Implementation of change encounters obstacles, has mixed results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
"The BAM Project" (1976) Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California at Los Angeles. (unpublished)
2.
BERLINER, D. (1978) "Changing academic learning time: clinical interventions in four classrooms." Presented at American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada, March.
3.
BLOOM, B. (1976) Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
BROOKOVER, W. B.et al. (1979) School Social Systems and Student Achievement. New York: Praeger. (A report of a study of the relationship of school social systems to school achievement in representative samples of Michigan Elementary Schools.)
5.
BROOKOVER, W. B. and L. W. LEZOTTE (1977) Changes in School Characteristics Coincident With Changes in Student Achievement, Executive Summary. College of Urban Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
6.
BROOKOVER, W. B., R. J. GIGLIOTTI, R. D. HENDERSON, and J. M. SCHNEIDER (1973) Elementary School Social Environment and School Achievement. Cooperative Research Project Report I-E-107, United States Office of Education.
7.
CHALUPSKY, A. B. and G. J. COLES (1977) "The unfulfilled promise of educational innovation." Presented at American Educational Research Association, New York.
8.
CRONBACH, L. J. , D. R. ROGOSA, R. E. FLODEN, and G. G. PRINCE (1976) "Analysis of covariance: angel of salvation or temptress and deluder?" Stanford Evaluation Consortium, Department of Education, Stanford University.
9.
EDMUNDS, R. R. (1979) "Some schools work and more can."Social Policy (March/April): 1-5.
10.
EMRICK, J. (1977) Evaluation of the National Diffusion Network, Volume I. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
11.
FAIRWEATHER, G. and L. TORNATZKY (1977) Experimental Methods for Social Policy Research. New York: Pergamon.
12.
GIACQUINTA, J. B. (1978) "Educational innovation in schools: some distressing conclusions about implementation." Presented at American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada, March.
13.
HALL, G. and S. F. LOUCKS (1977) "A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented."Amer. Edu. Research J.14, 2: 263-276.
14.
HAVELOCK, R. G. (1972) Training for Change Agents. Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK, Institute for Social Research.
15.
HOOVER, M. R. (1978) "Characteristics of black schools at grade level: a description."Reading Teacher, 31: 757-762.
16.
LEZOTTE, L. W. and J. PASSALACQUA (1978) "Individual school buildings: accounting for differences in measured pupil performance."Urban Education (October): 283-293.
17.
MILES, M. B. (1964) Innovation in Education. New York: Columbia University.
18.
ROETHLISBERGER, F. and W. DICKSON (1947) Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
19.
ROGERS, E. and F. SHOEMAKER (1971) Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
20.
RUTTER, M.et al. (1979) Fifteen Thousand Hours. London: Open Books.
21.
SCHMUCK, R. and M. MILES (1971) Organizational Development in Schools. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.
22.
SLAVIN, R. E. (1977) "A student team approach to teaching adolescents with special emotional and behavioral needs." Psychology in the Schools14, (January): 77-84.
23.
TORNATZKY, L. , G. W. FAIRWEATHER, E. FERGUS, and J. AVELLAR (1978) MSU-NIMH Innovation Diffusion Project: An Interim Report on Data Analysis. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University. (unpublished)
24.
WEBER, G. (1971) "Inner city children can be taught to read: four successful schools." Council for Basic Education Occasional Paper 18, Washington, D.C.
