India’s cities are characterised by strong land use controls, but their impacts on city growth and the urban poor have drawn little attention. This paper deals with strong land use regulations prevalent in India’s cities, which have negative impacts on urban form, the consumption of floor space and affordable housing. The impact of land use controls, such as floor area ratio and urban land ceiling, on suburbanisation in India is studied using standard econometric techniques. It is found that population suburbanises in response to a relaxation of floor area ratio norms in the suburbs. However, land use controls have no impact on the suburbanisation of jobs in India’s cities. The paper concludes by summarising policy implications of the research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benjamin, S. ( 2001) Globalization’s impact on local government, UN Habitat Debate, 7(4), p. 25.
2.
Bertaud, A. (2002) Bangalore and Karnataka: note on land issues. November ( http://alain-bertaud.com/#C.%20Asian%20Cities).
3.
Bertaud, A. (2004) Mumbai FSI conundrum: the perfect storm: the four factors restricting the construction of new floor space in Mumbai (http://alain-bertaud.com/AB_Files/AB_Mumbai_FSI_conundrum.pdf; 10 August 2006).
4.
Bertaud, A. and Brueckner, J. (2003) Real estate markets in Mumbai: a case of topographical constraints worsened by public policies. World Bank, April.
5.
Bertaud, A. and Malpezzi, S. ( 2003) The spatial distribution of population in 48 world cities: implications for economies in transition. Draft manuscript, December (http://alain-bertaud.com/AB_Files/Spatia_%20Distribution_of_Pop_%2050_%20Cities.pdf ).
6.
Brueckner, J. ( 2007) Government land-use interventions: an economic analysis . Paper presented at the 4th Urban Research Symposium , World Bank, Washington, DC (http://www.worldbank.org).
7.
Chakravorty, S. ( 2000) From colonial city to global city? The far-from-complete spatial transformation of Calcutta, in: P. Marcuse and R. van Kempen (Eds) Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order?, pp. 56-77. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Chatterji-Mitra, B. ( 1990) Land supply for low-income housing in Delhi, in: R. Baróss and J. van der Linden (Eds) The Transformation of Land Supply Systems in Third World Cities, pp. 193-224. Aldershot: Avebury.
9.
Jain, M.K. ( 1993) Emerging trend of suburbanisation in India, 1971-81: an analysis of data on standard urban areas. Occasional Paper No. 2, Census of India, Registrar General of India, New Delhi .
10.
Joshi, V. and Little, I.M.D. ( 1991) India’s Economic Reforms: 1991-2001. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Macauley, M.K. ( 1985) Estimation and recent behaviour of urban population and employment density gradients, Journal of Urban Economics, 18, pp. 251-260.
12.
Margo, R. ( 1992) Explaining the postwar suburbanization of population in the United States: the role of income, Journal of Urban Economics , 31, pp. 301-310.
13.
McDonald, J.F. ( 1997) Fundamentals of Urban Economics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
McDonald, J.F. and McMillen, D. ( 2003) Costs and benefits of land use regulations: a theoretical survey, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 11(2), pp. 157-175.
15.
Mieszkowski, P. and Mills, E.S. ( 1993) The causes of metropolitan suburbanization, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, pp. 135-147.
16.
Mills, E.S. ( 1992) The measurement and determinants of suburbanization, Journal of Urban Economics, 32, pp. 377-387.
17.
Mills, E.S. and Ohta, K. ( 1976) Urbanization and urban problems, in: H. Patrick and H. Rosovsky (Eds) Asia’s New Giant: How the Japanese Economy Works. Washington, DC: The Brookings Instiution.
18.
Mills, E.S. and Price, R. ( 1984) Metropolitan suburbanization and central city problems , Journal of Urban Economics, 15, pp. 1-17.
19.
Partridge, M. and Rickman, D. ( 2003) The waxing and waning of regional economies: the chicken-egg question of jobs versus people, Journal of Urban Economics , 53, pp. 76-97.
20.
Phatak, V.K. ( 2002/03) The use of FSI in development of land and housing markets in Mumbai, The City, (Bombay First, Mumbai), 1(December/January).
21.
Savage, D. and Dasgupta, S. ( 2006) Governance framework for delivery of urban services, in: 3i Network (Ed.) India Infrastructure Report 2006: Urban Infrastructure, pp. 42-58. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
22.
Small, K. and Song, S. ( 1994) Population and employment densities: structure and change , Journal of Urban Economics, 36, pp. 292-313.
23.
Sridhar, K.S. ( 2004) Cities with suburbs: evidence from India. Working Paper No. 23/2004, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (http://www.nipfp.org.in/workingpaper/wp23.pdf ).
24.
Sridhar, K.S. ( 2007) Density gradients and their determinants: evidence from India, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(3), pp. 314-344.
25.
TCPO (Town and Country Planning Organisation) ( 1999) A study on planning norms, building bye-laws, tariff structure, land assembly and resource mobilization (of nine metropolitan cities). Ministry of Urban Development and Poverty Alleviation, New Delhi.
