Union building representatives and principals: conflict or congruence? The data say the latter is true.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CHENG, C. (1976) "Community participation in teacher collective bargaining: problems and prospects."Harvard Educ. Rev.66 (May): 153-174.
2.
COCHRAN, W. (1954) "Some methods for strengthening the common X2 tests."Biometrics10 (March): 145-156.
3.
GLASSMAN, A. and J. BELASCO (1975) "Appealed grievances in urban education, a case study."Education and Urban Society7 (November): 78-87.
4.
GOLDBERG, A. and L. HARBATKIN (1970) "The teacher union chapter in the elementary school."Teachers College Record71 (May): 647-654.
5.
HOUGH, W. (1969) "A better curriculum through negotiations?"Educ. Leadership26 (March): 531-534.
6.
KARLITZ, H. (1976) "An analysis of the relationship between the position of United Federation of Teachers chapter chairperson and relative levels of decisional deprivation and attitudinal militancy." Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
7.
KLEINMAN, J. (1972) "Curriculum negotiations: how? To what end?"Educ. Leadership29 (April): 573-575.
8.
MADDEN, G. (1975) "A theoretical base for differentiating forms of collective bargaining in education."Educ. Admin. Q.5 (Spring): 76-90.
9.
MURPHY, M. and N. ELLMAN (1974) "The building principal and the union: a case study in mutual accommodation."Research Bull., Institute of Administrative Research, Teachers College, Columbia University14 (June): 3-5.
10.
ROBINSON, G. (1976) "Collective negotiations agreement for administrators: an analysis of 100 contracts."School Administrator33 (July-August): 4.
11.
SAUNDERS, R. and J. LOVELL (1969) "Negotiations: inevitable consequence of bureaucracy."Educ. Leadership26 (January): 351-354.
12.
SIEGEL, S. (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
YOUNG, W. (1972) "Curriculum negotiations: how? To what end?"Educ. Leadership29 (April): 576-578.