The main upgrading programme (MUP) is a major policy implemented by the Singapore Housing Development Board (HDB) since the 1990s. This heavily subsidised policy is highly targeted in order to enhance the social and economic value of public housing in Singapore. It benefits HDB households residing in the older HDB housing estates in terms of both an enhanced asset value of the household’s flat and a quality living environment. An HDB flat owner whose precinct is selected for upgrading under the MUP policy is envisaged to be holding a call option to upgrade his flat, as this option to upgrade is valuable and it has an opportunity to command a higher price in the HDB resale market. This paper estimates the option premiums for upgrading by utilising the intuitive and explicit numerical method solution of the binomial real option pricing model and the Samuelson—McKean closed-form solution. The embedded real option premiums under the MUP policy are estimated at S$10 300 and S$2 000 for the popular three-room HDB flat and four-room HDB flat respectively. It is also found that government subsidies have a significant impact on the option premiums.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amram, M. and Lakatilaka, N. ( 1999) Real Option: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
2.
Black, F. and Scholes, M. ( 1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 637-654.
3.
Blanc, D. and Laferrère, A. ( 2001) The effect of public social housing on households’ consumption in France, Journal of Housing Economics, 10(4), pp. 429-455.
4.
Boelhouwer, P. ( 2003) Social housing finance in the Netherlands: the road to independence, Housing Finance International, 17(4), pp. 17-21.
5.
Brown, G. and Ong, S.E. ( 2000) Valuing real and contractual options, Australian Land Economics Review, pp. 99-112.
6.
Capozza, D. and Li, Y. ( 1994) The intensity and timing of investment: the case of land , The American Economic Review, 84(4), pp. 889-904.
7.
Capozza, D. and Sick, G. ( 1991) Valuing long-term leases: the option to redevelop, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4(2), pp. 209-223.
8.
Chang, K.L. ( 1996) HDB’s upgrading programme in Bukit Ho Swee. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore.
9.
Childs, P.D., Riddiough, T.J. and Triantis, A.J. ( 1996) Mixed uses and the redevelopment option, Real Estate Economics, 24, pp. 317-339.
10.
Chiong, L.K. ( 1996) Housing price dynamics and the valuation of mortgage default options, Journal of Housing Economics, 5, pp. 18-40.
11.
Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A. and Rubinstein, M. ( 1979) Option pricing: a simplified approach, Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), pp. 229-263.
12.
Geltner, D.M. and Miller, N.G. ( 2001) Commercial Real Estate Analysis and Investments. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Gilbert, A. ( 2004) Helping the poor through housing subsidies: lessons from Chile, Colombia and South Africa, Habitat International, 28(1), pp. 13-40.
14.
Goh, C.T. ( 1995) Speech at the completion ceremony of Kim Keat Demonstration Upgrading Precinct. January.
15.
Grenadier, S.R. ( 1995) Valuing lease contracts: a real-options approach, Journal of Financial Economics, 38, pp. 297-331.
16.
Guevarra, V. and Tan , H.Y. (2003) Contractors sink into the red after undercutting each other, The Straits Times, 11 June.
17.
Harris, R. and Giles, C. ( 2003) A mixed message: the agents and forms of international housing policy, 1945-1973, Habitat International, 27(2), pp. 167-191.
18.
HDB (Housing Development Board) (1993-2002) Annual reports. HDB, Singapore.
Ho , L.C. (2003) HDB could have done better, The Straits Times, 10 June.
21.
Hodder, J.E. and Riggs, H.E. ( 1985) Pitfalls in evaluating risky projects, Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 128-135.
22.
Hoek-Smit, M.C. and Diamond, D.B. ( 2003) Subsidies for housing finance, Housing Finance International, 17(3), pp. 3-13.
23.
Hull, J. ( 1993) Options, Futures and Other Derivative Securities, 2nd edn. London: Prentice-Hall .
24.
Kautt, G. ( 2003) Real option analysis: the profession’s next cutting-edge tool, Journal of Financial Planning, 16(2), pp. 72-79.
25.
Koh, T.C. ( 1997) The impact of the main upgrading programme on property value. Unpublished MA thesis, School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore.
26.
Lee, P.C. ( 1992) Residents’ preferences of the HDB’s upgrading programme. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore.
27.
Lee, P.L. ( 1996) The evaluation of the main upgrading programme in Ang Mo Kio. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore.
28.
Leong, P.Y. ( 2003) At least one MP to delay upgrading, The Straits Times, 8 August.
29.
Leong, P.Y. ( 2003) Four contractors later, and still upgrading not ready, The Straits Times, 6 June.
30.
Leong, P.Y. ( 2003) Upgrading work at Marine Terrace back on track, The Straits Times, 14 August.
31.
Leong, P.Y. ( 2003) Upgrading? Maybe later, The Straits Times, 8 September .
Lim, L.L. ( 1996) The HDB main upgrading programme: an evaluation on cost allocation. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore.
34.
Limberes, N.M. ( 2006) Mass voting behaviour: the factors that influenced the conservative vote during the 1981 Greek general election, European Journal of Political Research, 14(1/2), pp. 113-137.
35.
Lucius, D.L. ( 2001) Real options in real estate development, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(1), pp. 73-78.
36.
McDonald, R. and Siegel, D. ( 1986) The value of waiting to invest, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), pp. 707-727.
37.
McKee, K. ( 2007) Community ownership in Glasgow: the devolution of ownership and control, or centralizing process?European Journal of Housing Policy, 7(3), pp. 319-336.
38.
Merton, R.C. ( 1973) The theory of rational option pricing, Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, pp. 141-183.
39.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (n.d.) Website (http: //www.mas.gov.sg;accessed 14 December 2003).
40.
Moore, W.T. ( 2001) Real Options and Option-embedded Securities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
41.
Nygaard, C., Gibb, K. and Berry, M. ( 2007) Ownership transfer of social housing in the UK: a property rights approach, Housing, Theory and Society, 24(2), pp. 89-110.
42.
Ong, S.E. ( 1999) Aborted property transactions: seller under-compensation in the absence of legal recourse, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 17(2), pp. 126-144.
43.
Oppenheimer, P.H. ( 2002) A critique of using real options pricing models in valuing real estate projects and contracts, Briefings in Real Estate Finance, 2(3), pp. 221-233.
44.
Priemus, H. ( 2003) Social housing management: concerns about effectiveness and efficiency in the Netherlands, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 18(3), pp. 269-279.
45.
Quigg, L. ( 1993) Empirical testing of real option pricing models, Journal of Finance, 48(2), pp. 621-640.
46.
Samuelson, P.A. ( 1965) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly , Industrial Management Review, 6, pp. 41-49.
47.
Saugeres, L. ( 2000) Of tidy gardens and clean houses: housing officers as agents of social control, Geoforum, 31(4), pp. 587-599.
48.
Schaefer, J.P. ( 2003) Financing social housing in France, Housing Finance International, 17(4), pp. 27-34.
49.
Sim, L.L., Yu, S.M. and Han, S.S. ( 2003) Public housing and ethnic integration in Singapore, Habitat International, 27(2), pp. 293-307.
50.
Sin, A.M. ( 1999) The impact of Housing And Development Board’s main upgrading programme. Unpublished MA thesis, School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore.
51.
Sing, T.F. ( 2001) Optimal timing of a real estate development under uncertainty , Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(1), pp. 35-52.
52.
Sing, T.F. ( 2002) Valuing renewal options in public industrial leases in Singapore, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 20(3), pp. 222-241.
53.
The Straits Times (2003) HDB: no request made to install toilet bowls, 5 June.
54.
The Straits Times (2003) HDB ‘going all out’ to complete stalled upgrading, 12 June.
55.
The Straits Times (2003) When upgrading is a dirty word, 16 July.
56.
The Straits Times (2003) HDB precinct says ‘no’ to upgrading-a first, 7 August.
57.
The Straits Times (2003) HDB: one more delay, 27 September.
58.
The Straits Times (2003) Season of HDB delays, 1 October.
59.
Tahtinen, T. ( 2003) Financing social housing in Finland, Housing Finance International, 17(4), pp. 22-26.
60.
Tan, H.Y. ( 2003) Upgrading delay-many get toilet bowls, finally, The Straits Times, 10 June.
61.
Tan, T.W. ( 1996) An in-depth study into the upgrading of Kim Keat Court. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, School of Building and Estate Management , National University of Singapore.
62.
Titman, S. ( 1985) Urban land prices under uncertainty, American Economic Review, 75(3), pp. 505-514.
63.
Williams, J.T. ( 1991) Real estate development as an option, Journal of Real Estate Economic and Finance, 4(2), pp. 191-208.
64.
Wong, L.W. ( 2001) Application of financial option pricing models to real options. Unpublished MA thesis, SmealCollege of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University.
65.
Wong, T.C. and Yap, A. ( 2003) From universal public housing to meeting the increasing aspiration for private housing in Singapore, Habitat International , 27(3), pp. 361-380.
66.
Yeo, M.H. ( 2003) Upgrade flat? Thanks but no thanks, The Straits Times, 18 September
67.
Zainol, V. ( 2003) Window pain, The Straits Times, 8 December.
