The lay public's desire for school evaluation information is linked with parenthood, voting, the nature of the issue, and anticipated impact upon their children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BRASKAMP, L. A. , R. D. BROWN, and D. L. NEWMAN (1980) "Credibility of a local evaluation report: author source and client characteristics."Amer. Educ. Research J.15: 441-450.
2.
D. L. NEWMAN (1982) "Studying evaluation utilization through simulations."Evaluation Rev.6: 114-126.
3.
BROWN, R. D. , L. A. BRASKAMP, and D. L. NEWMAN (1978) "Evaluator credibility and acceptance as a function of report styles: do jargon and data make a difference?"Evaluation Q.2: 331-341.
4.
BROWN, R. D. , D. L. NEWMAN, and L. S. RIVERS (1980) "Perceived need for evaluation as influencers on an evaluation's impact."Educ. Evaluation and Policy Analysis2: 67-73.
5.
BROWN, R. D. (1984) "A decision-making context model for enhancing evaluation utilization."Educ. Evaluation and Policy Analysis6(4).
6.
BROWN, R. D. (1985) "Does superintendent's opinion affect school board's evaluation information needs? An empirical investigation."Urban Education20(2).
7.
BULL, K. S. and J. P. FEUQUAY (1980) "Causal attribution: a new scale developed to minimize existing methodological problems." Presented at the annual conference of the Southwestern Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.
8.
BULL, K. S. and D. L. NEWMAN (1985) "The effect of audience role and decision context on school evaluation needs." Presented at the annual meeting of American Education Research Association, Chicago.
9.
CARTER, R. K. (1971) "Client reactions to negative findings and the latent conservative function of evaluation studies."Amer. Sociologist6: 118-124.
10.
FEUQUAY, J. P. (1979) "Teacher's self-attributions and their projections of student attributions under varying conditions." Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
11.
FINN, J. (1974) A General Model for Multivariate Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
12.
FISHBEIN, M. and I.AJZEN (1975) Belief, Attitude Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
HOGARTH, R. M. (1980) Judgment and Choice: The Psychology of Decision. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
14.
JANIS, I. G. and L. MANN (1977) Decision-Making. New York: Free Press.
15.
LUTZ, F. W. and F. GARNON (1979) "Citizen participation in educational decisions."Planning and Changing10: 108-117.
16.
LUTZ, F. W. and A. GRESSON III. (1980) "Local school boards as political councils."Educ. Studies11: 125-144.
17.
NEWMAN, D. L. , R. D. BROWN, and M. LITTMAN (1979) "Evaluator report and audience characteristics which influence the impact of evaluation reports: does who says what to whom make a difference?"CEDR Q.12: 14-18.
18.
NEWMAN, D. L. , R. D. BROWN, and L. S. RIVERS (1983) "Locus of control and evaluation use: does sense of control affect information needs and decision making?"Studies in Educ. Evaluation9: 77-88.
19.
NEWMAN, D. L. and R. F. GLOCK (1983) "School boards' and administrators' use of evaluation information: influencing factors."Evaluation Rev.7: 110-125.
20.
NEWMAN, D. L. and K. S. BULL (1984) "Voting activity as influencers of evaluation needs." Presented at the annual meeting of Evaluation '84 Evaluation Network, San Francisco.
21.
NEWMAN, D. L.R. D. BROWN , and L. S. RIVERS (1984) "Locus of control as an influencer of school evaluation needs." Presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, New Orleans.
22.
STECHER, B. M. , M. C. ALKIN, and G. FLESHER (1981) Patterns of Information Use in School Level Decision-Making (Report 150), Center for Study of Evaluation, University of California-Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education.
23.
THOMPSON, P. , R. D. BROWN, and J. FERGASON (1981) "The impact of evaluation report styles on evaluation audiences: jargon and data do make a difference."Evaluation Rev.5: 269-279.
24.
VROOM, V. H. and A. G. JAGO (1974) "Decision-making as a social process: normative and descriptive models of leader behavior."Decision Sci.5: 743-768.
