Distribution formulas have made Congress' bias less obvious, but it has been, nevertheless, real.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BERKE, J. , S. SACKS, S. BAILEY, and A. CAMPBELL (1972) "Federal aid to public education: who benefits?" p. 27 in J. Berke and M. Kirst (eds.) Federal Aid to Education. Toronto: Lexington.
2.
BURNS, J. M. (1963) The Deadlock of Democracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Congressional Record (1974) H. 1530 (March 6).
4.
DYE, T. (1976) Policy Analysis. Tuscaloosa: Univ. of Alabama Press.
5.
EIDENBERG, E. and R. MOREY (1969) An Act of Congress. New York: Norton.
6.
HOFSTADTER, R. (1948) The American Political Tradition. New York: Alfred Knopf.
7.
HOLCOMBE, A. N. (1933) The New Party Politics. New York: Norton.
8.
MARWELL, G. (1967) "Party, region and the dimensions of conflict in the House of Representatives, 1949-1954."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.61: 380-399.
9.
MERANTO, P. (1967) The Politics of Federal Aid to Education in 1965. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press.
10.
NIE, N.et al. (1975) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
New York Times (1976) "Congressmen from northeast and midwest establish economic coalition." September 2.
12.
PARRIS, J. (1969) "Congress rejects the president's urban department/ 1961-1962," in F. Cleavelandet al. (eds.) Congress and Urban Problems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
13.
PATTERSON, J. (1967) Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal. Lexington: Univ. of Kentucky Press.
14.
U.S. Statistical Abstract (1975) Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
WOLFINGER, R. and J. HEIFETZ (1965) "Safe seats, seniority, and power in Congress."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.59: 337-349.
