This case study examines how racial equity was constructed within a district-wide professional development program. Drawing on two years of observations, interviews, and artifacts of the Equity Mentoring and Coaching (EMC) Program, it examines (a) the available equity discourses, (b) their inter- and intra-organizational influences, and (c) their incorporation. Using a racialized ecological organizational lens, I detail four prevalent discourses: social transformation, antibias, diversity, and best practice; and their influences from EMC program positioning and partnerships. While all discourses used race-explicit language, I found that the nominal absorption of social transformational discourse into more technocratic conceptualizations hindered substantive racialized change.
AdmiraalW.SchenkeW.De JongL.EmmelotY.SligteH. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573
2.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
3.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. Routledge.
4.
ArtilesA. J. (2019). Understanding practice and intersectionality in teacher education in the age of diversity and inequality. Teachers College Record, 121, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100612
5.
AydarovaE. (2021). Building a one-dimensional teacher: Technocratic transformations in teacher education policy discourses. Educational Studies, 57(6), 670–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1969934
6.
AydarovaE. (2023). Intermediary organizations, technocratic discourses, and the rise of accountability regimes in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231174835
7.
BellJ. M.HartmannD. (2007). Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of “happy talk”. American Sociological Review, 72(6), 895–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200603
8.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
CareyA. J.LustickH.NoonanJ.PiazzaP. (2025). Red light! Green light! An analytic frame & learning device for race talk. Equity & Excellence in Education, 58(3), 178–190.https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2025.2490894
11.
CarpenterB. W.DiemS. (2015). Guidance matters: A critical discourse analysis of the race-related policy vocabularies shaping leadership preparation. Urban Education, 50(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914528719
12.
Carter AndrewsD. J.RichmondG. (2019). Professional development for equity: What constitutes powerful professional learning?Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 408–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119875098
13.
CoburnC. E. (2005). The role of nonsystem actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027001023
14.
Cochran-SmithM.KeefeE. S. (2022). Strong equity: Repositioning teacher education for social change. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 124(3), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221087304
15.
ComstockM. (2025). Negotiating equity: A critical policy analysis of equity sensemaking in district partnership initiatives. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251336728
16.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
17.
DeterdingN.WatersM. (2018). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 004912411879937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377
18.
DiamondJ.GomezL. (2023). Disrupting White supremacy and anti-Black racism in educational organizations. Educational Researcher, 0013189X2311610. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231161054
19.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
EsboldtJ. (forthcoming a). Toward equity learning by design: Navigating neoliberal logics in mentor/coach professional development
22.
EsboldtJ. (forthcoming b). The role of mentoring tools in novice teachers’ negotiations and enactments of equity
23.
FaircloughN. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed., [Nachdr.]). Routledge.
24.
FreidusA.TurnerE. (2023). Contested justice: Rethinking educational equity through New York city’s COVID-19 school reopening debates. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 45(3), 437–463. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737221121802
GutiérrezK. D.JurowA. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
31.
HallS. (1986). The problem of ideology-Marxism without guarantees. Sociology Open University, 10(2), 28–44.
32.
HallS. (1997). Introduction. In HallS. (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 1–11). Sage.
33.
HambacherE.GinnK. (2021). Race-visible teacher education: A review of the literature from 2002 to 2018. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120948045
34.
HandsmanE.SieglerB. (2025). Inhabited ideology: Diversity ideology and approaches to racial equity across institutional sectors. Socius, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231241312071
35.
HenrickE. C.CobbP.PenuelW. R.JacksonK.ClarkT. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation.
36.
HochbergE. D.DesimoneL. M. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461521003703052
37.
HorsfordS. D.ScottJ.AndersonG. (2019). The politics of education policy in an era of inequality. Routledge.
38.
IrbyD. J.ClarkS. P. (2018). Talk it (racism) out: Race talk and organizational learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(5), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0015
39.
IshimaruA. M.GallowayM. K. (2021). Hearts and minds first: Institutional logics in pursuit of educational equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 470–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20947459
40.
JacobsJ.RinckJ. (2024). Developing as equity-centered teacher leaders through job-embedded professional learning within a professional development school network. In FeinbergJ.OgletreeS. (Eds.), Advancing school-university partnerships and professional development schools through national research (1st ed., pp. 97–119). Routledge.
41.
James-GallawayC.WilsonA. (2024). “You can’t build a revolution with no education”: Deepening equity-mindedness in professional learning activities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(7), 1907–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2248043
42.
JayakumarU.AdamianA. (2017). The fifth frame of colorblind ideology: Maintaining the comforts of colorblindness in the context of white fragility. Sociological Perspectives, 60(5), 912–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417721910
43.
JohnsonC. C.FargoJ. D. (2010). Urban school reform enabled by transformative professional development: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909352073
44.
KahnJ. (2018). Race on the Brain: What Implicit Bias Gets Wrong about the Struggle for Racial Justice. Columbia University Press.
45.
KavanaghS. S.GotwaltE. S.FarrowJ. (2023). Practice-based coaching for project-based teaching: Understanding relationships between coaching practice and teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104255
46.
KohliR. (2016). Behind school doors: The impact of hostile racial climates on urban teachers of color. Urban Education, 53(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916636653
47.
KohliR.FarringtonR.GarzaS. D. L.FloresB.HerreraS. (2024). What are we inducting teachers of Color into? Disrupting race-evasiveness to create responsive professional development and mentoring policies and practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32, https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.8336
48.
KohliR.PicowerB.MartinezA.OrtizN. (2015). Critical professional development: Centering the social justice needs of teachers. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 6(2), 7–24.
49.
LacV. T.DiamondJ. B.VelazquezM. (2020). “The onus is on us”: How White suburban teachers learn about racial inequities in a critical book study. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(1-2), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1758976
50.
LeonardoZ. (2012). Race frameworks. Teachers College Press.
51.
LeonardoZ. (2020). The Trump presidency, post–color blindness, and the reconstruction of public race speech. In ObasogieO. K. (Ed.), Trumpism and its discontents (pp. 18–37). Berkeley Public Policy Press.
LieraR.DesirS. (2023). Taking equity-mindedness to the next level: The equity-minded organization. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1199174. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1199174
54.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Routledge.
55.
MatiasC. (2016). Feeling White. Sense Publishers.
56.
MatschinerA. (2022). A systematic review of the literature on inservice professional development explicitly addressing race and racism. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 594–630. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221125245
57.
Mayorga-GalloS. (2019). The White-centering logic of diversity ideology. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(13), 1789–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219842619
58.
McCamblyH.Aguilar-SmithS. (2024). Racialized patterns in the distribution of congressional pork: Implications for postsecondary equity and organizational transformation. AERA Open, 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241245973
59.
McCamblyH.ColyvasJ. (2023). Dismantling or disguising racialization?: Defining racialized change work in the context of postsecondary grantmaking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac021
60.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
61.
McManimonS.CaseyZ. (2018). (Re)beginning and becoming: Antiracism and professional development with white practicing teachers. Teaching Education, 29(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1506429
62.
MelamedJ. (2011). Represent and destroy. University of Minnesota Press.
63.
MillerE.TannerS.McCloskeyA.KisselB. (2024). We’ve been had: Neoliberal initiatives in urban education. Urban Education, 59(6), 1935–1963. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221089550
PhilipT.AzevedoF. (2017). Everyday science learning and equity: Mapping the contested terrain. Science Education, 101(4), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21286
69.
PhilipT.BrownA. (2020). We all want more teachers of color, right?: Concerns about the emergent consensus. National Education Policy Center.
70.
PhilipT.KothariV.CastroA. (2024). Rethinking contradictions and inconsistencies in teachers’ sensemaking and actions. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(5), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241268593
71.
PhilipT.Souto-ManningM.AndersonL.HornI.Carter AndrewsD.StillmanJ.VargheseM. (2019). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118798324
72.
PicowerB. (2011). Learning to teach and teaching to learn: Supporting the development of new social justice educators. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(4), 7–24.
73.
PollockM.MatschinerA. (2024). “Well, what’s wrong with the whites?”: A conversation starter on raising expectations for inservice professional development on race with white teachers. Urban Education, 59(6), 1842–1870. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221119109
74.
RajendranA. (2025). Conceptualizing teachers unions as organizations leading for equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 61(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x241291992
ReddingC. (2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319853545
78.
RowanB. (2002). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3), 283–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021277712833
79.
SacramentoJ. (2019). Critical collective consciousness: Ethnic studies teachers and professional development. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(2–3), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1647806
80.
SantibañezL.SnyderC.CentenoD. (2022). Missed opportunity: How induction policy fails to explicitly address English learner-classified students. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211000071
ScottJ.DeBrayE.LubienskiC.La LondeP. G.CastilloE.OwensS. (2017). Urban regimes, intermediary organization networks, and research use: Patterns across three school districts. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264800
83.
ScottJ.JabbarH. (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813515327
84.
SondelB.KretchmarK.Hadley DunnA. (2022). “Who do these people want teaching their children?” White saviorism, colorblind racism, and anti-blackness in “no excuses” charter schools. Urban Education, 57(9), 1621–1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919842618
85.
StanleyD.WeilerJ. (2025). Preparing to lead: Exploring the learning ecosystem of school district equity directors. Studies in the Education of Adults, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2025.2465172
86.
StanulisR. N.WexlerL. J.PylmanS.GuentherA.FarverS.WardA.Croel-PerrienA.WhiteK. (2019). Mentoring as more than “cheerleading”: Looking at educative mentoring practices through mentors’ eyes. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118773996
87.
StewartM. D.GarcíaA.PetersenH. (2021). Schools as racialized organizations in policy and practice. Sociology Compass, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12940
88.
SykesG. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 465–489.
89.
TrinidadJ. E. (2024). An organizational sociology of education: Using structural, network, and ecological perspectives to study schools. Sociological Inquiry, 94(4), 968–993.https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12583
90.
TrujilloT. (2014). The modern cult of efficiency: Intermediary organizations and the new scientific management. Educational Policy, 28(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813513148
91.
TrujilloT.ScottJ.RiveraM. (2017). Follow the yellow brick road: Teach for America and the making of educational leaders. American Journal of Education, 123(3), 353–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/691232
92.
TrujilloT.WoulfinS. (2014). Equity-oriented reform amid standards-based accountability: A qualitative comparative analysis of an intermediary’s instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 253–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214527335
93.
TurnerE. O. (2020). Suddenly diverse: How school districts manage race and inequality. The University of Chicago Press.
94.
TurnerE. O.SpainA. K. (2020). The multiple meanings of (in)equity: Remaking school district tracking policy in an era of budget cuts and accountability. Urban Education, 55(5), 783–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916674060
95.
UllucciK.BatteyD. (2011). Exposing color blindness/grounding color consciousness: Challenges for teacher education. Urban Education, 46(6), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911413150
96.
VillavicencioA.KlevanS.ConlinD.HillK. (2022). “It’s a marathon, not a sprint”: The implementation and outcomes of a yearlong racial justice intervention. AERA Open, 8, 233285842211076. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221107674
97.
VirellaP.LieraR. (2024). Nice for what? The contradictions and tensions of an urban district’s racial equity transformation. Education Sciences, 14(4), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040420
98.
VossoughiS.GutiérrezK. D. (2014). Studying movement, hybridity, and change: Toward a multi-sited sensibility for research on learning across contexts and borders. Teachers College Record, 116(14), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601413
99.
WootenM. E. (Ed.). (2019). Race, organizations, and the organizing process. Emerald Publishing Limited.
WoulfinS.Jones-LawalB.GabrielR. (2018). The terrain of intermediary organizations’ professional development offerings. Professional Development in Education, 44(2), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1299030
102.
ZeichnerK. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376–382.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112445789
103.
ZeichnerK.Peña-SandovalC. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the U.S.: The role of the new schools venture fund. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(5), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700508
