Staggered schedules of schooling seem an attractive remedy for overcrowded schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alkin, M. , N. Atwood, E. Baker, W. Doby, and W. Doherty. 1984. Year-round schools program evaluation report.Los Angeles: Los Angeles Unified School District.
2.
Cannell, J. J.1988. Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all 50 states are above the national average. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice7:5-9.
3.
Crawford, A.1989. Integration evaluation report: Overcrowded school programs (1988-89). Report no. 548. Los Angeles Unified School District.
4.
Linn, R. , M. Graue, and N. Sanders. 1990. Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of claims that "everyone is above average."Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice9 (3): 5-14.
5.
National Commission on Excellence in Education . 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: GPO.
6.
National Education Association . 1987. What research says about year-round schools. NEA series 8. Washington, DC.
7.
Natriello, G. , E. McDill, and A. Pallas. 1990. Schooling disadvantaged children: Racing against catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Pelavin, S. H.1979. A study of year-round schools. 3 vols. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
9.
Quinlan, C. , C. George, and T. Emmett. 1987. Year-round education: Year-round opportunities. A study of year-round education in California. Report no. 143. Los Angeles: California State Department of Education.
10.
Scott, Foresman and Company . 1980. School attitude measure. Glenview, IL.
11.
Sizer, T. 1987. Keynote address. Symposium on School-Based Reform. National Education Association Conference in collaboration with the Coalition of Essential Schools and the National Network for Education Renewal, Minneapolis, MN, 8 October.
