Research into land use—transport relationships through the lens of the jobs—housing balance and the closely related excess commuting framework continues to draw substantial interdisciplinary attention. There have been several recent research efforts aimed at extending the excess commuting framework and its GIS-based spatial models to more prescriptive, policy-relevant situations. This paper puts forward the idea of a theoretical `optimal' urban jobs—housing balance and proposes a new spatial model for finding it. The developed model treats the region's theoretical minimum commute as a baseline indicator of the jobs—housing balance. Alternative patterns of workers and jobs are simulated in order to improve this indicator. The model is demonstrated in several scenarios using data from the decennial US census (2000). Results demonstrate the model's capability for finding `optimal' spatial distributions of jobs and housing, as well as pointing out inefficiencies in existing urban structure. Summary remarks and suggestions for future research are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atash, F. (1996) Reorienting metropolitan land use and transportation policies in the USA, Land Use Policy, 13(1), pp. 37-49.
2.
Badoe, D.A. and Miller, E.J. (2000) Transportation- land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling, Transportation Research Part D, 5(4), pp. 235-263.
3.
Boarnet, M. and Crane, R. (2001) The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies, Transportation Research Part A , 35(9), pp. 823-845.
4.
Cervero, R. (1989) Jobs-housing balancing and regional mobility, Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(2), pp. 136-150.
5.
Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2006) Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), pp. 475-490.
6.
Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research Part D, 2(3), pp. 199-219.
7.
Charron, M. (2007) From excess commuting to commuting possibilities: more extension to the concept of excess commuting, Environment and Planning A, 39(5), pp. 1238-1254.
8.
Frost, M., Linneker, B. and Spence, N. (1998) Excess or wasteful commuting in a selection ofBritish cities, Transportation Research Part A, 32(7), pp. 529-538.
9.
Giuliano, G. and Small, K.A. (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure , Urban Studies, 30(9), pp. 1485-1500.
10.
Hamilton, B.W. (1982) Wasteful commuting, Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), pp. 1035- 1053.
11.
Hamilton, B.W. (1989) Wasteful commuting again, Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), pp. 1497-1504.
12.
Horner, M.W. (2002) Extensions to the concept of excess commuting, Environment and Planning A, 34(3), pp. 543-566.
13.
Horner, M.W. (2004a) Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure, Urban Geography, 25(3), pp. 264-284.
14.
Horner, M.W. (2004b) Spatial dimensions of urban commuting: a review of major issues and their implications for future geographic research, Professional Geographer, 56(2), pp. 160-173.
15.
Horner, M.W. (2007) A multi-scale analysis of urban form and commuting change in a small metropolitan area (1990-2000), Annals of Regional Science, 41(1), pp. 315-322.
16.
Horner, M.W. and Mefford, J.N. (2007) Investigating urban spatial mismatch issues using jobs-housing indicators to model home-work separation, Environment and Planning A, 39(6), pp. 1420-1440.
17.
Horner, M.W. and Murray, A.T. (2002) Excess commuting and the modifiable areal unit problem, Urban Studies, 39(1), pp. 131-139.
18.
Horner, M.W. and Murray, A.T. (2003) A multi-objective approach to improving regional jobs-housing balance, Regional Studies, 37(2), pp. 135-146.
19.
Horner, M.W. and O'Kelly, M.E. (2007) Is non-work travel excessive? , Journal of Transport Geography, 15(6), pp. 411-416.
20.
Kim, S. (1995) Excess commuting for 2-worker households in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, Journal of Urban Economics , 38(2), pp. 166-182.
21.
Levine, J. (1998) Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance , Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), pp. 133-149.
22.
Levine, J. and Inam, A. (2004) The market for transportation-land use integration: do developers want smarter growth than regulations allow?, Transportation, 31(4), pp. 409-427.
23.
Levinson, D.M. (1998) Accessibility and the journey to work, Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), pp. 11-21.
24.
Ma, K.R. and Banister, D. (2006) Excess commuting: a critical review, Transport Reviews, 26(6), pp. 749-767.
25.
Merriman, D., Ohkawara, T.and Suzuki, T. (1995) Excess commuting in the Tokyo metropolitan area: measurement and policy simulations, Urban Studies, 32(1), pp. 69-85.
26.
Niedzielski, M.A. (2006) A spatially disaggregated approach to commuting efficiency, Urban Studies, 43(13), pp. 2485-2502.
27.
O'Kelly, M.E. and Lee, W. (2005) Disaggregate journey-to-work data: implications for excess commuting and jobs-housing balance, Environment and Planning A, 37(12), pp. 2233-2252.
28.
Peng, Z.R. (1997) The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting, Urban Studies, 34(8), pp. 1215-1235.
29.
Rodríguez, D.A. (2002) Examining individuals' desire for shorter commute: the case of proximate commuting, Environment and Planning B, 29(6), pp. 867-881.
30.
Rodríguez, D.A. (2004) Spatial choices and excess commuting: a case study of bank tellers in Bogotá, Colombia, Journal of Transport Geography, 12(1), pp. 49-61.
31.
Schwanen, T. (2002) Urban form and commuting behaviour: a cross-European perspective, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie , 93(3), pp. 336-343.
32.
Scott, D.M., Kanaroglou, P.S. and Anderson, W.P. (1997) Impacts of commuting efficiency on congestion and emissions: case of the Hamilton CMA, Canada, Transportation Research Part D, 2(4), pp. 245-257.
33.
Scott, L.M. and Getis, A. (1998) Changing urban spatial structure and jobs/housing balance: the case of Los Angeles. Paper read at the Western Regional Science Conference, Monterrey, California , February.
34.
Shen, Q. (2000) Spatial and social dimensions of commuting, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), pp. 68-82.
35.
Small, K.A. and Song, S. (1992) Wasteful commuting: a resolution, Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), pp. 888-898.
36.
Sultana, S. (2002) Job/housing imbalance and commuting time in the Atlanta metropolitan area: exploration of causes of longer commuting time , Urban Geography, 23(8), pp. 728-749.
37.
Wachs, M., Taylor, B.D., Levine, N. and Ong, P. (1993) The changing commute: a case study of the jobs-housing relationship over time, Urban Studies, 30(10), pp. 1711-1729.
38.
Wang, F.H. (2001) Explaining intraurban variations of commuting by job proximity and workers' characteristics, Environment and Planning B, 28(2), pp. 169-182.
39.
White, M.J. (1988) Urban commuting journeys are not wasteful, Journal of Political Economy, 96(5), pp. 1097-1110.
