This paper applies a state-theoretical perspective to a historical analysis of gentrification and urban policies in Antwerp, Belgium. Before 1970, the city experienced a period of modernist hegemony, with urban development policies characterised by slum clearing, peripheral high-rise social housing construction and inner-city office development. After moving through a period of non-hegemony with intense debate and struggle about urban development, the city now appears to be experiencing another period of hegemony in urban policy of which state support for gentrification has become the centrepiece. A historical state-theoretical approach shows how this move has been the consequence of local institutionalisation and political conflicts following the collapse of modernism, and provides insight into the opportunities available for critical observers of gentrification to enhance policy relevance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aelst, P. van, Nuytemans, M. and Walgraeve, S. (2006) De verkiezingscampagne van 2006: onderzoeksnota [The electoral campaign of 2006: a research note]. University of Antwerp.
2.
AG Vespa (2007) Jaarverslag 2006. AG VESPA, Antwerp.
3.
Badcock, B. (2001) Thirty years on: gentrification and class change-over in Adelaide's inner suburbs, 1966-1996, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 1559-1572.
4.
Beaumont, J. and Loopmans, M. (2008) Towards radicalized communicative rationality: resident involvement and urban democracy in Rotterdam and Antwerp, International Journal for Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), pp. 95-113.
5.
Beaumont, J., Loopmans, M. and Uitermark, J. (2005) Politicization of research and the relevance of geography: some experiences and reflections for an ongoing debate, Area, 37(1), pp. 118-126.
6.
Bewonersgroepencongres ( 1997) Wijk in de kering, bewonersgroepencongres [Changing neighbourhood, resident group congress] 18 April, unpublished document, Antwerp.
7.
Billiet, J. and Witte, H. de (2001) Wie stemde in Juni 1999 voor het Vlaams Blok en waarom? [Who voted Vlaams Blok in June 1999 and why?] , Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 22(1), pp. 5-36.
8.
Blanc, M. (2000) La recherche et l'action: un couple heureux?, Espaces et Sociétés, 30(101/102), pp. 17-34.
9.
Boudry, L., Coninck, M. de, Fret, L. et al. (1999) Sociale, stedelijke en bestuurlijke ontwikkeling? Een tussentijdse SIF-Balans [Social, urban and governmental development? An intermediate evaluation of SIF], Alert, 25, pp. 21-48.
10.
Buyck, J. (1988) De jaren '60 van zero tot VAGA [The sixties from zero to VAGA], in: J. Weverbergh (Ed.) Antwerpen: De Jaren 60 [Antwerp: the sixties], pp. 181-202. Schoten : Hadewijch.
11.
Campenhout, L. van (2006) Dromen is Durven [To dream is to dare]. Antwerpen: BMP.
12.
Carnoy, M. (1984) Gramsci and the state, in: M. Carnoy (Ed.) The State and Political Theory, pp. 65-88. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Ceuppens, A. (1981) Evolutie van de Sociale Woningbouw te Antwerpen [The evolution of social housing in Antwerp]. Gent: RUG.
14.
Christiaens, E., Moulaert, F. and Bosmans, B. (2007) The end of social innovation in urban development strategies? The case of Antwerp and the neighbourhood development association BOM, European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), pp. 238-251.
15.
Coninck, M. de and Vandenberghe, J. (1996) Het sociaal impulsfonds: een instrument voor het stedelijk beleid [The social impulse fund: an instrument for urban policy]. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap , Brussels.
16.
Cools, B. (1994) In Naam van de Stad [In the name of the city]. Antwerp-Baarn: Hadewijch.
17.
Cox, R. (1983) Gramsci, hegemony, and international relations: an essay in method, in: R. Cox and T. Sinclair (Eds) Approaches to World Order, pp. 124-143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
De Bilzen (2002) Marshallplan voor Antwerpen-Noord [Marshall plan for Antwerp-North]. Unpublished document, Antwerp.
19.
De Bilzen (2006) Marshallplan voor Antwerpen-Noord [Marshall plan for Antwerp-North]. Unpublished document, Antwerp.
20.
Decker, P. de (1994a) Het herwaarderingsbesluit geherwaardeerd? [Renewing the renewal decree?], Ruimtelijke Planning, 2, pp. 85-93.
21.
Decker, P. de (1994b) Plangroep stad aan de stroom stopt [Plan group the city and the stream stops], Planologisch Nieuws, 14, pp. 74-77.
22.
Decker, P. de (1999) On the genesis of an urban policy in Flanders, Belgium, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 14, pp. 183-190.
23.
Decker, P. de, Kesteloot, C., Maesschalck, F. de and Vranken, J. (2005) Revitalising the city in an anti-urban context: extreme right and the rise of urban policies in Flanders, Belgium, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, pp. 152-171.
24.
Dewinter, F. (2006) Antwerpen Troef! [Antwerp first!]. Antwerp: Uitgeverij Egmont.
25.
Dorling, D. and Shaw, M. (2002) Geographies of the agenda: public policy, the discipline and its (re)turns, Progress in Human Geography, 26, pp. 627-646.
26.
Dutt,A. and Costa, F. (Eds) (1992) Perspectives on Planning and Urban Development in Belgium. Dordrecht: Springer.
27.
Gazet van Antwerpen (2005) Grootjans gaat in op vraag projectontwikkelaars [Grootjans responds to project developers' demands], 10 November (http://antwerpen.gva.be/nieuwsantwerpen/2005/11/10/grootjans-gaat-inop-vraag-projectontwikkelaars-antwerpen.html; accessed 23 March 2007).
28.
Gill, S. (2003) Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
Gramsci, A. (1975/2001) Quaderni del Carcere [Prison notebooks]. Turin: Einaudi.
30.
Hackworth, J. and Smith, N. (2001) The changing state of gentrification, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92(4), pp. 464-477.
31.
Herck, K. van and Avermaete, T. (2006) Wonen in Welvaart, 1945-1973 [Good living, 1945-1973] . Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010.
32.
Hertogen, J. (2006) Allochtonen redden democratie in Antwerpen [Allochtoneous save democracy in Antwerp], BuG36, NPData, Brussels.
33.
Hoefnagels, C. (2004) Theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek naar gentrification in Antwerpen [Theoretical and empirical study on gentrification in Antwerp]. Unpublished MA thesis, Erasmus UniversityRotterdam.
34.
Hove, E. van (2001) Networking Neighbourhoods. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
35.
Imrie, R. (2004) Urban geography, relevance and resistance to the `policy turn', Urban Geography, 25(8), pp. 697-708.
36.
Ives, P. (2004) Language and Hegemony in Gramsci. London: Pluto Press.
37.
Janssens, P. (2005) De Stad wor Azzek zen Gebore [The city where I was born]. Antwerp: BMP.
38.
Janssens, P. (2006) Het Beste Moet Nog Komen [The Best is Yet to Come] . Antwerp: BMP.
39.
Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
40.
Jessop, B. (1997) A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects and governance, in: M. Lauria (Ed.) Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy, pp. 51-73. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
Jessop, B. (2002a) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
Jessop, B. (2002b) The political scene and the politics of representation: periodising class struggle and the state in the eighteenth Brumaire, in: M. Cowling and J. Martin (Eds) Marx's Eighteenth Brumaire: (Post-)modern Interpretations, pp. 179-194. London : Pluto Press.
43.
Jessop, B. (2005) Gramsci as a spatial theorist, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8, pp. 421-437.
44.
Lauwers, L. (2008) Verhuiseffecten van stadsontwikkeling in Antwerpen: een kwantitatief onderzoek naar intrastedelijke migratiepatronen [Displacement through urban development in Antwerp: a quantitative analysis of intra-urban migration patterns]. Unpublished MA thesis, Free University of Brussels.
45.
Lees, L. (2000) A reappraisal of gentrification: towards a `geography of gentrification', Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), pp. 389-408.
46.
Lees, L. (2003) Policy (re-)turn: gentrification research and urban policy-urban policy and gentrification research, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 571-574.
47.
Loopmans, M. (2006a) From residents to neighbours: the making of active citizens in Antwerp, Belgium, in: J. W. Duyvendak , T. Knijn and M. Kremer (Eds) Policy, People, and the New Professional: De-professionalisation and Re-professionalisation in Care and Welfare, pp. 109-121. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
48.
Loopmans, M. (2006b) Ondernemende burgers in ondernemende steden [Entrepreneurial citizens in entrepreneurial cities], Agora, 22(4), pp. 19-22.
49.
Loopmans, M. (2007) From SIF to city fund: a new direction for urban policy in Flanders, Belgium, Journal for Housing and the Built Environment, 22(2), pp. 215-225.
50.
Loopmans, M., Uitermark, J. and Maesschalck, F. de (2003) Against all odds: poor people jumping scales and the development of an urban policy in Flanders, Belgium, Belgeo, 2(3), pp. 243-258.
51.
Maesschalck, F. de and Loopmans, M. (2002) Herverdeling van middelen en mensen [Redistributing money and people], Rooilijn, 35(3), pp. 120-125.
52.
Maesschalck, F. de and Loopmans, M. (2003) Electoral geography and manifestos of new urban parties from 1977-1999: how urban are they really?, Belgeo , 3, pp. 329-342.
53.
Martin, R. (2001) Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda, Progress in Human Geography, 25, pp. 189-210.
54.
Martin, R. (2002) Response to Dorling and Shaw, Progress in Human Geography, 26, pp. 627-646.
55.
Massey, D. (2000) Editorial: practising political relevance, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, pp. 131-133.
56.
Massey, D. (2001) The Progress in Human Geography lecture: geography on the agenda, Progress in Human Geography, 25, pp. 5-17.
57.
Massey, D. (2002) Response to Dorling and Shaw, Progress in Human Geography, 26, pp. 627-646.
58.
Meulder, B. de (2006) De Belgische stedenbouw en de belofte van welvaart 1945-1975: 10 punten over de veranderende productie van het wonen [Belgian urban development and the promise of welfare 1945-1975: 10 remarks on the changing production of housing], in: K. van Herck and T. Avermaete (Eds) Wonen in Welvaart, 1945-1973, pp. 128-145. Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010.
59.
Moulaert, F. (2000) Globalisation and Integrated Area Development in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
Pacione, M. (1999) Relevance in human geography -special collection of invited papers: guest editorial, Scottish Geographical Journal, 115, pp. v-xiv.
61.
Pain, R. (2006) Social geography: seven deadly myths in policy research, Progress in Human Geography, 30, pp. 250-259.
62.
Pittillion, F., Wuyts, T. and Acker, M. van (2005) Bouwblokprojecten in Antwerpen [Building block projects in Antwerp]. Stad Antwerpen and Henri van de Velde Institute, Antwerp.
Sanders, C. (1986) Recente ontwikkelingen in de kantoorsector toegepast op Antwerpen [Recent developments in the office sector in Antwerp]. Unpublished MA thesis, Catholic University of Leuven.
65.
Schelde-Dijle vzw (1971) Leidraad voor de ontwikkeling van de kernstad Antwerpen. Schelde-Dijle vzw, Antwerp.
66.
Schuermans, N. and Maesschalck, F. de (2007) Extreem-rechts, etnocentrisme en onveiligheidsgevoelens op het Vlaamse platteland [The extreme right, ethnocentrism and feelings of insecurity in the Flemish countryside], Ruimte en Planning, 27(2), pp. 10-27.
67.
Slater, T. (2004) Municipally managed gentrification in South Parkdale , Toronto, The Canadian Geographer, 48(3), pp. 303-325.
68.
Slater, T. (2006) The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 30, pp. 737-757.
69.
Smit, K. de (2003) Hoe dol was Dolle Mina? De geschiedenis van de Dolle Mina's in Vlaanderen [How crazy were the Crazy Minas? The history of the Crazy Minas in Flanders]. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Ghent.
70.
Smith, N. (2002) New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as a global urban strategy, Antipode, 34, pp. 427-450.
71.
Stad aan de Stroom (1990) Een opening in de stad: bewonersverhalen voor de toekomst [Openings to the city: residents' stories for the future]. Stad aan de Stroom vzw, Antwerp.
72.
Stad Antwerpen (1973) Binnenstad Antwerpen: structuurschets [Structure plan for the Antwerp inner city]. Stad Antwerpen.
73.
Stad Antwerpen (1978) Structuurschetszuid [Structure plan for the south]. Stad Antwerpen.
74.
Stad Antwerpen (1980) Structuurschets Stuivenberg [Structure plan for Stuivenberg]. Stad Antwerpen .
75.
Stad Antwerpen (1985) Activiteitenverslag 1983- 1984-1985: planologie, huisvesting, milieu [Activity report 1983-1984-1984: planning, housing and environment]. Stad Antwerpen.
76.
Stad Antwerpen (1989) Zes jaar stadsvernieuwing: de nieuwe kleren van mijn buurt [Six years of urban renewal: new clothes for the neighbourhood]. Stad Antwerpen.
77.
Stad Antwerpen (2001) Bestuursakkoord 2001-2006 [Government agreement 2001-2006]. Stad Antwerpen .
78.
Stad Antwerpen (2005) Stadsplan veilig [Municipal security plan]. Stad Antwerpen.
79.
Stad Antwerpen and Gazet van Antwerpen (1998) Antwerpen: verhalen over buurten [Antwerp: stories about neighbourhoods]. Stad Antwerpen.
80.
Timmerman, G. (1994) De Uitverkoop van Antwerpen [Selling off Antwerp] . Berchem: EPO.
81.
Toubhans,W. and Lombaerde, P. (1993) Antwerpen, een moderne stad [Antwerp, a modern city], in: E. Taverne and I. Visser (Eds) Stedebouw, de Geschiedenis van de Stad in de Nederlanden van 1500 tot Heden [Urbanism, the history of the city in the Low Countries since 1500], pp. 314-327. Nijmegen: SUN.
82.
Uitermark, J., Duyvendak, J.W. and Kleinhans, R. (2007) Gentrification as a governmental strategy: social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam, Environment and Planning A, 39, pp. 1125-1141.
83.
Verhetsel, A. and Ceulemans, S. (1994) Stadsvernieuwing en speculatie op vastgoed: een gevalstudie: Sint-Andrieskwartier-Antwerpen [Urban renewal and real estate speculation: a case study in the Antwerp Sint-Andries quarter], Planologisch Nieuws, 14(3), pp. 111-126.
84.
Verschueren, J. (2003) Plaats voor de homo ludens! Vlaamse provo's als nieuwe sociale beweging in een ruimtelijk wereld-systeem-analytisch perspectief [Make way for the homo ludens! Flemish provo's as a new social movement in a spatial world-system perspective]. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Ghent.
85.
Ward, K. (2005) Geography and public policy: a recent history of `policy relevance', Progress in Human Geography, 29, pp. 310-319.
86.
Ward, K. (2006) Geography and public policy: towards public geographies , Progress in Human Geography, 30, pp. 495-503.
87.
Weesep, J. van (1994) Gentrification as a research frontier, Progress in Human Geography, 18, pp. 74-83.
88.
Wyly, L. and Hammel, D. (1999) Islands of decay in seas of renewal: urban policy and the resurgence of gentrification, Housing Policy Debate , 10, pp. 711-771.
89.
Wyly, L. and Hammel, D. (2001) Gentrification, housing policy, and the new context of urban redevelopment, in: K. Fox-Gotham (Ed.) Critical Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment, pp. 211-276. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
