The experiences and perspectives of four women who have exited urban school district superintendencies are examined in this article. Sources of disenchantment with the political aspects of the role are discussed Structural and sociocultural frameworks are used to interpret findings about women's continuing "outsider" status in educational leadership. The authors conclude by advocating increased attention to both the recruitment and retention of women and members of other underrepresented groups in the superintendency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bell, C. S. (1988). Organizational influences on women's experience in the superintendency. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(4), 31-59.
2.
Bell, C. S. (1989). [Essay review of] Charol Shakeshaft'sWomen in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 315-318.
3.
Bell, C. S. (in press). "If I weren't involved with schools, I might be a radical": An analysis of women superintendents' gender consciousness. In D. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women s leadership in education: Agenda for a new century. Albany: SUNY Press.
4.
Blumberg, A. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Bradley, A. (1991, January 30). Rapid turnover in urban superintendencies prompts calls for reforms in governance. Education Week pp.1, 34-35.
6.
Brown, O. S. , Peterkin, R. W., & Finkelstein, L. B. (1991, March 13). Urban CEOs: Untangling the governance knot. Education Week, pp. 38,40.
7.
Chase, S. , & Bell, C. (1990). Ideology, discourse, and gender: How gatekeepers talk about women school superintendents. Social Problems, 37(2), 163-177.
8.
Cibulka, J. G. , Reed, R. J., & Wong, K. (Eds.). (1992). The politics of urban education in the United States. London: Falmer.
9.
Council of Great City Schools . (1990). The condition of education in the great city schools: A ten year statistical profile 1980-1990. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Cuban, L. (1976). Urban school chiefs under fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Danzberger, J. , Kirst, M., & Usdan, M. (1992). Governing public schools: New times, new requirements. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
12.
Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
13.
Edson, S. (1987). Voices from the past: Tracking the female administrative aspirant. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 7(4), 261-277.
14.
Forsyth, P. B. , & Tallerico, M. (Eds.). (1993). City schools: Leading the way. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
15.
Frasher, R. , Frasher, J., & Hardwick, K. (1982). The female superintendent. Journal of NAWDAC, 46,36-42.
16.
Freeman, J. L. , Underwood, K. E., & Fortune, J. C. (1991). The demographics of school board service. American School Board Journal, 178(1), p. 34.
17.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
Gabler, J. (1987). Leadership: A woman's view. In L. Sheive & M. Schoenheit (Eds.), Leadership: Examining the elusive. Washington, DC: ASCD.
19.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
20.
Glass, T. E. (1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
21.
Guba, E. , & Lincoln, Y. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
22.
Gursky, D. (1992, April 8). Urban chiefs, boards agree on state of relations. Education Week, p. 15.
23.
Hennig, M. , & Jardim, A. (1977). The managerial woman. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
24.
Hochschild, A. (1973). Making it: Marginality and obstacles to minority consciousness. In R. B. Kundsin (Ed.), Women and success: The anatomy of achievement. New York: Wllliam Morrow.
25.
Hunter, R. C. (1990). The big city superintendent: Up against an urban wall. School Administrator, 47(5), 8-11.
26.
Jackson, B. L. (1978). Desegregation: Atlanta style. Theory Into Practice, 17, pp. 43-53.
27.
Jackson, B. L. , & Cibulka, J. (1992). Leadership turnover and business mobilization: The changing political ecology of urban school systems. In J. G. Cibulka, R. J. Reed, & K. Wong (Eds.), The politics of urban education in the United States. London: Falmer.
28.
Jones, E. , & Montenegro, X. P. (1990). Women and minorities in school administration. Washington, DC: American Association of School Administrators.
29.
Lincoln, Y S. (Ed.). (1985). Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Marshall, C. (1985). The stigmatized women: The professional women in a male sex-typed career. Journal of Educational Administration, 23(2), 131-152.
31.
National School Boards Association . (1992). Urban dynamics: Lessons in leadership from urban school boards and superintendents. Alexandria, VA: Author.
32.
Olson, L. (1991, January 30). School chief woes spur call for change in big-city boards. Education Week pp. 1, 16.
33.
Ortiz, F. I. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men, and minorities in public school administration. New York: Praeger.
34.
Ortiz, F. I. , & Marshall, C. (1988). Women in educational administration. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration. New York: Longman.
35.
Pitner, N. (1981). Hormones and harems: Are the activities of superintending different for a woman? In P. A. Schmuck, W. W. Charters, Jr., & R. O. Carlson (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials. New York: Academic Press.
36.
Rist, M. C. (1990, December). Race and politics rip into the urban superintendency. Executive Educator, 12-15.
37.
Samson, S. (1971). The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
Schuster, M. , & Van Dyne, S. (1984). Placing women in the liberal arts: Stages of curriculum transformation. Harvard Educational Review, 54(4), 413-428.
39.
Scott, H. (1980). The Black school superintendent: Messiah or scapegoat?Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
40.
Scott, J. (1988). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. Feminist Studies, 14, 33-50.
41.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration (updated ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Sizemore, B. (1986). The limits of the Black superintendency: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 6(3), 180-208.
43.
Tallerico, M. (1992). School board membership: Gender issues and women's perspectives. Urban Education, 26(4), 371-389.
44.
Tallerico, M. , Burstyn, J. N., & Poole, W. (1993). Gender and politics at work: Why women exit the superintendency (Research Monograph). Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for educational Administration.
45.
Tyack, D. (1975). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
