URBAN STUDIES:The triform nature of Urban Studies: A general consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CAMPBELL, D. T. (1976)"Reforms or experiments."Urban Affairs Q.7,2 (December): 133-172.
2.
Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1972) The Campus and the City, Maximizing Assets and Reducing Liabilities. A Report and Recommendations by the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
COLEMAN, J. S. (1973) "The university and society's new demands upon it," in C. Kaxsen (ed.) Content and Conflict: Essays on College Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
COLEMAN, J. S. (1972) Policy Research in the Social Sciences. Morristown, NJ: General Learning 1'ress.
5.
DYE, I. (1972) `Policy analysis and political science: some interface problems."Policy Studies .1.1, 2 (Winter): 103-107.
6.
GREGG, P. M. [ed.] (1976) Problems of Theory in Policy Analysis. Lexington, MA: 1).C. Heath.
7.
POPENOE, D. (1969) "Urban studies centers in institutions of higher education: some thought on this structure, functions and problems."Urban Affairs Q.5,2 (December): 143-150.
8.
RANNEY, A. [ed.] (1968) Political Science and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: Markham.
9.
RICH. D. and R. WARREN (1976)"Urban affairs: discipline, profession, or academic casualty-." in D. Rich (ed.) Urban Affairs in Transition: Analysis and Commentary. Council of University Institutes for Urban Analysis (December): 4-24.
10.
SHAVER. P. and C. STAINES (1976) "Problems facing Campbell's `experimenting society'."Urban Affairs Q.7, 2 (December): 173-186.
