Many indexes suggest the existence of the bifurcation of the education profession into teaching (female dominated) and administration (male dominated). For numerous reasons, much of the historical research in educational administration has been dominated by the male experience and perspective. It is common knowledge that women have been excluded from the administrative ranks and other positions of authority in education. What we have witnessed is an absence of women from power. Recently, however, research on women in administration, management, and leadership has received increased attention, due primarily to social changes in the past decade. For example, the number of females in the workforce has increased substantially. More women than ever before are pursuing advanced degrees, and there has been a noticeable shift of females into business rather than education. This article examines the legal, historical, and pervasive under representation of women in administration, paying particular attention to women in urban settings. It also suggests changes in law, practice, and policy that may help to redress the inequity in administration in urban settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adkison, J. A. (1981). Strategies to promote women's careers in school administration. Administrator's Notebook, 29(2), 26-36.
2.
American Association of School Administrators . (1979). Survey shows male attitudes may hinder advancement. School Administrator, 45(6), 6.
3.
American Association of School Administrators . (1990). Women and minorities in school administration: Facts and figures 1989-1990. Arlington, VA: Office of Minority Affairs, American Association of School Administrators.
4.
Basse, B. M. , Krussell, J., & Alexander, R. A. (1977). Male managers' attitudes toward working women. American Behavioral Scientist, 15, 221-236.
5.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
6.
Byrne, D. R. , Hines, S. A., & McCleary, L. E. (1978). The senior high school principalship, Volume I: The national survey. Reston, VA: NASSP.
7.
Callahan, R. E. (1967). The superintendent of schools: An historical analysis. Final report, S-212. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education, HEW.
8.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Tide VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-(1), (2).
9.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX, 20 U.S.C. §1681(a) (1972).
10.
Civil Rights Act of 1991, Title II, The Glass Ceiling Act, 42 U.S.C. §2000e.
11.
Civil Rights Restoration Act, 20 U.S.C. §1687 (1987).
12.
Doughty, R. (1974). An exploration of some associations between student-community unrest and the promotion of Black administrators in public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
13.
Doughty, R. (1980). The Black female administrator: Woman in a double bind. In S. K. Biklen & M. B. Brannigan (Eds.), Women and educational leadership. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
14.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission . (1977). Employment opportunity in the schools: Job patterns of minorities and women in public elementary and secondary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. §206 (d)(1) (1963).
16.
Executive Order 11246,3 C.F.R. § 339 (1965).
17.
Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools, 112 S.Ct. 1028 (1992).
18.
Ginn, L. (1989). A quick look at the past, present, and future of women in public school administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 310 498)
19.
Grant, G. , & Martin, J. (1990). Sex discrimination in West Virginia principal hiring practices. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 328 982)
20.
Gross, N. , & Trask, A. (1976). The sex factor and the management of schools. New York: Wiley.
21.
Heid, C. A. (1989). Females in educational administration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
22.
Hyle, A. (1991). Women and public school administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 770)
23.
Irvine, J. J. (1978). A case of double jeopardy: The Black woman in higher educational administration. Emergent Leadership, 2(2), 61-66.
24.
Jones, E. , & Montenegro, X. (1983). Women and minorities in school administration: strategies for making a difference. Paper at a symposium of the National Institute on Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 237 607)
25.
Kanter, R. M. (1975). Women and the structure of organizations. In M. Millman & R. M. Kanter (Eds.), Another voice. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
26.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Kuh, G. , & McCarthy, M. M. (1989). Key factors in there form of administrative preparation programs. Planning and Changing, 20, 108-126.
28.
Lovelady-Dawson, F. (1980). Women and minorities in the principalship: Career opportunities and problems. NASSP Bulletin, 64(440), 18-28.
29.
Mertz, N. , & McNeely, S. (1987). Secondary schools in transition: A study of the emerging female administrator. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration, Gatlinburg, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289 239)
30.
National Longitudinal Survey (1967, 1977, 1986) [Machine-readable data file]. Columbus: Ohio State University.
31.
North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 (1982).
32.
Ortiz, F. I. (1982). Career paths in education: Women, men, and minorities in public school administration. New York: Praeger.
33.
Ortiz, F. I. , & Marshall, C. (1988). Women in educational administration. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 123-141). New York: Longman.
34.
Pavan, B. , & Robinson, R. (1991). Reflections of female school administrators regarding their careers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 676)
35.
Pounder, D. G. (1989). The gender gap in salaries of educational administration professors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(2), 181-201.
36.
Pounder, D. G. (1990). Educational megatrends and increased female leadership in school. Paper at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 325 928)
37.
Procedural regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 29 C.F.R. 1604.11.
38.
Revere, A. (1986). A description of Black female school superintendents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 269 891)
39.
Richards, C. (1988). The search for equity in educational administration: A commentary. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook on research in educational administration (pp. 159-168). New York: Longman.
40.
Rosen, B. , & Jerdee, T. J. (1974). Sex stereotyping in the executive suite. Harvard Business Review, 52, 45-48.
41.
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95-100.
42.
Sexual Harassment Free School Act, House Resolution 1795 (1993).
43.
Shakeshaft, C. (1979). Research on women in educational administration: A synthesis of findings and paradigm for future research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
44.
Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324-337.
46.
Spears v. Board of Education of Pike County, Kentucky, 843 F.2d 882 (6th Cir. 1988).
47.
Styer, S. (1989). Addressing women's issues in educational administration preparation programs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 738)
48.
Sullivan, L. (1992). The new workforce: Not just Rosie the Riveter. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 345 814)
49.
Taylor, S. (1977). The attitudes of superintendents toward the employment and effectiveness of women as public school administrators. In A. Fishel & J. Pottker (Eds.), Sex bias in the schools: The research evidence (pp. 300-310). Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses.
50.
Terborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(6), 647-664.
51.
University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 110 S.Ct. 577 (1990).
52.
Valverde, L. A. , & Brown, F. (1988). Influences on leadership development among racial and ethnic minorities. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 143-157). New York: Longman.
53.
Whitaker, K. , & Lane, K. (1990). Is a woman's place in school administration?School Administration, 47(2), 8-12.
54.
Young, D. (1973). The socialization of American minority peoples. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socializaton theory and research (pp. 1103-1140). Chicago: Rand McNally.
