Evaluation should be for a variety of purposes and a variety of clients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALKIN, M. C. (1969) "Evaluation theory development."Evaluation Comment2: 2-7.
2.
BLACK, H. (1963) They Shall Not Pass. New York: William Morrow.
3.
BLOOM, B. S. , J. T. HASTINGS, and G. F. MADAUS (1971) Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
CRONBACH, L. J. (1963) "Course improvement through evaluation."Teachers College Record64: 672-683.
5.
Educational Testing Service (1962) The Answer Sheet (June 8).
6.
FOX, R. S. , M. LUSZKI, and R. A. SCHMUCK (1966) Diagnosing Classroom Learning Environments. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
7.
GLASS, G. V. and B. R. WORTHEN (1972) "Educational evaluation and research: similarities and differences," in J. Weiss (ed.) Curriculum Theory Network Monograph Supplement; Curriculum Evaluation; Potentiality and Reality. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
8.
GUBA, E. G. and D. L. STUFFLEBEAM (1970) "Strategies for the institutionalization of the CIPP evaluation model." Address delivered at the Eleventh Annual PDK Symposium on Educational Research, Columbus, Ohio, June 1970.
9.
HOEPFNER, R. , P. A. BRADLEY, S. P. KELIN, and M. C. ALKIN (1973) CSE Elementary School Evaluation Kit: Needs Assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
HOFFMAN, B. (1962) The Tyranny of Testing. New York: Crowell-Collier-Macmillan.
11.
HOLT, J. (1969) The Underachieving School. New York: Dell.
12.
KAPLAN, A. (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.
13.
MANNELLO, G. (1969) "Grades must go."Educational Record50: 305-308.
14.
NEVO, D. (1974) "Evaluation priorities of students, teachers, and principals." Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
15.
NEVO, D. and D. L. STUFFLEBEAM (1976) "The availability and importance of evaluative information within the school."Studies in Educational Evaluation2: 203-209.
16.
REINHARD, D. L. (1972) "Methodology development for input evaluation using advocate and design teams." Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
17.
ROEDER, H. H. (1973) "Teacher curricula-your final grade is F."J. of Educational Measurement10: 141-143.
18.
SCHMUCK, R. A. , P. J. RUNKEL, S. L. SATUREN, R. T. MARTEL, and C. B. DERR (1972) Handbook of Organization Development in Schools. Palo Alto: National Press.
19.
SCRIVEN, M. (1967) "The methodology of evaluation," in R. E. Stake (ed.) Curriculum Evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Evaluation, No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally.
20.
SILBERMAN, C. E. (1970) Crisis in the Classroom. New York: Random House.
21.
SIMON, A. and E. G. BOYER [eds.] (1968) Mirrors for Behavior: An Anthology of Classroom Observation Instruments. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
22.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. (1975) "Evaluation as a community education process."Community Education J.5: 7-12, 19.
23.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. (1973) A Conceptualization of Evaluation. AERA Training Cassette Tapes, Series C. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
24.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. (1972) "The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability."SRIS Q.5: 3-8.
25.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. (1966) "A depth study of the evaluation requirement."Theory into Practice5: 121-133.
26.
STUFFLEBEAM, D. L. , W. J. FOLEY, W. J. GEPHART, E. G. GUBA, R. L. HAMMOND, H. O. MERRIMAN, and M. M. PROVUS (1971)Educational Evaluation and Decision Making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
27.
THORNDIKE, R. E. and E. HAGEN (1969) Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. New York: Wiley.
28.
TYLER, R. W. (1950) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
