This paper examines the residential mobility behaviour of immigrants and natives in The Netherlands using a rich administrative individual data file. The inclination to move and the choice of destination neighbourhood are estimated, correcting for the selection bias of movers. Subsequently, the role of preferences and discrimination in the mobility behaviour is implicitly derived from regression estimates. The analysis shows that the percentage of natives in the destination neighbourhood is predicted to be about 18 percentage points lower for non-Western immigrants than for natives. About 65 per cent of the differential is explained by their observable characteristics; the remaining part can largely be attributed to preferences and discrimination. No indication is found of the spatial assimilation of second-generation non-Western immigrants. On the other hand, the mobility pattern of the second-generation Western immigrants is similar to that of natives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayer, P., McMillan, R. and Rueben, K.S. (2004) What drives racial segregation? New evidence using census microdata, Journal of Urban Economics, 56, pp. 514-535.
2.
Blasius, J., Friedrichs, J. and Galster, G. (2007) Introduction: frontiers of quantifying neighbourhood effects, Housing Studies, 22(5), pp. 627-637.
3.
Blinder, A.S. (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates, Journal of Human Resources, 8, pp. 436-455.
4.
Bontje, M. and Latten, J. (2005) Stable size, changing composition: recent migration dynamics of the Dutch large cities, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 9(4), pp. 444-451.
5.
Card, D., Mas, A. and Rothstein, J. (2008) Tipping and the dynamics of segregation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), pp. 177-218.
6.
Clark, W.A.V. (1991) Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model, Demography , 28, pp. 1-19.
7.
Clark, W.A.V. (1992) Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context, Demography, 29, pp. 451-466.
8.
Cotton, J. (1988) On the decomposition of wage differentials, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, pp. 236-243.
9.
Crowder, K. (2000) The racial context of white mobility: an individual-level assessment of the white flight hypothesis, Social Science Research, 29, pp. 223-257.
10.
Crowder, K., South, S.J. and Chavez, E. (2006) Wealth, race and inter-neighborhood migration, American Sociological Review, 71, pp. 72-94.
11.
Cutler, D.M., Glaeser, E.L. and Vigdor, J.L. (1999) The rise and decline of theAmerican ghetto, Journal of Political Economy, 107, pp. 455-506.
12.
Dawkins, C.J. (2006) Are social networks the ties that bind families to neighborhoods?, Housing Studies, 21, pp. 867-881.
13.
Farley, R., Schuman, H., Bianchi, S. et al. (1978) Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs: will the trend toward racially separate communities continue?, Social Science Research, 7, pp. 319-344.
14.
Farley, R., Steeh, C.G., Krysan, M. et al. (1994) Stereotypes and segregation: neighbourhoods in Detroit area, American Journal of Sociology, 100, pp. 750-778.
15.
Galster, G.C. (1990) White flight from racially integrated neighbourhoods in the 1970s: the Cleveland experience, Urban Studies, 27, pp. 385-399.
16.
Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error , Econometrica, 47, pp. 153-162.
17.
Kempen, R. van and Özüekren, A.S. (1998) Ethnic segregation in cities: new forms and explanations in a dynamic world, Urban Studies, 35, pp. 1631-1656.
18.
Kempen, R. van and Weesep, J. van (1998) Ethnic residential patterns in Dutch cities: backgrounds, shifts and consequences, Urban Studies, 35(10), pp. 1813-1833.
19.
Musterd, S. (2005) Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: levels, causes, and effects, Journal of Urban Affairs, 27, pp. 331-348.
20.
Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W. and Vos, S. de (2003) Neighbourhood effects and social mobility: a longitudinal analysis, Housing Studies , 18, pp. 877-892.
21.
Nawata, K. and Nagase, N. (1996) Estimation of sample selection bias models, Econometric Reviews, 14, pp. 387-400.
22.
Neuman, S. and Oaxaca, R.L. (2004) Wage decompositions with selectivity-corrected wage equations: a methodological note, Journal of Economic Inequality, 2, pp. 3-10.
23.
Neumark, D. (1988) Employers' discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination, Journal of Human Resources, 23, pp. 279-295.
24.
Oaxaca, R. (1973) Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets , International Economic Review, 14, pp. 693-709.
25.
Oaxaca, R.L. and Ransom, M.R. (1994) On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials, Journal of Econometrics, 61, pp. 5-21.
26.
Peach, C. (1996) Does Britain have ghettos?, Transactions of the Institute ofBritish Geographers, NS, 21(1), pp. 216-235.
27.
Quillian, L. (2002) Why is black-white residential segregation so persistent? Evidence on three theories from migration data, Social Science Research, 31, pp. 197-229.
28.
Sartori, A.E. (2003) An estimator for some binary outcome selection models without exclusion restrictions, Political Analysis , 11, pp. 11-138.
29.
Schelling, T.C. (1971) Dynamic models of segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, pp. 143-186.
30.
Simpson, L. (2004) Statistics of racial segregation: measures, evidence and policy, Urban Studies, 14(3), pp. 661-681.
31.
South, S.J., Crowder, K. and Chavez, E. (2005) Migration and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latinos: classical versus segmented trajectories, Demography, 42, pp. 497-521.
32.
Spilimbergo, A. and Ubeda, L. (2004) Family attachment and the decision to move by race , Journal of Urban Economics, 55, pp. 478-497.
33.
Wooldridge, J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Zorlu, A. (2008) Who leaves the city? The influence of ethnic segregation and family ties. Discussion Paper No. 3343, Institute for the Study of Labor, University of Amsterdam.
35.
Zorlu, A. and Mulder, C.H. (2007) Initial and subsequent location choices of immigrants to the Netherlands, Regional Studies, 42(2), pp. 245-264.
