Project-based learning (PBL) holds promise for students in urban high schools by creating personalized, engaging, and relevant experiences that prepare students for post-secondary pathways. This exploratory study focused on understanding the implementation of PBL in an urban STEM high school that includes career pathways where students engage in work that reflects industry practices. Data revealed essential features of successful PBL, including ideas for supporting and implementing PBL in an urban high school that enrolls students from historically under-resourced communities. Findings highlight the value of PBL for supporting urban students as they explore their interests.
AkselaM.HaatainenO. (2019). Project based Learning (PBL) in Practise: Active Teachers’ Views of Its Advantages And Challenges. In Integrated education for the real world: 5th international STEM in education conference post-conference proceedings. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, November 2018
2.
AlmullaM. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 215824402093870. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702.
BeierM. E.KimM. H.SaterbakA.LeautaudV.BishnoiS.GilbertoJ. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21465
5.
BerkL. J.Muret-WagstaffS. L.GoyalR.JoyalJ. A.GordonJ. A.FauxR.OriolN. E. (2014). Inspiring careers in STEM and healthcare fields through medical simulation embedded in high school science education. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(3), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00143.2013
6.
BrownB. A.MangramC.SunK.CrossK.RaabE. (2017). Representing racial identity: Identity, race, the construction of the African American STEM students. Urban Education, 52(2), 170–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916661385
7.
ChenP.HernandezA.DongJ. (2015). Impact of collaborative project based learning on self-efficacy of urban minority students in engineering. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 11, 26–39. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1071407.pdf
8.
CondliffeB., Quint, J., Visher, M., Bangser, M.R., Drohojowska, S., Saco, L., Nelson, E. (2017). Project based learning: A literature review. Working Paper. MDRC. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578933.pdf
9.
DeLisiJ.KookJ. F.LevyA. J.FieldsE.WinfieldL. (2020). An examination of the features of science fairs that support students’ understandings of science and engineering practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21669
10.
GiesigeS. N. (2018). Project based learning as an alternative to the pedagogy of poverty in low-income schools. Learning to Teach Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Through Research and Practice, 6(1), 62–67. https://openjournals.utoledo.edu/index.php/learningtoteach/article/view/229
11.
GolannJ. W. (2021). Scripting the moves: Culture and control in a “no-excuses” charter school. Princeton University Press.
12.
HanS.CapraroR. M.CapraroM. M. (2016). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the US. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045
13.
HellströmD.NilssonF.OlssonA. (2009). Group assessment challenges in project based learning–Perceptions from students in higher engineering courses. Paper presented at 2:a Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges ingenjörsutbildningar, 2009, Lund, Sweden.
14.
HolmesV. L.HwangY. (2016). Exploring the effects of project based learning in secondary mathematics education. The Journal of Educational Research, 109, 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979911
15.
JohnsonC. C.SondergeldT. A. (2020). Outcomes of an integrated STEM high school: Enabling access and achievement for all students. Urban Education, 58(8), 1117–1798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920914368
16.
KazisR. (2016). Issue brief: MDRC research on career pathways. MDRC.
17.
KempleJ. J. (2001). Career academies: Impacts on students’ initial transitions to post-secondary education and employment. MDRC.
18.
KempleJ. J. (2004). Career academies: Impacts on labor market outcomes and educational attainment. MDRC.
19.
KempleJ. J. (2008). Career academies: Long-term impacts on labor market outcomes, educational attainment, and transitions to adulthood. MDRC.
20.
KempleJ. J.SnipesJ. C. (2000). Career academies: Impacts on students’ engagement and performance in high school. MDRC.
21.
KoretzD. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. The University of Chicago Press.
22.
LaForceM.NobleE.BlackwellC. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092
MeansB.WangH.WeiX.LynchS.PetersV.YoungV.AllenC. (2017). Expanding STEM opportunities through inclusive STEM-focused high schools. Science Education, 101(5), 681–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21281
25.
MehtaJ.FineS. (2020). In search of deeper learning: The quest to remake the American high school. Harvard University Press.
26.
NarimanN. (2021). How does an industry-aligned technology-rich problem-based learning (PBL) model influence low-income and native Hawaiian student’s STEM career interest?Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6367
27.
PattonM. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
28.
PolikoffM. S.DesimoneL. M.PorterA. C.GaretM. S.StornaiuoloA.PakK.SmithT. M.SongM.FloresN.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.NicholsT. P. (2022). The enduring struggle of standards-based reform: Lessons from a National Research Center on College and Career-Ready Standards. (EdWorkingPaper Number 22-622). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/00ev-gk28
29.
PolikoffM. S.PetrilliM. J.LovelessT. (2020). A decade on, has common core failed? Assessing the impact of national standards. Education Next, 20(2), 72–81. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247174
30.
ReiderD.DavisN.NarimanN. (2021). Problem-based learning increases STEM interest for high school students and instructors. Proceedings from the The IAFOR International Conference on Education, Hawaii, March 18, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2021.23
31.
SahinA. (2019). The role of interdisciplinary project based learning in integrated STEM education. In STEM Education 2.0: Myths and truths – What has K-12 STEM education research taught us? (pp. 93–103). Brill Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004405400_006
32.
SchaeferM. B.RiveraL. M. (2020). Educational experiences that matter to seniors graduating from an urban early college high school. Urban Education, 55(3), 448–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916654526
33.
SchneiderJ. (2011). Excellence for all: How a new breed of reformers is transforming America’s public schools. Vanderbilt University Press.
34.
ShernoffD. J.SinhaS.BresslerD. M.GinsburgL. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(13), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
35.
SmithP. S. (2020). 2108 NSSME+: Trends in U.S. science education from 2012 to 2018. Horizon Research, Inc.
36.
TrygstadP. J.MalzahnK. A.BanilowerE. R.PlumleyC. L.BruceA. D. (2020). Are all students getting equal access to high-quality science education? Data from the 2108 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
37.
TylerB.BrittonT.IvelandA.NguyenK.HippsJ. (2018). Engaged and learning science: How students benefit from Next Generation Science Standards teaching. WestEd.
38.
VisherM.SternD. (2015). New pathways to career and college: Examples, evidence, and prospects. MDRC.
39.
WilsonK. (2021). Exploring the challenges and enablers of implementing a STEM project based learning programme in a diverse junior secondary context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8
