the quest for synergy: is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts?, Urban Studies, 42, pp. 765-781.
31.
Meijers, E. ( 2006) The notion of complementarity in urban networks: definition, value, measurement and development. Paper presented at the 10th UNECE Conference on Urban and Regional Research, Bratislava, May.
32.
Meijers, E. ( 2007) Synergy in Polycentric Urban Regions: Complementarity, Organising Capacity and Critical Mass. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
33.
Meijers, E. ( 2008) Summing small cities does not make a large city: polycentric urban regions and the provision of cultural, leisure and sports amenities, Urban Studies, 45, pp. 2323-2342.
34.
Meijers, E. and Romein, A. ( 2003) Realizing potential: building regional organizing capacity in polycentric urban regions, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, pp. 173-186.
35.
Meijers, E., Hoekstra, J. and Aguado, R. ( 2008) The Basque city network: an empirical analysis and policy recommendations. Paper presented at the EUNIP International Conference, San Sebastian, September.
36.
Metrex (Ed.) (2005) Towards a polycentric metropolitan Europe. PolyMETREX Interim Report , Glasgow.
37.
Parr, J.B. ( 2004) The polycentric urban region: a closer inspection, Regional Studies, 38(3), pp. 231-240.
38.
Schwartz, M. and Hornych, C. ( 2008) Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the central German multimedia center, Technovation , 28(7), pp. 436-449.
39.
Short, J.R., Kim, Y., Kuus, M. and Wells, H. ( 1996) The dirty little secret of world cities research: data problems in comparative analysis, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, pp. 697-717.
40.
Sinz, M. ( 2005) Einführung, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung , 7, pp. i-v.
41.
Turok, I. and Bailey, N. ( 2004) The theory of polynuclear urban regions and its application to central Scotland, European Planning Studies, 12, pp. 371-389.
42.
Weber, A. ( 1909) Über den Standort der Industrien. Tübingen: Mohr.
