This study examines the linkages between charter school board composition, proposed school models, and authorization outcomes in two majority Black cities in the initial years post-state takeover. Findings illuminate how approved applications overlapped with the following factors: majority White boards with affiliations to elite reform networks or non-educational professional backgrounds and “No Excuses” models. Using concepts from The Racial Contract (
Mills, 1997), this study evidences how application components work to socio-politically construct a proposed school as legible and show an underexplored mechanism by which power is consolidated during the authorization process in ways that limit local Black political power.
AndersonC. R.DixsonA. D. (2016). Down by the riverside: A CRT perspective on education reform in two river cities. Urban Education, 51(4), 363‐389.
2.
AuW.FerrareJ. J. (2014). Sponsors of policy: A network analysis of wealthy elites, their affiliated philanthropies, and charter school reform in Washington state. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1‐24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600805
3.
BaldridgeB. J. (2014). Relocating the deficit: Reimagining black youth in neoliberal times. American Educational Research Journal, 51(3), 440‐472.
4.
BartlettL.VavrusF. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1(1), 5-7. http://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929
5.
BulkleyK. (2001). Educational performance and charter school authorizers: The accountability bind. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(37). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n37.2001
6.
BulkleyK.LuA.Meza FernandezK.GerryA. (2023). Charter authorizing, applications, and the needs of historically marginalized students: A cross state analysis. Educational Policy, 08959048231153596.
7.
BurasK. L. (2014). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. Routledge.
8.
BurrisV. (2008). The interlock structure of the policy-planning network and the right turn in US state policy. In Politics and public policy (pp. 3-42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
9.
CastilloE. (2020). A neoliberal grammar of schooling? How a progressive charter school moved toward market values. American Journal of Education, 126(4), 519‐547. https://doi.org/10.1086/709513
10.
ChengA.HittC.KisidaB.MillsJ. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11(2), 209‐238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1286210
11.
CollinsJ. (2021). Should school boards be in charge? The effects of exposure to participatory and deliberative school board meetings. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(3), 341‐355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1943239
12.
CremataE.DavisD.DickeyK.LawyerK.NegassiY.RaymondM.WoodworthJ. (2013). National Charter School Study. Center for Research on Educational Outcomes.
13.
DeBrayE.ScottJ.LubienskiC.JabbarH. (2014). Intermediary organizations in charter school policy coalitions: Evidence from new orleans. Educational Policy, 28(2), 175‐206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813514132
14.
DixsonA. (2011). Whose choice? A critical perspective on charter schools. In C. Johnson, C. Russill, C. Lavin, & E. Ishiwata (Eds.), The Neoliberal Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, late capitalism, and the remaking of New Orleans (pp. 130-151). The University of Minnesota Press.
15.
DumasM. J. (2016). My brother as “problem” neoliberal governmentality and interventions for black young men and boys. Educational Policy, 30(1), 94‐113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616487
16.
DumasM. J.DixsonA. D.MayorgaE. (2016). Educational policy and the cultural politics of race introduction to the special issue. Educational Policy, 30(1), 3‐12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616488
17.
FabricantM.FineM. (2015). Charter schools and the corporate makeover of public education: What’s at stake?. Teachers College Press.
18.
FarrellC.WohlstetterP.SmithJ. (2012). Charter management organizations: An emerging approach to scaling up what works. Educational Policy, 26(4), 499‐532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811417587
FischerB. (2020). No spending without representation: school boards and the racial gap in education finance. Available at SSRN 3558239.
21.
FordM. R.IhrkeD. M. (2015). A comparison of public and charter school board governance in three states. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(4), 403‐416. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21133
22.
FordM. R.IhrkeD. M. (2016). Comparing nonprofit charter and traditional public school board member perceptions of the public, conflict, and financial responsibility: Is there a difference and does it matter?Public Management Review, 18(7), 972‐992. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028975
23.
FragaL. R.MeierK. J.EnglandR. E. (1986). Hispanic Americans and educational policy: Limits to equal access. The Journal of Politics, 48(4), 850‐876. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131003
24.
FryerR. G.Jr. (2011). Injecting successful charter school strategies into traditional public schools: A field experiment in Houston(No. w17494). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17494
25.
GlazerJ. L.EganC. (2018). The ties that bind: Building civic capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. The American Journal of Educational Research, 55(5), 928-964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088
GoodmanJ. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher, 42(2), 89‐96. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12470856
30.
GrumbachJ. (2022). Laboratories against democracy: How national parties transformed state politics (Vol. 182). Princeton University Press.
31.
HenryK. L.Jr. (2019). Heretical discourses in post-katrina charter school applications. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2609‐2643. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219853811
32.
HenryK. L. (2021). “The price of disaster”: The charter school authorization process in post-katrina new orleans. Educational Policy, 35(2), 235‐258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820988202
33.
HenryK. L.Jr.DixsonA. D. (2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys” racial realities of the charter school authorization process in Post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 30(1), 218‐240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616485
34.
HernándezL. E. (2022). Code switching and political strategy: The role of racial discourse in the coalition-building efforts of charter management organizations. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), 219‐251.
35.
KantorH.LoweR. (2013). Educationalizing the welfare state and privatizing education: The evolution of social policy since the new deal. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 102‐156). Oxford University Press.
36.
KimJ.FieldT.HargraveE. (2016). The achievement school district: lessons from Tennessee [Organizational Report]. Public Impact and New Schools for New Orleans.
37.
KretchmarK.SondelB.FerrareJ. J. (2014). Mapping the terrain: Teach for America, charter school reform, and corporate sponsorship. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 742‐759.
38.
LamboyL.LuA. (2017). The pursuit of college for all: Ends and means in ‘no excuses’ charter schools. Theory and Research in Education, 15(2), 202‐229.
39.
LayJ. C.BaumanA. (2019). Private governance of public schools: Representation, priorities, and compliance in new orleans charter school boards. Urban Affairs Review, 55(4), 1006‐1034.
40.
LemovD. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college (K-12). John Wiley & Sons.
41.
LeonardoZ. (2015). Contracting race: Writing, racism, and education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 86‐98.
42.
LevinH. M.DaschbachJ.PerryA. (2010). A diverse education provider: New Orleans. In K. E. Buckley, J. R. Henig, & H. Levin (Eds.), Between public and private: Politics, governance, and the new portfolio models for urban school reform (pp. 165-194). Harvard Education Press.
43.
LoganJ. R.Burdick-WillJ. (2016). School segregation, charter schools, and access to quality education. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(3), 323‐343.
44.
Lopez KershenJ.WeinerJ. M.TorresC. (2018). Control as care: How teachers in “no excuses” charter schools position their students and themselves. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(3–4), 265‐283.
45.
MarschallM. (2006). Parent involvement and educational outcomes for latino students. Review of Policy Research, 23(5), 1053‐1076.
46.
MasonM. L.ReckhowS. (2017). Rootless reforms? State takeovers and school governance in Detroit and Memphis. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(1), 64‐75.
47.
MeierK. J.EnglandR. E. (1984). Black representation and educational policy: Are they related?American Political Science Review, 78(2), 392‐403.
48.
MillsC. W. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University Press
49.
MorelD. (2018). Takeover: Race, education, and American democracy. Oxford University Press.
50.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Racial/ethnic enrollment in public schools. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cge
51.
NelsonS. L.BennettH. N. (2016). Are black parents locked out of challenging disproportionately low charter school board representation: Assessing the role of the federal courts in building a house of cards. Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y, 12, 153.
52.
New Schools for New Orleans (2010). Scaling the new orleans charter restart model [U.S. Department of Education Innovation for Education (i3) Grant Application].
53.
PearmanF. A.SwainW. A. (2017). School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 90(3), 213‐235.
54.
ReckhowS.SnyderJ. W. (2014). The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 186‐195.
55.
RenzulliL. A.ParrottH. M.BeattieI. R. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 23‐48.
56.
RooksN. (2017). Cutting school: The segrenomics of American education. The New Press.
57.
RothW. D. (2016). The multiple dimensions of race. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(8), 1310‐1338.
58.
SampsonC. (2019). (Im) possibilities of latinx school board members’ educational leadership toward equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(2), 296‐327.
59.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334‐347.
60.
SchuelerB. E.BleibergJ. F. (2022). Evaluating education governance: Does state takeover of school districts affect student achievement?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 41(1), 162‐192.
61.
ScottJ. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106‐136.
62.
ScottJ. (2016). The politics of market-based education reform. In MathisW. J.TrujilloT. M. (Eds). Lessons from NCLB for the every student succeeds act (pp. 9‐36). Information Age Publishing.
63.
ScottJ.HolmeJ. J. (2016). The political economy of market-based educational policies: Race and reform in urban school districts, 1915 to 2016. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 250‐297.
SondelB.KretchmarK.Hadley DunnA. (2019). “Who do these people want teaching their children?” white saviorism, colorblind racism, and anti-blackness in “no excuses” charter schools. Urban Education, 57(9), 1621-1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919842618
66.
SondelB.KretchmarK.Hadley DunnA. (2022). “Who do these people want teaching their children?” white saviorism, colorblind racism, and anti-blackness in “no excuses” charter schools. Urban Education, 57(9), 1621‐1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919842618
67.
SossJ.FordingR. C.SchramS. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
Todd-BrelandE. (2018). A political education: Black politics and education reform in Chicago since the 1960s. UNC Press Books.
70.
TompkinsC. (2015). There’s no such thing as a bad teacher: Reconfiguring race and talent in post-katrina charter schools. Souls, 17(3-4), 211‐230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2015.1147905
71.
TrujilloT.ScottJ.RiveraM. (2017). Follow the yellow brick road: Teach for America and the making of educational leaders. American Journal of Education, 123(3), 353‐391. https://doi.org/10.1086/691232
72.
WhiteT. (2018). Teachers of color and urban charter schools: Race, school culture, and teacher turnover in the charter sector. Journal of Transformative Leadership and Policy Studies, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.36851/jtlps.v7i1.496
73.
WhitmanD. (2008). Sweating the small stuff: Inner-city schools and the new paternalism. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
