As court-ordered busing for school desegregation comes to an end, school boards are faced with strong public pressures to return to neighborhood schools. Analysis of public opinion data from Nashville, Tennessee, indicates a division between two broad constituencies. Individuals who favor neighborhood schools are drawn from those with traditional religious values: They support school prayer and creationism but abhor diversity in schools. Those who reject neighborhood schools and prefer better academic programs at schools farther away tend to be those of childbearing age but without children, those with children already in public schools, and those who are better educated. Surprisingly, race and racial attitudes are not significantly related to a preference for neighborhood schools. The authors conclude that the dynamics of educational policy in Nashville have undergone a significant transformation: Previous Black-White struggles have been replaced by shifting coalitions that extend across racial lines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Averill, L. J. (1989). Religious right; religious wrong: A critique of the fundamentalist phenomenon. New York: Pilgrim.
2.
Berger, M. A. (1982). Neighborhood schools: The new, legal response to enrollment decline and desegregation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
3.
Bridge, R. G. , & Blackman, J. (1978). A study of alternatives in American education: Family choice in schooling (Vol. 4). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
4.
Chubb, J. , & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Clerico, D. R. (1983). Searching for peace of mind: Parents’ rationales for enrolling their children in a Christian school. Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University. Abstract in Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 2163A.
6.
Coleman, J. S. , & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Cookson, P. W. (1994). School choice: The struggle for the soul of American education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Dougherty, K. J. , & Sostre, L. (1992). Minerva and the market: The sources of the movement for school choice. In P. Cookson (Ed.), The choice controversy (pp. 24-41). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
9.
Dowell v. Board of Education, 890 F.2d 1483, 1490 (10th Cir. 1989).
10.
Fuller, B. , & Elmore, R. F. (Eds.). (1996). Who chooses? Who loses?New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Fuller, B. , Elmore, R. F., & Orfield, G. (1996). Policy-making in the dark: Illuminating the school choice debate. In B. Fuller & R. F. Elmore (Eds.)., Who chooses? Who loses? (pp. 1-24). New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Gaddy, B. B. , Hall, T. W., & Marzano, R. J. (1996). School wars. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Gamble, C. (1996, October 2). Neighborhood school gains not realized, study finds. Education Week, 16(5), 6.
14.
Hendrie, C. (1996, April 24). Neighborhood schools proposal in Pittsburgh stirs outcry. Education Week, 15(31), 7.
15.
Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Lee, V. E. , Croninger, R., & Smith, J. B. (1996). Equity and choice in Detroit. In B. Fuller & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? (pp. 70-91). New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
Lindsay, D. (1996, March 20). GOP not walking in lock step on school issues. Education Week, 15(20), 16-20.
18.
MacLeod, J. (1995). Ain’t no making it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Maddaus, J. (1988). Families, neighborhoods and schools: Parental perspectives and actions regarding choice in elementary school enrollment. Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University. Abstract in Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 477A.
20.
Maddaus, J. (1990). Parental choice of school: What parents think and do. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 267-295). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
21.
Marsden, G. (1993). The religious right: A historical overview. In M. Cromartie (Ed.), No longer exiles: The religious new right in American politics (pp. 1-16). Washington DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
22.
Martinez, V. , Godwin, K., & Kemerer, F. (1996). Public school choice in San Antonio: Who chooses and with what effects? In B. Fuller & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? (pp. 50-69). New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
McConahay, J. B. (1982). Self-interest versus racial attitudes as correlates of anti-busing attitudes in Louisville: Is it the buses or the Blacks?Journal of Politics, 44(3), 692-720.
24.
Nault, R. L. , & Uchitelle, S. (1982). School choice in the public sector: A case study of parental decision-making. In M. E. Manley-Casimir (Ed.), Family choice in schooling: Issues and dilemmas (pp. 85-98). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
25.
Olson, L. (1991). Voucher volcano. Church and State, 44(4), 7-10.
26.
Pride, R. A. , & Woodard, D. (1985). The burden of busing: The politics of desegregation in Nashville, Tennessee. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
27.
Rossell, C. H. (1985). What is attractive about magnet schools?Urban Education, 20(1), 7-22.
28.
Shaw, T. M. (1996, February 7). Brown was bigger than test scores. Education Week, 15, 42.
29.
Smith, K. B. , & Meier, K. J. (1995). The case against school choice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
30.
Sniderman, P. M. , & Hagan, M. G. (1985). Race and inequality: A study in American values. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
31.
Wells, A. S. (1996). African-American students’view of school choice. In B. Fuller & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? (pp. 25-49). New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
Wilcox, C. (1996). Onward Christian soldiers: The religious right in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
