Conventional wisdom suggests that the increasing decentralisation of population and employment in US metropolitan areas is to blame for declining public transit mode shares and deteriorating system productivity. Proponents of this view assert that transit performs best when it connects suburbs to central business districts in more centralised urban environments. Our time-series analysis of transit patronage in Atlanta suggests that the previously reported secular decline in transit patronage is attributable to employment decentralisation outside the MARTA service area but that this can be reduced if the transit system makes decentralising employment reachable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atlanta Regional Commission (2006a) ARC employment data (personal e-mail communications with Mike Carnathan of ARC on 31 May 2006 and 1 June 2006).
2.
Atlanta Regional Commission (2006b) Transit shapefiles (personal e-mail communications with Jim Bohn of ARC on 20 June 2006).
3.
Brown, J. and Thompson, G.L. (2005) Examining the influence of multidestination service orientation on transit productivity change: a multivariate analysis. Working Paper, Florida Planning and Development Laboratory, Florida State University.
4.
Brown, J. and Thompson, G.L. (2007) Service orientation, bus-rail service integration, and transit performance: an examination of 45 U.S. metropolitan areas. Working Paper, Florida Planning and Development Laboratory, Florida State University.
5.
Downs, A. (2004) Still Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-hour Traffic Congestion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation) ( 2005) Florida transit information system 2005 (http://lctr.eng.fiu.edu/ftis/).
7.
Ferreri, M.G. (1992) Comparative costs, in: G. E. Gray and L. A. Hoel (Eds) Public Transportation, 2nd edn, pp. 245-271). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
Gomez-Ibanez, J.A. (1996) Big-city transit ridership, deficits, and politics: avoiding reality in Boston, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(1), pp. 30-50.
9.
Jones, D.( 1985) Urban Transit Policy: An Economic and Political History . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
10.
Kain, J.F. (1997) Cost-effective alternatives to Atlanta's rail rapid transit system, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy , 31(January), pp. 25-49.
11.
Kimpel, T.J. (2001) Time point-level analysis of transit service reliability and passenger demand. PhD thesis, Portland State University .
12.
MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) (2006) Linked passenger trips by mode, passenger fare revenue by mode, and vehicle service kilometers by mode (personal e-mail communications with Robert Thomas of MARTA on 6 June 2006 and 7 June 2006).
13.
Meyer, J.R. and Gomez-Ibanez, J. (1981) Autos, Transit, and Cities . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Meyer, J., Kain, J.F. and Wohl, M. (1965) The Urban Transportation Problem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Pisarski,A. (1996) Commuting in America II. Eno Foundation, Washington, DC.
16.
Pucher, J. and Renne, J.L. (2003) Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NHTS, Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), pp. 49-78.
17.
Pucher, J., Markstedt,A. and Hirschman, I. (1983) Impacts of subsidies on the costs of urban public transport, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 17(2), pp. 155-176.
18.
Pushkarev, B. and Zupan, J. (1977) Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
19.
Pushkarev, B. and Zupan, J. (1980) Urban Rail in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
20.
Skinner, J. (2006) History of transit in Atlanta. Working Paper, Florida Planning and Development Laboratory, Florida State University .
21.
SPSS Inc. (2004) SPSS Trends 13.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
22.
Taylor, B.D. (1991) Unjust equity: an examination of California's Transportation Development Act, Transportation Research Record, 1297, pp. 85-92.
23.
Thompson, G.L. (2006) Summary of conversations about transit ridership in Dallas (document drawn from telephone conversations with: Gary Hufstedler of Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 5 June 2006; and Ernest Lloyd and Sonya Smith of the City of Dallas Office of Economic Development, 5 June 2006).
24.
Thompson, G.L. and Brown, J. (2006) Explaining variation in transit ridership change in U.S. metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000: a multivariate analysis, Transportation Research Record, 1986, pp. 172-181.
25.
Thompson, G.L. and Matoff, T. (2003) Keeping up with the Joneses: planning for transit in decentralizing regions, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), pp. 296-312.
26.
Thompson, G., Brown, J., Sharma, R. and Scheib, S. (2006) Where transit use is growing: surprising results , Journal of Public Transportation, 9(2), pp. 25-43.
27.
Tri-Met (2007) Tri-Met fixed route service and ridership information (http://www.tri-met.org ; accessed 26 June 2007).
28.
TRL (Transport Research Laboratory Ltd) (2004 ) The demand for public transport: a practical guide. Report No. 593, TRL, Crowthorne.
29.
US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2007) Per capita income by MSA (retrieved from on-line data; http://www.bea.gov; accessed 30 January 2007).
30.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2006) Atlanta MSA Motor Fuel Price Index 1978-2005 and Atlanta MSA CPI-U All Goods 1913-2005 (retrieved from on-line data; http://www.economagic . com website; accessed 31 May 2006).
31.
US Bureau of the Census (1967, 1972,1977,1982) Census of governments . Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
32.
US Bureau of the Census (1970-79) County business patterns: Georgia. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
33.
US Bureau of the Census (2006) Population by county: 1970-2005 (constructed from on-line data: 1970s intercensal population estimates, 1980s intercensal population estimates, 1990s intercensal population estimates and 2001-2005 population estimates; http://www.census.gov; accessed 31 May 2006).
