Teacher ethos and ethics justify coercion, regimentation, depersonalization, andfailure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BLAU, P. (1967) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
2.
BLUMENSTEIL, A. (1968) Acquaintance: Structural and Relational Features of Laboratory Training. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
3.
DURKHEIM, E. (1956) Education and Sociology. New York: Free Press.
4.
GOFFMAN, E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday.
5.
KATZ, M. (1971) Class, Bureaucracy and the Schools. New York: Praeger.
6.
REDL, F. and D. WINEMAN (1965) Children Who Hate. New York: Free Press.
7.
ROTHSTEIN, S. W. (1975-1976) "Researching the Power Structure: Personalized Power and Institutionalized Charisma in the Principalship."Interchange6, 2: 41-48.
8.
ROTHSTEIN, S. W. (1979) "Orientations: First Impressions in an Urban Junior High School."Urban Education14, 1:91-116.
9.
ROTHSTEIN, S. W. (1984) The Power to Punish: A Social Inquiry into Coercion and Control in Urban Schools. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
10.
SCHUTZ, A. (1964) Collected Papers. The Hague, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.
11.
SIMMEL, G. (1964) The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Kurt Wolff, trans.). New York: Free Press.
12.
SUDNOW, D. (1972) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press.
13.
WALLER, W. (1932) The Sociology of Teaching. New York: Russell & Russell.
