The purpose of this research was to identify and analyze the mental frame works of urban elementary school principals to determine whet her they differ on the basis of majority (Anglo) or minority (Mexican American) group membership. Interviews were conducted with five male informants from each of the two ethnic groups using open-ended questions concerning typical duties, role relationships, problems, decision making, changes, and training. Although findings indicated many similarities among all of the principals, differences between ethnic groups were noted in the areas of tasks, role relationships, changes, and value statements. Most notable was the pressure felt by Mexican American principals to act as role models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barth, R. , & Deal, T. (1982, October). The principalship: Views from without and within. Paper prepared for the National Conference on the Principalship, National Institute of Education, Washington, DC.
2.
Brookover, W. B. , & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Urban Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 181 005)
3.
Deutscher, I. (1973). What we say/what we do: Sentiments and acts. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
4.
Doud, J. L. (1989). The K-8 principal in 1988. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.
5.
Edmonds, R. R. (1977). Search for effective schools: The identification and analysis of city schools that are instructionally effective for poor children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 142 610)
6.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Goodenough, R. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 675-694.
8.
Goodenough, W. H. (1957). Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), Report of the Seventh Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study (Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics No. 9). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9.
Krajewski, R. J. (1977, December). Texas principals-Implications for perceived roles. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 61(413), 16-21.
10.
Lomotey, K. (1989). Cultural diversity in the school: Implications for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 73(521), 81-88.
11.
McPardand, J. M. , & Slavin, R. E. (1990). Increasing achievement of at-risk students at each grade level: Policy perspectives series. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
12.
Mills, C. W. (1940, October). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
13.
Morris, V. C. , Crowson, R., & Porter-Gehrie, C. (1981). The urban principal: Discretionary decision-making in a large educational organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Pellicer, L. O. , Anderson, L. W., Keefe, J. W., Kelley, E. A., & McCleary, L. E. (1988). High school leaders and their schools. Vol. 1: A national profile. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
16.
Peterson, K. D. (1977-1978). The principal's task. Administrator's Notebook, 26(8), 1-4. Chicago, IL: Chicago Midwest Administration Center.
17.
Ramirez, M. , & Price-Williams, D. R. (1976). Cognitive styles of children of three ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5(2), 212-219.
18.
Schrnitt, N. (1980, October). Validation of the NASSP Assessment Center: An overview and some preliminary findings. NASSP Bulletin, 64(438), 107-117.
19.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1985). Landscapes, mindscapes, and reflective practice in supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1(1), 5-17.
20.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1991). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
22.
Slavin, R. E. , Karweit, N. L., & Madden, N. A. (1989). Effective programs for students at risk. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Smith, D. C. (1990). Principals for 2Ist century schools. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals.
24.
Spradley, J. P. (Ed.). (1972). Culture and cognition: Rules, maps, and plans. San FrancisCO:Chandler.
25.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
Taylor, S. J. , & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
27.
Venezky, R. L. , & Winfield, L. F. (1979). Schools that succeed beyond expectations in reading. Studies in Education. Newark: University of Delaware. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 484)
28.
Waber, D. P. (1977). Biological substrates of field dependence: Implications of the sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1076-1080.
29.
Yates, J. R. , & Ortiz, A. A. (1991). Professional development needs of teachers who serve exceptional language minorities in today's schools. Teacher Education and Special Education, 4, 11-18.
