This article examines how changes in US metropolitan spatial structure lead to an increase in measurable excess commuting and a decrease in measurable transport—land use connections. Using Boston and Atlanta as two comparative regions, this research computes excess commuting with three-decade census data and then examines excess commuting in relation to the changes in metropolitan spatial structure. Empirical results suggest that the transport—land use connection appears weaker over the decades as the dispersion of jobs changes the dynamics of commuting and the selection of residential location follows patterns of average job location rather than that of the closest available job location. This decreasing transport—land use connection points to a spatial structure effect apart from individual preferences. It also suggests an alternative view of excess commuting for metropolitan transport policy-making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy (2000 ) Moving beyond sprawl: the challenge for metropolitan Atlanta . The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
2.
Cervero, R. (1996) Job—housing balance revisited: trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 492—511.
3.
Cervero, R. and Landis, J. (1995) The transportation —land use connection still matters, Access, 7, pp. 1—10.
4.
Crane, R. (1996) The influence of uncertain job location on urban form and the journey to work, Journal of Urban Economics, 39, pp. 342—356.
5.
Evans, S. (1973) A relationship between the gravity model for trip distribution and the transportation problem in linear programming, Transportation Research, 7, pp. 39—61.
6.
Frost, M., Linneker, B. and Spence, N. (1998) Excess or wasteful commuting in a selection of British Cities, Transportation Research A, 32, pp. 529—538.
7.
Giuliano, G. (1995) The weakening transportation— land use connection , Access, 6, pp. 3—11.
8.
Giuliano, G. and Small, K.A. (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?, UrbanStudies, 30, pp. 1485—1500.
9.
Gordon, P. and Richardson, H.W. (1996) Beyond polycentricity: the dispersed metropolis, Los Angles, 1970—1990, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 289—295.
10.
Hamilton, B.W. (1989) Wasteful commuting again, Journal of Political Economy, 97, pp. 1498—1504.
11.
Holzer, H. (1991) The spatial mismatch hypothesis, UrbanStudies, 28, pp. 105—122.
12.
Horner, M. and Murray, A. (2002) Excess commuting and modifiable area unit problem, UrbanStudies, 39, pp. 131—139.
13.
Horner, M.W. (2002) Extensions to the concept of excess commuting, Environment and Planning A, 34, pp. 543—566.
14.
Kim, S. (1995) Excess commuting for two-worker households in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, Journal of Urban Economics , 38, pp. 166—182.
15.
Levine, J., Inam, A. and Torng, G.W. (2005) A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives: evidence from Boston and Atlanta, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, pp. 317—330.
16.
Levinson, D. (1998) Accessibility and the journey to work, Journal of TransportGeography, 6, pp. 11—21.
17.
Ma, K.R. and Banister, D. (2006) Excess commuting: a critical review, Transport Reviews, 26(6), pp. 749—767.
18.
MAPC (Boston Metropolitan Area Planning Council) (2005) The resonance of the region: a report on metrofuture polling and survey efforts. MAPC, Boston, MA.
19.
McGuckin, N. and Srinivasan, N. (2003) Journey-to-work trends in the United States and its major metropolitan areas, 1960—2000. Report prepared forUS Department of Transportation.
20.
Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1999) Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Auto Dependence . Washington, DC: Island Press .
21.
Niedzielski, M.A. (2006) A spatially disaggregated approach to commuting efficiency, UrbanStudies, 43, pp. 2485—2502.
22.
O'Kelly, M.E. and Lee, W. (2005) Disaggregate journey-to-work data: implications for excess commuting and jobs—housing balance, Environment and Planning A, 37, pp. 2233—2252.
23.
Peng, Z.R. (1997) Jobs—housing balance and urban commuting, UrbanStudies, 34, pp. 1215—1235.
24.
Rodríguez, D. (2004) Spatial choices and excess commuting: a case study of bank tellers in Bogotá, Colombia, Journal of TransportGeography, 12, pp. 49—61.
25.
Scott, D.M., Kanaroglou, P.S. and Anderson, W.P. (1997) Impacts of commuting efficiency on congestion and emissions: case of the Hamilton CMA, Canada, Transportation Research Part D, 2, pp. 245—257.
26.
Shen, Q. (2000) Spatial and social dimensions of commuting, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, pp. 68—82.
27.
Sultana, S. (2005) Racial variations in males' commuting times in Atlanta: what does the evidence suggest?, The Professional Geographer, 57, pp. 66—82.
28.
Wang, F. (2001) Explaining intra-urban variations of commuting by job accessibility and worker characteristics, Environment and Planning B, 28, pp. 169—182.
29.
White, M.J. (1988) Urban commuting journeys are not wasteful, Journal of Political Economy, 96, pp. 1097—1110.
30.
Wilson, A.G. (1970) The use of the concept of entropy in system modeling, OperationResearch Quarterly, 21, pp. 247—265.
31.
Yang, J.W. (2005) The commuting impacts of spatial decentralization: a comparison of Boston and Atlanta, Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 35, pp. 69—78.
32.
Yang, J.W. and Ferreira, J.R. (2005) Evaluating measures of job—housing proximity: Boston and Atlanta, 1980—2000, in: K. Krizek and D. Levinson (Eds) Access to Destinations, pp. 171—193. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
33.
Yang, J.W. and Ferreira, J.R. (2007) Choices vs. choice sets: a commuting spectrum method for representing job—housing possibilities, Environment and Planning B (forthcoming).
