What does it mean to teach in a school that claims commitment to both culturally sustaining pedagogy and high-stakes test achievement? This study explores how ELA teachers perceive and navigate that tension over a school year. Specifically, it examines how teachers describe their instruction before and after the April state exam. Analysis of interviews and artifacts from nine teachers indicated that, after the exam, teachers consciously compensated for a lack of culturally sustaining pedagogy earlier in the year. Teachers described compensating post-test through criticality, plurality, and democracy—attempting a form of culturally sustaining catch-up. They also more frequently mentioned joy.
AnagnostopoulosD. (2003). Testing and student engagement with literature in urban classrooms: A multi-layered perspective. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 177–212. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte20031794
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A. (2011). “EJ” extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201116413
4.
AronsonB. A. (2020). From teacher education to practicing teacher: What does culturally relevant praxis look like?Urban Education, 55(8-9), 1115–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916672288
5.
AronsonB.LaughterJ. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
6.
AuW. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
7.
AuW. (2009). High-stakes testing and discursive control: The triple bind for non-standard student identities. Multicultural Perspectives, 11(2), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960903028727
8.
AuW. (2022). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. Taylor & Francis.
9.
AvalosM. A.PerezX.ThorringtonV. (2020). Comparing secondary English teachers’ ideal and actual writing practices for diverse learners: Constrained professionalism in figured worlds of high-stakes testing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1635056
10.
BlaiseJ. G. (2018). The effects of high-stakes accountability measures on students with limited English proficiency. Urban Education, 53(9), 1154–1181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915613549
11.
BomerR. (2017). What would it mean for English language arts to become more culturally responsive and sustaining?Voices from the Middle, 24(3), 11. https://doi.org/10.58680/vm201728986
12.
ByrdC. M. (2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. Sage Open, 6(3), 2158244016660744. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016660744
13.
CaraballoL. (2017). Students’ critical meta-awareness in a figured world of achievement: Toward a culturally sustaining stance in curriculum, pedagogy, and research. Urban Education, 52(5), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915623344
14.
CharmazK.BelgraveL. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (Vol. 2, pp. 347–365). SAGE.
15.
CoppolaR.WoodardR.VaughanA. (2019). And the students shall lead us: Putting culturally sustaining pedagogy in conversation with universal design for learning in a middle-school spoken word poetry unit. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336919870219
16.
CroccoM. S.CostiganA. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907304964
17.
DegandL.SimonA. C. (2009). On identifying basic discourse units in speech: Theoretical and empirical issues. A Journal of Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics, 4(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.5852
18.
de los ríosC. V.SeltzerK. (2017). Translanguaging, coloniality, and English classrooms: An exploration of two bicoastal urban classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201729200
DychesJ.SamsB. L. (2018). Reconciling competing missions of English education: A story of pedagogical realism. Changing English, 25(4), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2018.1499006
21.
DymokeS. (2012). Opportunities or constraints? Where is the space for culturally responsive poetry teaching within high-stakes testing regimes at 16 + in aotearoa New Zealand and England?English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(4), 19–35.
22.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. the MIT Press.
23.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
24.
GarcíaO. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In Skutnabb-KangasT.PhillipsonR.MohantyA. K.PandaM. (Eds.), Social Justice Through Multilingual Education(pp. 140–158). Orient BlackSwan. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691910-011
25.
GarciaA.O'Donnell-AllenC. (2015). Pose, wobble, flow: A culturally proactive approach to literacy instruction. Teachers College Press.
26.
GardnerR. P.OsorioS. L.CarrilloS.GilmoreR. (2020). (Re) membering in the pedagogical work of Black and Brown teachers: Reclaiming stories as culturally sustaining practice. Urban Education, 55(6), 838–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919892036
27.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
GivenL. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications.
30.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
31.
GlazerJ. (2018). Learning from those who no longer teach: Viewing teacher attrition through a resistance lens. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.011
GorlewskiJ. A.GorlewskiD. A. (2013). De-Grading literacy: How New York state tests knowledge, culture, and critical thinking. Counterpoints, 451(1), 63–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42982083
34.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
35.
HaddixM.Sealey-RuizY. (2012). Cultivating digital and popular literacies as empowering and emancipatory acts among urban youth. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(3), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00126
36.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
37.
HikidaM.TaylorL. A. (2020). “As the test collapses in”: Teaching and learning amid high-stakes testing in two urban elementary classrooms. Urban Education, 58(6), 1032–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920902263
38.
HillocksG. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. Teachers College Press.
39.
HouchenD. (2013). “Stakes is high” culturally relevant practitioner inquiry with African American students struggling to pass secondary reading exit exams. Urban Education, 48(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912456845
40.
HuttE.SchneiderJ. (2018). A history of achievement testing in the United States or: Explaining the persistence of inadequacy. Teachers College Record, 120(11), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812001102
41.
JezR. J.HauthC. M.RamersL. H. (2022). Transforming educators in the United States and South Africa: An international collaboration to enhance culturally responsive inclusive practices. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 25(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.9782/JISNE-D-20-00009
42.
JohnsonS. L.Jr (2011). Powerful pedagogies: Evaluating effective culturally relevant English instruction for high achieving African American males in advanced placement English. University of California.
43.
JohnsonL. P. (2017). The status that troubled me: Re-examining work with Black boys through a culturally sustaining pedagogical framework. Urban Education, 52(5), 561–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915618717
44.
JohnstonK. C.OmogunL.LeeC. C. (2021). From New York city to the world: Examining critical global literacies in an English language arts classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2021.1880992
45.
JonesS. (2023). Black girls’ reading motivations: Centering their perspectives and experiences to redefine a hegemonic construct. Urban Education, 59(5), 1295–1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231214212
46.
KellyL. L. (2013). Hip-hop literature: The politics, poetics, and power of hip-hop in the English classroom. English Journal, 102(5), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201323587
47.
KirklandD. E. (2004). Rewriting school: Critical pedagogy in the writing classroom. Journal of Teaching Writing, 21(1 & 2), 83–96.
48.
KoretzD. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. University of Chicago Press.
49.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
LeeC. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/748192
52.
LeeT. S.McCartyT. L. (2017). Upholding indigenous education sovereignty through critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy. In ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 61–82). Teachers College Press.
53.
LevineS. (2019). A century of change in high school English assessments. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201930240
54.
LevineS.MooreD. P.BeneE.SmithM. W. (2023). What if it were otherwise? Teachers use exams from the past to imagine possible futures in the teaching of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.488
55.
LittleS.GolledgeM.AgarwallaH.GriffithsB.McCamlieD. (2019). Global teachers as global learners: Intercultural teacher training in international settings. London Review of Education, 17(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.1.04
56.
LoveB. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
57.
LyiscottJ. J. (2014). 3 ways to speak English [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/jamila_lyiscott_3_ways_to_speak_english
58.
MaguireT. M. (2017). Culturally responsive pedagogy in the advanced placement classroom: A case study (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University).
MilnerH. R. (2012a). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934712442539
MirraN.GarciaA.MorrellE. (2015). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. Routledge.
63.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
Moore, D. P. & Penuel, W. R. (2023). Making the most of teacher team time to support equitable assessment. Stanford Graduate School of Education Public Scholarship Collaborative, 1(1), 1–8.
66.
MuhammadG. (2023). Unearthing joy: A guide to culturally and historically responsive curriculum and instruction. Scholastic Inc.
67.
NeumannJ. W. (2016). Examining mandated testing, teachers’ milieu, and teachers’ knowledge and beliefs: Gaining a fuller understanding of the web of influence on teachers’ classroom practices. Teachers College Record, 118(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800209
68.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
69.
ParisD. (2021). Culturally sustaining pedagogies and our futures. In The educational forum (Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 364–376). Routledge.
70.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.982l873k2ht16m77
71.
PenuelW. R. (2021). Reimagining American education: Possible futures for equitable educational assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(4), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211065829
72.
PicowerB.MayorgaE. (2015). What's race got to do with it?: How current school reform policy maintains racial and economic inequality.
73.
PophamW. J. (2001). Teaching to the test?Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16–21.
74.
Polleck, J. N., & Jeffery, J. V. (2017). Common Core standards and their impact on standardized test design: A New York case study. High School Journal, 101(1), 1–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90024223
75.
PuzioK.NewcomerS.PrattK.McNeelyK.JacobsM.HookerS. (2017). Creative failures in culturally sustaining pedagogy. Language Arts, 94(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201728949
76.
RandallJ. (2021). “Color-neutral” is not a thing: Redefining construct definition and representation through a justice-oriented critical antiracist lens. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(4), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12429
77.
RavitchD.KohnA. (2014). More than a score: The new uprising against high-stakes testing. Haymarket Books.
78.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. SIU Press.
79.
RoyalC.Dodo SerikiV. (2018). Overkill: Black lives and the spectacle of the Atlanta cheating scandal. Urban Education, 53(2), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917747099
80.
SeiderS.El-AminA.KellyL. L. (2020). The development of critical consciousness. In JensenL. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of moral development: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 203–221). Oxford University Press.
81.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
82.
SheltonS. A.BrooksT. (2019). “We need to get these scores up”: A narrative examination of the challenges of teaching literature in the age of standardized testing. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 15(2), 1–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1235207
83.
SkerrettA. (2009). Responding to student diversity amidst tested traditions and testing standards. Teaching Education, 20(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210902730489
84.
SleeterC. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47(3), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911431472
85.
SmagorinskyP. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308317815
86.
SmithP. (2013). Accomplishing the goals of multicultural teacher education: How about transdisciplinarity?Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 15(1), 27–40.
87.
SmithM. W.ApplemanD.WilhelmJ. D. (2014). Uncommon core: Where the authors of the standards go wrong about instruction-and how you can get it right. Corwin Press.
88.
SmithP.WarricanS. J.Kumi-YeboahA.CheemaJ.AlleyneM. L. (2020). Disrupting (mis)representation in the literacy achievement of “(under)performing” youth. Journal of Education and Development in the Caribbean, 18(2), 111–165. https://doi.org/10.46425/j518021775
89.
StyslingerM. E.StoweJ.WalkerN.Hyatt HostetlerK. (2019). Becoming teachers for social justice: Raising critical consciousness. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(1-2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1533797
90.
TaylorK. M. (2018). Culturally relevant writing pedagogy: An Investigation of assessments, feedback, and equity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago).
91.
TaylorC. S. (2022). Culturally and Socially Responsible Assessment: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press.
WelshR. O.SwainW. A. (2020). (Re)defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902822
94.
WilkieA.SavranskyM.RosengartenM. (2017). Speculative research: The lure of possible futures. Taylor & Francis.
95.
WilliamsonT. (2017). Avoiding the gaze of the test: High-stakes literacy policy implementation. Texas Education Review, 5(2), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2XD0R69Q
96.
WilliamsonP.ApedoeX.ThomasC. (2016). Context as content in urban teacher education: Learning to teach in and for San Francisco. Urban Education, 51(10), 1170–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915623342
97.
Williamson, P., & Moore, D. P. (2021). Preparing teachers for the schools we have and the schools we need. Academic Leadership in Times of Transformation, 167–190.
98.
WillisA. I.HarrisV. J. (2000). Political acts: Literacy learning and teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.1.6
99.
WoodardR.VaughanA.MachadoE. (2017). Exploring culturally sustaining writing pedagogy in urban classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917719440
100.
ZochM. (2017). “It’s important for them to know who they are”: Teachers’ efforts to sustain students’ cultural competence in an age of high-stakes testing. Urban Education, 52(5), 610–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915618716
