In 1957 Chicago enacted a Comprehensive Amendment to the Chicago Zoning Ordiance of 1923. In contrast to the hierarchical zoning of the 1923 ordinance, the 1957 ordinance made each zoning category exclusive and mandated the removal of non-conforming uses. This study examines land parcels at the borders between residential and non-residential (commercial or manufacturing) zones, and finds that land values in non-residential zones enjoyed a one-time jump in growth over the time-period 1955—58 during which the 1957 ordinance was adopted. No significant change is detected in land value growth in residential zones. These results suggest that non-residential landowners valued the insurance that the 1957 ordinance provided against mixed land uses more than the value of the option to change land use that was terminated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Babcock, R. (1957) The new Chicago zoning ordinance, Northwestern University Law Review, 1, pp. 174-201.
2.
Chaddick, H.F. (1990) Chaddick! Success against all odds. Harry F. Chaddick Associates, Chicago, IL.
3.
City Council of Chicago, Committee on Building and Zoning (1952) A program for the rezoning of Chicago. Special Collections and Archives, DePaul University, Chicago, IL.
4.
City Council of Chicago, Committee on Building and Zoning (1955) Proposed comprehensive amendment to the Chicago zoning ordinance. Special Collections and Archives, DePaul University, Chicago, IL.
5.
Gerfin, M. and Lechner, M. (2002) A micro-econometric evaluation of the labor market policy in Switzerland, Economic Journal, 112, pp. 854-883.
6.
Heckman, J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error , Econometrica, 47, pp. 153-162.
7.
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. and Todd, P. (1998) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data, Econometrica, 66, pp. 1017-1098.
8.
Heckman, J., Smith, J. and Clements, N. (1997) Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts, Review of Economic Studies, 64, pp. 487-535.
9.
Jalan, J. and Ravallion, M. (2003) Estimating the benefit incidence of an antipoverty program by propensity-score matching, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21, pp. 19-30.
10.
McDonald, J.F. (1979) Economic Analysis of an Urban Housing Market. New York: Academic Press.
11.
McDonald, J.F. (1981) Spatial patterns of business land values in Chicago , Urban Geography, 3, pp. 201-215.
12.
McDonald, J.F. and Bowman, H.W. (1979) Land value functions: a reevaluation, Journal of Urban Economics, 6, pp. 25-41.
13.
McDonald, J.F. and McMillen, D.P. (1998) Land values, land use, and the first Chicago zoning ordinance, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(2), pp. 135-150.
14.
McMillen, D.P. and McDonald, J.F. (1991) Urban land value functions with endogenous zoning , Journal of Urban Economics, 29, pp. 14-27.
15.
McMillen, D.P. and McDonald, J.F. (1993) Could zoning have increased land values in Chicago? , Journal of Urban Economics, 29, pp. 167-188.
16.
McMillen, D.P. and McDonald, J.F. (1999) Land use before zoning: the case of 1920s Chicago , Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, pp. 473-489.
17.
McMillen, D.P. and McDonald, J.F. (2002) Land values in a newly zoned city, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, pp. 62-72.
18.
Mills, E.S. (1969) The value of urban land, in: H. Perloff (Ed.) The Quality of the Urban Environment, pp. 231-253. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Olcott, G. (1953, 1956, 1959, 1962) Olcott's Land Values Blue Book of Chicago and Suburbs. Chicago, IL: G. C. Olcott and Co.
20.
Pogodzinski, J.M. and Sass, T.R. (1990) The economic theory of zoning: a critical review , Land Economics, 66, pp. 294-314.
21.
Pogodzinski, J.M. and Sass, T.R. (1991) Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: a survey, Urban Studies, 28, pp. 597-621.
22.
Reed, W.R. and Rogers, C.L. (2003) A study of quasi-experimental control group methods for estimating policy impacts, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, pp. 3-25.
23.
Rephann, T.and Isserman, A. (1994) New highways as economic development tools: an evaluation using quasi-experimental matching methods, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, pp. 723-751.
24.
Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, pp. 41-55.
25.
Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, pp. 516-524.
26.
Schwieterman, J.P. and Caspall, D.M. (2006) The Politics of Place: A History of Zoning in Chicago, ed. by Jane Heron.Chicago, IL: Lake Claremont Press.
27.
Siegan, B. (1972) Land Use without Zoning, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Co.
28.
Thrall, G. (1987) Land Use and Urban Form. New York: Methuen.
29.
Wallace, N.E. (1988) The market effects of zoning undeveloped land: does zoning follow the market?, Journal of Urban Economics , 23, pp. 307-326.
30.
White, M. and Killeen, J. (2002) The effect of careers guidance for employed adults on continuing education: assessing the importance of attitudinal information , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 165, pp. 83-95.
31.
Yeates, M.H. (1965) Some factors affecting the spatial distribution of Chicago land values 1910-1960, Economic Geography, 41, pp. 57-70.
