Smart growth proponents suggest that the housing needs of low-income households can be better met by neighbourhoods of greater density, a greater variety of housing types and mixed land use than by neighbourhoods dominated by low-density, single-family homes. This research tests these relationships in two regions: one with and one without urban containment policies. The research provides evidence that neighbourhoods with a greater variety of housing types and residential density have a greater quantity of units affordable to very low-income renters and, at the same time, a greater quantity of units that are not affordable. An implication of the findings is that planners and growth management advocates should specify goals of housing types, in addition to density targets, when creating or updating comprehensive plans for future growth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, C. (2002) Planning a sustainable city: the promise and performance of Portland’s urban growth boundary, in: G. D. Squires (Ed.) Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Responses, pp. 207-235. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
2.
Calthorpe, P. and Fulton, W. ( 2001) The Regional City. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3.
Carruthers, J.I. ( 2002) The impacts of growth management programmes: a comparative analysis, Urban Studies, 39(11), pp. 1959-1982.
4.
Center for Transit Oriented Development (2007 ) Realizing the potential: expanding housing opportunities near transit. Center for Transit-Oriented Development , Washington, DC (http://www.reconnectingamerica.org ).
5.
Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. ( 2004) Neighbourhood composition and residential land prices: does exclusion raise or lower values?, Urban Studies, 41(2), pp. 299-315.
6.
Danielsen, K.A., Lang, R.E. and Fulton, W. ( 1999) Retracting suburbia: smart growth and the future of housing , Housing Policy Debate, 10(3), pp. 513-540.
7.
DiPasquale, D. and Wheaton, W.C. ( 1996) Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
Downs, A. ( 2002) Have housing prices risen faster in Portland than elsewhere? , Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), pp. 7-31.
9.
Downs, A. ( 2004) Growth management, smart growth, and affordable housing , in: A. Downs (Ed.) Growth Management and Affordable Housing: Do They Conflict?, ch. 7. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10.
Elliott, M. ( 1981) The impact of growth control regulations on housing prices in California, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 9(2), pp. 115-133.
11.
Fischel, W.A. ( 2001) The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M. and Harrison, A. ( 2001) Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
Galster, G. ( 1996) William Grigsby and the analysis of housing sub-markets and filtering, Urban Studies, 33(10), pp. 1797-1805.
14.
Geoghegan, J. ( 2002) The value of open spaces in residential land use, Land Use Policy, 19(1), pp. 91-98.
15.
Glaeser, E. and Shapiro, J. ( 2001) City Growth and the 2000 Census: Which Places Grew, and Why. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16.
Gleeson, M.E. ( 1979) Effects of an urban growth management system on land values , Land Economics, 55(3), pp. 350-365.
17.
Grant, J. ( 2002) Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), pp. 71-84.
18.
Grigsby, W.G. ( 1963) Housing Markets and Public Policy. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press .
19.
Haas, P.M., Makarewicz, C., Benedict, A. et al. (2007) Housing and transportation cost trade-offs and burdens of working households in 28 metros. Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, IL.
20.
Irwin, E.G. ( 2002) The effects of open space on residential property values , Land Economics, 78(4), pp. 465-480.
21.
Kalinosky, L. ( 2001) Smart growth for neighborhoods: affordable housing and regional vision. National Neighborhood Coalition , Washington, DC.
22.
Knaap, G. ( 1985) The price effects of urban growth boundaries in metropolitan Portland, Oregon, Land Economics, 61(1), pp. 26-35.
23.
Knaap, G. and Nelson, A.C. ( 1992) The Regulated Landscape. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
24.
Krizek, K.J. ( 2003) Operationalizing neighborhood accessibility for land use-travel behavior research and regional modeling, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), pp. 270-287.
25.
Malpezzi, S. ( 1996) Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. metropolitan areas, Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), pp. 209-241.
26.
Miller, T.I. ( 1986) Must growth restrictions eliminate moderate-priced housing? , Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(3), pp. 319-325.
27.
Myers, D. and Gearin, E. ( 2001) Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments, Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), pp. 633-659.
28.
Nelson, A.C. ( 1985) Demand, segmentation, and timing effects of an urban containment program on urban fringe land values, Urban Studies, 22(5), pp. 439-443.
29.
Nelson, A.C. and Dawkins, C.J. (2004) Urban Containment in the United States. Washington, DC : American Planning Association.
30.
Ozanne, L. and Thibodeau, T. ( 1983) Explaining metropolitan housing price differences, Journal of Urban Economics, 13(1), pp. 51-66.
31.
Pendall, R., Martin, J. and Fulton, W. ( 2002) Holding the line: urban containment in the United States . Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
32.
Phillips, J. and Goodstein, E. ( 2000) Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland , Oregon, Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3), pp. 334-344.
Portland Metro (2004) Regional framework plan. Portland Metro, Portland, OR.
35.
Roe, B., Irwin, E.G. and Morrow-Jones, H.A. ( 2004) The effects of farmland, farmland preservation, and other neighborhood amenities on housing values and residential growth, Land Economics, 80(1), pp. 55-75.
36.
Rothenberg, J., Galster, G., Butler, R.V. and Pitkin, J. ( 1991) The Maze of Urban Housing Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
Schwartz, S.I., Hansen, D.E. and Green, R. ( 1981) Suburban growth controls and the price of new housing , Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 8(4), pp. 303-320.
38.
Segal, D. and Srinivasan, P. ( 1985) The impact of suburban growth restrictions on U.S. housing price inflation, 1975-1978, Urban Geography, 6(1), pp. 14-26.
39.
Shultz, S.D. and King, D.A. ( 2001) The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open-space amenities and land use, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22(2/3), pp. 239-252.
40.
Smart Growth Network (2001) Affordable housing and smart growth: making the connection. National Neighborhood Coalition, Washington, DC.
Song, Y. and Knaap, G.-J. ( 2003) New urbanism and housing values: a disaggregate assessment , Journal of Urban Economics, 54(2), pp. 218-238. Song, Y. and Knaap, G.-J. (2004a) Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(6), pp. 663-680.
43.
Song, Y. and Knaap, G.-J. ( 2004b) Measuring urban form: is Portland winning the war on sprawl?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), pp. 210-225.
44.
Staley, S.R., Edgens, J.G. and Mildner, G.C.S. ( 1999) A line in the land: urban growth boundaries, smart growth, and housing afford-ability. Reason Public Policy Institute , Los Angeles, CA.
45.
Stull, W.J. ( 1975) Community environment, zoning, and the market value of single-family homes, Journal of Law and Economics, 18(2), pp. 535-557.
46.
US Census Bureau (1990) Summary File 3, 1990 decennial census. US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
47.
US Census Bureau (2000) Summary File 3, 2000 decennial census. US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
48.
US Census Bureau (2006) 2006 American community survey. US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, Washington, DC
49.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development ( 2007) Affordable housing needs 2005: report to Congress. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC.
50.
Voith, R.P. and Crawford, D.L. ( 2004) Smart growth and affordable housing, in: A. Downs (Ed.) Growth Management and Affordable Housing: Do They Conflict?, ch. 3. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
