In this article, an assessment is made of the consequences of globalisation for urban wage inequality. Using data on employers in the Dutch cities of Amsterdam and Rotterdam, it is shown that simply equating global city formation with globalisation, when it comes to urban wage inequality—which is the common research practice in urban studies—leads to a blind spot for the impact of international competition, falsely equates economic restructuring with globalisation and strongly overrates the impact of globalisation on the urban wage structure. Global city formation does not lead to polarising tendencies, while exposure to international competition leads to upgrading tendencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderson, A.S. ( 1999) Explaining deindustrialization: globalization, failure, or success?, American Sociological Review, 64(5), pp. 701-722.
2.
Alderson, A.S. and Beckfield, J. ( 2004) Power and position in the world city system, American Journal of Sociology, 109(4), pp. 811-851.
3.
Baum, S. ( 1997) Sydney, Australia: a global city? Testing the social polarisation thesis, Urban Studies, 34(11), pp. 1881-1901.
4.
Baum, S. ( 1999) Social transformations in the global city: Singapore, Urban Studies, 36(7), pp. 1095-1117.
5.
Beaverstock, J.V., Hoyler, M., Pain, K. and Taylor, P.J. ( 1999) A roster of world cities, Cities, 16, pp. 445-458.
6.
Bell, D. ( 1974) The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. London: Heinemann.
7.
Burgers, J. ( 1996) No polarisation in Dutch cities?Inequality in a corporatist country, Urban Studies, 33, pp. 99-105.
8.
Burgers, J. and Musterd, S. ( 2001) Global and local determinants of social exclusion: Amsterdam versus Rotterdam, in: H. T. Andersen and R. van Kempen (Eds) Governing European Cities: Social Fragmentation, Social Exclusion and Urban Governance, pp. 125-149. Aldershot : Ashgate.
9.
Burgers, J. and Musterd, S. ( 2002) Understanding urban inequality: a model based on existing theories and an empirical illustration, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), pp. 403-413.
10.
Davies, H.W.E. (1993) The Netherlands, in: H. W. E. Davies (Ed.) Planning Control in Western Europe, pp. 337-407. London: HMSO.
11.
Dewatripont, M., Sapir, A. and Sekkat, K (Eds) (1999) Trade and Jobs in Europe: Much Ado about Nothing?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Dicken, P. (2003) Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century, 4th edn. New York: The Guilford Press.
13.
Dogan, M. ( 2004) Four hundred giant cities atop the world, International Social Science Journal, 56(181), pp. 347-360.
14.
Fainstein, S. (2002) Inequality in global city regions, in: A. Scott (Ed.) Global City Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy , pp. 285-298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Friedman, J. ( 1986) The world city hypothesis, Development and Change, 17(1), pp. 69-84.
16.
Friedman, J. and Wolff, G. ( 1982) World city formation: an agenda for research and action , International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6(3), pp. 309-344.
17.
Hamnett, C. ( 1994) Social polarisation in global cities: theory and evidence , Urban Studies, 31(3), pp. 401-425.
18.
Hamnett, C. ( 1996) Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes, Urban Studies, 33(8), pp. 1407-1430.
19.
Held, D. and McGrew, A. (Eds) (2000) The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalisation Debate. Cambridge : Polity Press.
20.
Kollmeyer, C. ( 2009) Explaining deindustrialization: how affluence, productivity growth, and globalization diminish manufacturing employment, American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), pp. 1644-1674.
21.
Krugman, P.R. ( 1994) Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations. New York: Norton.
22.
Krugman, P.R. ( 1996) Pop Internationalism, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
23.
Krugman, P.R. and Lawrence, R.Z. ( 1994) Trade, jobs and wages, Scientific American , 270, pp. 44-49.
24.
McCann, E.J. ( 2004) Urban political economy beyond the ‘global city’ , Urban Studies, 41(12), pp. 2315-2333.
25.
Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W. and Breebaart, M. ( 1998) Multi-ethnic Metropolis: Patterns and Policies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26.
Neal, Z. ( 2008) The duality of world cities and firms: comparing networks, hierarchies, and inequalities in the global economy, Global Networks, 8(1), pp. 94-115.
27.
Newman, P. and Thornley, A. ( 1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects. London: Routledge.
28.
Nollmann, G. ( 2006) Erhöht Globalisierung die Ungleicheit der Einkommen? , Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie , 58(4), pp. 638-659.
29.
Parkinson, M., Foley, B. and Judd, D. (Eds) ( 1988) Regenerating the Cities. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
30.
Sassen, S. ( 1991) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Sassen, S. ( 1998) Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: New Press.
32.
Sassen, S. ( 2000) Cities in a World Economy, 2nd edn. London: Pine Forge Press .
33.
Sassen, S. ( 2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, 2nd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Sassen, S. ( 2006a) Cities in a World Economy, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
35.
Sassen, S. ( 2006b) Foreword: searching for the global in the urban, in: M. M. Amen, K. Archer and M. M. Bosman (Eds) Relocating Global Cities: From the Centre to the Margins, pp. ix-xiii. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
36.
Sassen, S. ( 2006c) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Sassen, S. ( 2007) A Sociology of Globalization. New York : W.W. Norton & Co.
38.
Short, J.R., Yeung, K., Kuus, M. and Wells, H. ( 1996) The dirty little secret of world cities research, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20, pp. 697-717.
Tai, P.-F. ( 2006) Social polarisation: comparing Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei, Urban Studies, 43(10), pp. 1737-1756.
41.
Taylor, P.J. ( 2002) Amsterdam in a world city network ( http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rm1.pdf; accessed 23 October 2007).
42.
Taylor, P.J. (2004) World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. London: Routledge.
43.
Vaattovaara, M. and Kortteinen, M. ( 2003) Beyond polarisation versus professionalisation? A case study of the development of the Helsinki region, Finland, Urban Studies, 40(11), pp. 2127-2145.
44.
Waldinger, R. (1996) Still the Promised City? African-Americans and New Immigrants in Postindustrial New York. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45.
Walks, A.R. ( 2001) The social ecology of the post-Fordist/global city? Economic restructuring and socio-spatial polarisation in the Toronto urban region, Urban Studies, 38(3), pp. 407-447.
46.
Wessel, T. ( 2005) Industrial shift, skill mismatch and income inequality: a decomposition analysis of changing distributions in the Oslo region, Urban Studies, 42(9), pp. 1549-1568.
