Since 2001, there has been a radical shift in the governance of urban land and housing markets in Turkey from a ‘populist’ to a ‘neo-liberal’ mode. Large ‘urban transformation projects’ (UTPs) are the main mechanisms through which a neo-liberal system is instituted in incompletely commodified urban areas. By analysing two UTPs implemented in an informal housing zone and an inner-city slum in Istanbul, the paper discusses the motivations behind, the socioeconomic consequences of and grassroots resistance movements to the new urban regime. The analysis shows that the UTPs predominantly aim at physical and demographic upgrading of their respective areas rather than improving the living conditions of existing inhabitants, thus instigating a process of property transfer and displacement. It also demonstrates that the property/ tenure structure of an area plays the most important role in determining the form and effectiveness of grassroots movements against the UTPs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akar, R. and Demir, H. ( 1994) İstanbul’un Son Sürgünleri. Istanbul: Iletişim.
2.
Atayurt, U. and Kuyucu, T. ( 2008) Başıbüyük Direniyor!, Express, May, pp. 36-41.
3.
Bartu-Candan, A. and Kolluoğlu, B. ( 2008) Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: a gated town and public housing project in Istanbul, New Perspectives on Turkey, 39, pp. 5-46.
4.
Başlevent, C. and Dayıoğlu, M. ( 2005) The effect of squatter housing on ıncome distribution in urban Turkey, Urban Studies, 42(1), pp. 31-45.
5.
Behar, D. and I slam, T. (2006) İstanbul’da Soylulaştırma: EskiKentin Yeni Sahipleri. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
6.
Bezmez, D. ( 2008) The politics of waterfront regeneration: the case of Haliç (Golden Horn), Istanbul, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), pp. 815-840.
7.
Blomley, N. (2004) Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.
8.
Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. ( 2002) Cities and territories of actually existing neoliberalism , Antipode, 34(3), pp. 349-379.
9.
Buğra, A. ( 1998) The Immoral Economy of Housing in Turkey, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(2), pp. 282-302.
10.
Burkay, H.Ö. (2006) Social policy of urban transformation: social housing policies in Turkey from the 1980’s to present. Unpublished MA thesis, Bosphorus University.
11.
Castells, M. ( 1983) The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
Çeçener, B. ( 1995) Istanbul’un Kültür ve Imar Sorunları . Istanbul: Mimarlar Odası Istanbul Büyükkent Şubesi.
13.
Cizre, Ü. and Yeldan, E. ( 2005) The Turkish encounter with neoliberalism: economics and politics in the 2000/2001 crises, Review of International Political Economy, 12(3), pp. 387-408.
14.
Davis, M. ( 2006) Planet of Slums. New York: Verso.
15.
Dündar, Ö. ( 2001) Models of urban transformation: informal housing in Ankara , Cities, 18(6), pp. 391-401.
16.
Eckstein, S. ( 1990) Poor people versus the state and capital: anatomy of a successful community mobilization for housing in Mexico City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14(2), pp. 274-296.
17.
Ekinci, O. ( 1994) Istanbul’u Sarsan On Yıl. Istanbul: Anahtar Kitaplar.
18.
Erder, S. ( 1996) Istanbul’a Bir Kent Kondu: Ümraniye. Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları .
19.
Fainstein, S. ( 2008) Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), pp. 768-785.
20.
Fernandes, E. and Varley, A. (Eds) (1998) Illegal Cities: Law and Urban Change in Developing Countries. London: Zed Books.
21.
Geniş, Ş. ( 2007) Producing élite localities: the rise of gated communities in Istanbul, Urban Studies, 44(4), pp. 771-798.
22.
Gilbert, A. and Gugler, J. ( 1982) Cities, Poverty, and Development: Urbanization in the Third World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
Gülöksüz, E. ( 2002) Negotiation of property rights in urban land in Istanbul , International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), pp. 462-476.
Güvenç, M. ( 2005) 1990-2000 Istanbul Haritaları. Unpublished research project, Istanbul Bilgi University.
26.
Hackworth, J. ( 2007) The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Harvey, D. ( 1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, Geographiska Annaler Series B, 71, pp. 3-18.
28.
Işık, O. and Pınarcıoğlu, M. (2002) Nöbetleşe Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve Kent Yoksulları-Sultanbeyli Örneği. Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları.
29.
Istanbul Beyoğlu Municipality ( 2008) 50 Soruda Tarlabaşı Yenileme Projesi. Istanbul Beyoğlu Municipality, Istanbul .
30.
Kentsel Strateji A.Ş. ( 2008) Tarlabaşı Stratejik Sosyal Plan 2008-2010 . Unpublished research report.
31.
Keyder, Ç. ( 2000) Liberalization from above and the future of the informal sector: land, shelter, and informality in the periphery, in: F. Tabak and M. Crichlow (Eds) Informalization: Process and Structure, pp. 119-132. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Keyder, Ç. and Öncü, A. ( 1994) Globalization of a third world metropolis: Istanbul in the 1980s, Review, 17(3), pp. 383-421.
33.
Knox, P. L. and Taylor, P. J. (Eds) (1995) World Cities in a World System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Lehrer, U. and Laidley, J. ( 2008) Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 32(4), pp. 786-803.
35.
Leitner, H., Peck, J. and Sheppard, E. S. (Eds) ( 2007) Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers. New York: The Guilford Press.
36.
Logan, J.R. and Molotch, H. ( 1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
Miraftab, F. ( 2004) Public-private partnerships: the trojan horse of neoliberal development?, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(1), pp. 89-101.
38.
Moulaert, F., Rodriguez, A. and Swyngedouw, E. (Eds) (2003) The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Nappi-Choulet, I. ( 2006) The role and behavior of commercial property investors and developers in French urban regeneration: the experience of the Paris region , Urban Studies, 43(9), pp. 1511-1535.
40.
Öktem, B. (2005) Küresel Kent Söyleminin Kentsel Mekanı Dönüştürmedeki Rolü: Büyükdere-Maslak Aksı, in: H. Kurtluluş (Ed.) Istanbul’da Kentsel Ayrışma: Mekansal Dönüşümde Farklı Boyutlar, pp. 25-76. Istanbul: Bağlam Yayınları.
41.
Öncü, A. ( 1988) The politics of urban land market in Turkey: 1950-1980 , International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(1), pp. 38-64.
42.
Öniş, Z. ( 1991) Political economy of Turkey in the 1980s: anatomy of unorthodox liberalism, in: Heper, M. (Ed.) Strong State and Economic Interest Groups: The Post-1980 Turkish Experience . New York: Walter de Gruyter.
43.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A. ( 2002) Neoliberalizing space, Antipode, 34(3), pp. 380-404.
44.
Roy, A. ( 2004) The gentlemen’s city: urban informality in the Calcutta of new communism, in: A. Roy and N. AlSayyad (Eds) Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia, pp. 147-170. Oxford : Lexington Books.
45.
Sajor, E. ( 2003) Globalization and the urban property boom in Metro Cebu , Philippines, Development and Change, 34(4), pp. 713-741.
46.
Sassen, S. ( 2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Şenyapılı, T. (2000) Enformel Sektör: Durağanlıktan Devingenliğe-Gecekondulaşmadan Apartmanlaşmaya , in: A. H. Akder and M. Güvenç (Eds) Yoksulluk: Bölgesel Gelişme ve Kırsal Yoksulluk, Kent Yoksulluğu, pp. 164-165. Istanbul: TESEV.
48.
Smith, N. ( 2002) New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy, Antipode, 34(3), pp. 427-451.
49.
Tekeli, I. . (1992) Development of urban administration and planning in the formation of Istanbul metropolitan area, in: I. Tekeli (Ed.) Development of Istanbul Metropolitan Area and Low Cost Housing. Istanbul: TSBD (Turkish Social Science Association).
50.
Thirkell, A.J. ( 1996) Players in urban informal markets; who wins? who loses? A case study of Cebu city, Environment and Urbanization, 8(2), pp. 71-90.
51.
TURKSTAT (Turkish Statistics Institute) (2000 ) Bina Sayım Istatistikleri. Ankara.
52.
Turkstat (2004) Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi. Ankara.
53.
Turkstat (2008) Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Sayımı Sonuçları. Ankara.
54.
Weber, R. ( 2002) Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment, Antipode, 34(3), pp. 519-541.
55.
Yükseker, D. ( 2007) Shuttling goods, weaving consumer tastes: informal trade between Turkey and Russia, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), pp. 60-72.
