This article explores the variety of residential area types in the three largest Dutch cities: Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. The data are characterised as multidimensional, as they pertain to socio-demographic and other `objective' indicators produced by official statistics, as well as to more `subjective' location preferences expressed by the residents themselves. The method used is a clustering and classification approach based on two-dimensional models generated by the self-organising map (SOM) and learning vector quantisation (LVQ). Using sub-district-level data, the study shows that, while some characteristic residential milieus can be found in all three cities, they have a broader variety in Amsterdam than in Rotterdam or The Hague. This supports the commonly held presumption that Amsterdam is less segregated than Rotterdam or The Hague in terms of intraurban housing patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ball, M.J. and Kirwan, R.M. (1977) Accessibility and supply constraints in the urban housing market, Urban Studies, 14, pp. 11-32.
2.
Bolt, G., Hooimeijer, P. and Kempen, R. van (2002) Ethnic segregation in the Netherlands: new patterns, new policies?, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie , 93(2), pp. 214-220.
3.
Bourassa, S.C., Hamelink, F., Hoesli, M. and MacGregor, B.D. (1999) Defining housing submarkets, Journal of Housing Economics, 8, pp. 160-183.
4.
Clapp, J.M. and Wang, Y. (2006) Defining neighborhood boundaries: are census tracts obsolete?, Journal of Urban Economics, 59, pp. 259-284.
5.
Deboeck, G. and Kohonen, T. (1998) Introduction, in: G. Deboeck and T. Kohonen (Eds) Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-organizing Maps, pp. xxv-xlv. New York: Springer.
6.
Des Rosiers, F., Thériault, M., Kestens, Y. and Villeneuve, P. (2007) Landscaping attributes and property buyers' profiles: their joint effect on house prices, Housing Studies, 22(6), pp. 945-964.
7.
Deurloo, R. and Musterd, S. (2001) Residential profile of Surinamese and Moroccans in Amsterdam, Urban Studies, 38(3), pp. 467-485.
8.
Evans, A.W. (1985) Urban Economics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Fischer, M.M. (1994) From conventional to knowledge-based geographic information systems, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems , 18, pp. 233-242.
10.
Fischer, M.M. (1997) Computational neural networks: a new paradigm for spatial analysis, Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 1873-1891.
11.
Francke, M.K. and Vos, G.A. (2004) The hierarchical trend model for property valuation and local price indices, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 28, pp. 179-208.
12.
Freeman, L. and Braconi, F. (2004) Gentrification and displacement, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), pp. 39-52.
13.
Hatzichristos, T. (2004) Delineation of demographic regions with GIS and computational intelligence, Environment and Planning B, 31, pp. 39-49.
14.
Kauko, T. (2002) Modelling locational determinants of house prices: neural network and value tree approaches. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht (http://www.library.uu.nl/decollectie/proefschriften/11688main.html).
15.
Kauko, T. (2004) A comparative perspective on urban spatial housing market structure: some more evidence of local sub-markets based on a neural network classification of Amsterdam, Urban Studies, 41(13), pp. 2555-2579.
16.
Kauko, T. (2005) Comparing Spatial Features of Urban Housing Markets: Recent Evidence of Submarket Formation in Metropolitan Helsinki and Amsterdam . Delft: Delft University Press .
17.
Kauko, T., Hakfoort, J. and Hooimeijer, P. (2002) Capturing housing market segmentation: an alternative approach based on neural network modelling, Housing Studies , 17(6), pp. 875-894.
18.
Kohonen, T. (1995) Self-organizing Maps. Berlin : Springer Verlag.
19.
Kohonen, T., Hynninen, J., Kangas, J. and Laaksonen, J. (1996) SOM_PAK: the self-organizing map program package . Report No. A31, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Helsinki University of Technology .
20.
Kryvobokov, M. and Wilhelmsson, M. (2007) Analysing location attributes with a hedonic model for apartment prices in Donetsk, Ukraine, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11(3), pp. 157-178.
21.
Laakso, S. (1997) Urban housing prices and the demand for housing characteristics. ETLA A 27 , The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki.
22.
Leishman, C. (2001) House building and product differentiation: an hedonic price approach, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment , 16(2), pp. 131-152.
23.
Ley, D., Tutchener, J. and Cunningham, G. (2002) Immigration, polarization, or gentrification? Accounting for changing house prices and dwelling values in gateway cities, Urban Geography, 23(8), pp. 703-727.
24.
Maclennan, D. (1982) Housing Economics. New York : Longman.
25.
McCluskey, W.J. and Anand, S. (1999) The application of intelligent hybrid techniques for the mass appraisal of residential properties, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(3), pp. 218-238.
26.
Meen, D. and Meen, G. (2003) Social behaviour as a basis for modelling the urban housing market: a review, Urban Studies, 40(5/6), pp. 917-935.
27.
Meen, G. (2001) Modelling Spatial Housing Markets: Theory, Analysis and Policy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28.
Meen, G. and Andrew, M. (2004) On the use of policy to reduce housing market segmentation , Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, pp. 727-751.
29.
Mills, E.S. (1971) The value of urban land, in: H. S. Perloff (Ed.) The Quality of the Urban Environment: Essays on `New Resources' in an Urban Age, pp. 231-253. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Inc.
30.
Musterd, S. and Deurloo, R. (2002) Unstable immigrant concentrations in Amsterdam: spatial segregation and integration of newcomers, Housing Studies, 17(3), pp. 487-503.
31.
Musterd, S. and Smakman, N. (2000) Integration of Caribbean immigrants in a welfare state city: Surinamese and Antilleans in Amsterdam, International Journal of Population Geography, 6, pp. 303-320.
32.
Needham, B., Francke, M. and Bosma, P. (1998) How the city of Amsterdam is using econometric modelling to value real estate, Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, 3(2), pp. 25-46.
33.
Openshaw, S. (1998) Neural network, genetic, and fuzzy logic models of spatial interaction, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1857-1872.
34.
Openshaw, S., Blake, M. and Wymer, C. ( 1994) Using neurocomputing methods to classify Britain's residential areas. Working Paper No. 94/17, School of Geography, University of Leeds.
35.
Orford, S. (1999) Valuing the Built Environment: GIS and House Price Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.
36.
Páez, A., Uchida, T. and Miyamoto, K. (2002) A general framework for estimation and inference of geographically weighted regression models: 1. location-specific kernel bandwidths and a test for locational heterogeneity, Environment and Planning A, 34, pp. 733-754.
37.
Richardson, H.W. (1977) The New Urban Economics. London : Pion.
38.
Rouwendal, J. and Straaten, W. van der (2008) The costs and benefits of providing open space in cities. Discussion Paper No. 98, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis , January.
39.
Scott, A. (2006) Reflections on the creative city: the example of Amsterdam. AMIDSt lecture, 2 April, University of Amsterdam .
