On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration,Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2010
On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration,Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad
Conceptually, the degrees of spatial and functional integration and urban complementarities in economic network relations are hypothesised to be important. In this paper, data on interfirm relations in the Dutch Randstad are used to test conditions for integration and the existence of economic complementarities. A clear hierarchy is observed in the different types of spatial interdependencies in the Randstad, in which the central place model prevails. Furthermore, no evidence is found for the functional integration of municipalities in the Randstad. It is concluded that, at this moment, the Randstad does not function as a spatially and functionally integrated region and that spatial economic policy can better focus on smaller regions within the Randstad. This also calls into question the applicability of the urban network concept in general, as the Dutch Randstad is usually seen as a prime example of an economically successful polycentric urban system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agresti, A. ( 2002) Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
Alonso, W. ( 1964) Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
3.
Anas, A., Arnott, A. and Small, K.A. ( 1998) Urban spatial structure, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, pp. 1426-1464.
4.
Aoyama, Y. and Castells, M. ( 2002) The informational society, an empirical assessment: employment and occupational structures of G-7 countries in the 1990s, International Labour Review, 141, pp. 123-159.
5.
Bailey, N. and Turok, I. ( 2001) Central Scotland as a polycentric urban region: useful planning concept or chimera?, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 697-715.
6.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. ( 2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography , 28, pp. 31-56.
7.
Batten, D.F. ( 1995) Network cities: creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century, Urban Studies, 32, pp. 313-327.
8.
Bourne, J. S. and Simmons J. W. (Eds) (1978) Systems of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Bröcker, J. ( 1989) How to eliminate certain defects of the potential formula , Environment and Planning A, 21, pp. 817-830.
10.
Burg, A. J. van der and Dieleman, F.M. ( 2004) Dutch urbanisation policies: from compact city to urban network, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie , 95, pp. 108-116.
11.
Burger, M., Oort, F. G. van and Linders, G.J. ( 2009) On the specification of the gravity model of trade: zero’s, excess zero’s and modified Poisson estimation, Spatial Economic Analysis4, pp. 167-190.
12.
Burgess, E.W. (1925) The Growth of the City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Camagni, R. and Capello, R. (2004) The city network paradigm: theory and empirical evidence, in: R. Capello and P. Nijkamp (Eds) Urban Dynamics and Growth, pp. 495-529. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
14.
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. ( 1986) Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, pp. 29-53.
15.
Capello, R. ( 2000) The city network paradigm: measuring urban network externalities , Urban Studies, 37, pp. 1925-1945.
16.
Coe, N.N. and Townsend, A.R. ( 1998) Debunking the myth of localized agglomerations: the development of a regionalized service economy in south-east England, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23, pp. 385-404.
17.
Combes, P.P. ( 2000) Economic structure and local growth: France 1984-1993 , Journal of Urban Economics, 47, pp. 329-355.
18.
Curran, J. and Blackburn, R. ( 1994) Small Firms and Local Economic Networks: The Death of the Local Economy?London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
19.
Davoudi, S. ( 2003) Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda?, European Planning Studies, 11, pp. 979-999.
20.
Dieleman, F.M. and Musterd, S. ( 1992) The Randstad: A Research and Policy Laboratory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21.
EZ (Ministry of Economic Affairs) (2005) Peaks in the delta: regional economic perspective. EZ, The Hague.
22.
Fingleton, B. ( 2003) Externalities, economic geography and spatial econometrics: conceptual and modelling developments, International Regional Science Review, 26, pp. 197-207.
23.
Flowerdew, R. and Aitkin, M. ( 1982) A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution, Journal of Regional Science, 22, pp. 191-202.
24.
Frost, M.E. and Spence, N.A. ( 1995) The rediscovery of accessibility and economic potential: the critical issue of self-potential, Environment and Planning A, 27, pp. 1833-1848.
25.
Garreau, J. ( 1988) Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Anchor Books.
26.
Geyer, H.S. ( 2002) On urban system evolution, in: H. S. Geyer (Ed.) International Handbook of Urban Systems, pp. 39-66. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
27.
Glaeser, E.L. ( 2007) Do regional economies need regional coordination?, in: K. S. Goldfield (Ed.) The Economic Geography of Megaregions, pp. 11-57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Glaeser, E.L., Kallal, H.D., Scheinkman, A. and Shleifer, A. ( 1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 100, pp. 1126-1152.
29.
Goei, B. de, Burger, M., Oort, F. G. van and Kitson, M. ( 2010) Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East UK: evidence from commuting patterns, 1981-2001 , Regional Studies (forthcoming).
30.
Gourieroux, C., Montfort, A. and Trognon, A. ( 1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models, Econometrica, 52, pp. 701-720.
31.
Graham, S. and Marvin, S. ( 2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
32.
Green, N. ( 2007) Functional polycentricity: a formal definition in terms of social network analysis, Urban Studies, 44, pp. 2077-2103.
33.
Hall, P. ( 1966) The World Cities. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
34.
Hall, P. ( 2001) Global city regions in the twenty-first century, in: A. J. Scott (Ed.) Global City Regions, pp. 59-77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Hall, P. and Pain, K. ( 2006) The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-city Regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
36.
Ham, M. van ( 2002) Job Access, Workplace Mobility, and Occupational Achievement . Delft: Eburon.
37.
Haynes, K.E. and Fortheringham, A.S. ( 1984) Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models. London: Sage.
38.
Hohenberg, P.M. and Lees, L.H. (1985) The Making of Urban Europe 1000-1950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Horan, T.A., Chinitz, B. and Hackler, P. (1996) Stalking the invisible revolution: the impact of information technology on human settlement patterns. Research Institute, Claremont University.
40.
Hoyler, M., Kloosterman, R.C. and Sokol, M. ( 2008) Polycentric puzzles: emerging mega-city regions seen through the lens of advanced producer services, Regional Studies, 42, pp. 1055-1064.
41.
Kloosterman, R.C. and Lambregts, B. ( 2001) Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: the case of the Randstad, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 717-732.
42.
Kloosterman, R.C. and Musterd, S. ( 2001) The polycentric urban region: towards a research agenda , Urban Studies, 38(4), pp. 623-633.
43.
Kolko, J. ( 2002) Silicon mountains, silicon mole-hills: geographic concentration and convergence of internet industries in the US, Information Economics and Policy, 14, pp. 211-232.
44.
Laan, L. van der ( 1998) Changing urban systems: an empirical analysis at two spatial levels, Regional Studies, 32, pp. 235-247.
45.
Lambooy, J.G. ( 1998) Polynucleation and urban development: the Randstad, European Planning Studies, 6, pp. 457-467.
46.
Lambregts, B. ( 2008) Geographies of knowledge formation in mega-city regions: some evidence from the Dutch Randstad, Regional Studies, 42, pp. 1173-1186.
47.
Lambregts, B., Kloosterman, R., Werff, M. van der et al. (2006) Randstad Holland: multiple faces of a polycentric role model, in: P. Hall and K. Pain (Eds) The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-city Regions in Europe, pp. 137-145. London: Earthscan.
48.
Limtanakool, N., Dijst, M. and Schwanen, T. ( 2007) A theoretical framework and methodology for characterising national urban systems on the basis of flows of people: empirical evidence for France and Germany, Urban Studies, 44, pp. 2123-2145.
49.
Long, J.S. ( 1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
50.
Meijers, E. ( 2005) Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: is a network of cities more than the sum of its parts?, Urban Studies, 42, pp. 765-781.
51.
Meijers, E. ( 2007) From a central place to a network model: theory and evidence of a paradigm change, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, pp. 245-259.
52.
Nooteboom, B. ( 1999) Inter-firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. London: Routledge.
53.
Oort, F. G. van ( 2004) Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands. Aldershot: Ashgate.
54.
Oort, F. G. van ( 2007) Spatial and sectoral composition effects of agglomeration economies, Papers in Regional Science, 86, pp. 5-30.
55.
Parr, J.B. ( 1999) Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: a retrospective view, Urban Studies, 36, pp. 1195-1216.
56.
Parr, J.B. ( 2004) The polycentric urban region: a closer inspection, Regional Studies, 38, pp. 231-240.
57.
Phelps, N. and Ozawa, T. ( 2003) Contrasts in agglomeration: proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared, Progress in Human Geography , 27, pp. 583-604.
58.
Pred, A. ( 1973) Urban Growth and the Circulation of Information: The United States System of Cities 1790-1840. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
Pred, A. ( 1977) City Systems in Advanced Economies: Past Growth, Present Processes and Future Development Options. London: Hutchinson.
60.
Renkow, M. and Hoover, D.M. ( 2000) Commuting, migration and rural-urban population dynamics , Journal of Regional Science, 40, pp. 261-287.
61.
Rosenthal, S.S. and Strange, W.C. ( 2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration , Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, pp. 377-393.
62.
Rosenthal, S.S. and Strange, W.C. ( 2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies , in: J. V. Henderson and J.-F. Thisse (Eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics: Cities and Geography, pp. 2119-2179. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
63.
RPB (Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research) ( 2006) Vele steden maken nog geen Randstad. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers and RPB.
64.
Sachar, A. ( 1994) Randstad Holland: a world city?, Urban Studies, 31, pp. 381-400.
65.
Scott, A.J. (1988) Metropolis: From the Division of Labor to Urban Form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
66.
Sen , A. and Smith, T.E. (1995) Gravity Models of Spatial Interaction Behaviour. Heidelberg : Springer.
67.
Smith, D.M. (1971) Industrial Location: An Economic Geographical Analysis. New York: Wiley.
68.
V&W (2004) Mobility memorandum. V&W, The Hague.
69.
VROM (Ministry of Spatial Planning and the Environment) ( 2004) Spatial memorandum. Vrom, The Hague.
70.
Vrom (2008) Structural vision Randstad 2040: towards a sustainable and competitive European top region. VROM, The Hague.
71.
Vuong, Q.H. ( 1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses, Econometrica, 57, pp. 307-333.
