This paper investigates the long-run convergence of regional house prices in the UK. Existing studies have failed to reach a consensus on whether or not regional house prices exhibit long-run convergence with each other. The application is proposed of a new test involving unit root testing of the first principal component based on regional—national house price differentials. Using mix-adjusted quarterly data for 1973—2006, it is found that the first principal component is stationary. This suggests that all UK regional house prices are driven by a single common stochastic trend. Further analysis suggests that those regions that are more distant from London exhibit the highest degrees of persistence with respect to deviations in house price differentials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, C. and Barrow, M. (1994) Seasonality and co-integration of regional house prices in the UK, Urban Studies, 31, pp. 1667-1689.
2.
Ashworth, J. and Parker, S. (1997) Modelling regional house prices in the UK, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44, pp. 225-246.
3.
Bai, J. (2004) Estimating cross-section common stochastic trends in nonstationary panel data, Journal of Econometrics, 122, pp. 137-183.
4.
Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2004) A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration , Econometrica, 72, pp. 1127-1178.
5.
Child, D. (1970) The Essentials of Factor Analysis. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
6.
Cook, S. (2003) The convergence of regional house prices in the UK, Urban Studies, 40, pp. 2285-2294.
7.
Cook, S. (2005a) Detecting long-run relationships in regional house prices in the UK, International Review of Applied Economics , 19, pp. 107-118.
8.
Cook, S. (2005b) Regional house price behaviour in the UK: application of a joint testing procedure, Physica A, 345, pp. 611-621.
9.
Cook, S. and Thomas, C. (2003) An alternative approach to examining the ripple effect in UK house prices, Applied Economics Letters, 10, pp. 849-851.
10.
Drake, L. (1995) Testing for convergence between UK regional house prices, Regional Studies, 29, pp. 357-366.
11.
Elliott, G., Rothenburg, T. and Stock, J. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root , Econometrica, 64, pp. 813-836.
12.
Engle, R. and Granger, C. (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, 55, pp. 251-276.
13.
Ferré, M. (2004) The Johansen Test and the transitivity property , Economics Bulletin, 3, pp. 1-7.
14.
Hadri, K. (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data, Econometrics Journal, 3, pp. 148-161.
15.
Hall, S., Lavarova, S. and Urga, G. (1999) A principal components analysis of common stochastic trends in heterogeneous panel data: some Monte Carlo evidence, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp. 749-767.
16.
Holmans, A. (1990) House price changes through time at national and sub-national level. Working Paper No. 110, Government Economic Service. London: HMSO.
17.
Holmes, M.J. and Grimes, A. (2005) Is there long-run convergence of regional house prices in the UK? Motu Working Paper No. 2005-11 ( http://ideas.repec.org/p/mtu/wpaper/05_11.html).
18.
Im, K., Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels , Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53-74.
19.
Johansen, S. (1988) Statistical analysis of co-integrating vectors , Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp. 231-254.
20.
Levin, A., Lin, C. and Chu, C.-S. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108, pp. 1-24.
21.
MacDonald, R. and Taylor, M. (1993) Regional house prices in Britain: long-run relationships and short-run dynamics, Scottish Journal of Political Economy , 40, pp. 43-55.
22.
Meen, G. (1999) Regional house prices and the ripple effect: a new interpretation, Housing Studies, 14, pp. 733-753.
23.
Moon, H.R. and Perron, B. (2002) Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Working Paper No. 2002-18, Cahiers de recherche, Département de Sciences Economiques, Université de Montreal.
24.
Ng, S. and Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power, Econometrica, 69, pp. 1519-1554.
25.
Petersen, W., Holly, S. and Gaudoin, P. (2002) Further work on an economic model of the demand for social housing. Report to theDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
26.
Phillips, P.C.B. and Sul , D. (2002) Dynamic panel testing and homogeneous testing under cross-section dependence . Discussion Paper No. 1362, Cowles Foundation, Yale University .
27.
Snell, A. (1996) A test of purchasing power parity based on the largest principal component of real exchange rates of the main OECD economies , Economics Letters, 51, pp. 225-231.
28.
Snell, A. (1999) Testing for r versus r-1 cointegrating vectors , Journal of Econometrics, 88, pp. 151-191.
29.
Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (1988) Testing for common trends, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, pp. 1097-1107.
