In the face of growing critiques, charter management organizations (CMOs) increasingly contend with criticism as they maintain their presence in districts, particularly with school board members who often serve as gatekeepers for charter authorization. Yet, little is known about how CMOs navigate these politically muddy waters in local settings. The localized political maneuvers of CMOs are the central focus of this case study, which demonstrates how CMOs in one city deployed strategic discourse to buffer anticipated critiques and assuage concerns though questions as to the equitable and democratic character of their actions and rhetoric remain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D.MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248837
2.
BakerB. D.LibbyK.WileyK. (2012). Spending by the major charter management organizations: comparing charter school and local public district financial resources. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/spending-major-charter.
3.
BakerB. D.MironG. (2015). The business of charter schooling: understanding the policies that charter operators use for financial benefit. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/charter-revenue.
4.
BallS. J. (2012). Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge.
5.
BallS. J.ExleyS. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of New labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903486125
6.
BallS. J.JunemannC. (2011). Education policy and philanthropy—The changing landscape of English educational governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(10), 646–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.583773
7.
BifulcoR.RebackR. (2013). Fiscal impacts of charter schools: lessons from New York. Education Finance and Policy, 9(1), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00121
8.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9.
BrunoP.ChristianM. S.HoughH. J.MeyerR. H. (2019). Charter competition and district finances: evidence from California students (p. 22). Policy Analysis of California Education.
10.
BulkleyK. E. (2007). Bringing the private into the public changing the rules of the game and new regime politics in Philadelphia public education. Educational Policy, 21(1), 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904806297192
11.
BurasK. L. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296–331. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.6l42343qqw360j03
12.
BurnsP. (2003). Regime theory, state government, and a takeover of urban education. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00163
13.
CaseyL.Di CarloM.BondB.QuinteroE. (2015). The state of teacher diversity in American education. Albert Shanker Institute.
14.
CastilloE.La LondeP. G.OwensS.ScottJ.DeBrayE.LubienskiC. (2021). E-Advocacy in the information market: How social media platforms distribute evidence on charter schools. Urban Education, 56(4), 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920953885
15.
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (2013). Multiple choice: charter school performance in 16 states. Author.
16.
Charter School Act (1992). Cal. Education Code § 47605–47608.
17.
ChubbJ. E.MoeT. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Brookings Institution Press.
18.
DahlR. A.RaeD. W. (2005). Who governs?: democracy and power in an American city (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
19.
DixsonA. D.BurasK. L.JeffersE. K. (2015). The color of reform: race, education reform, and charter schools in post-katrina New orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557826
20.
DoyleD.FinnC.Jr (1984). American Schools and the future of local control. The Public Interest, 77, 77–95.
21.
FarrellC.WohlstetterP.SmithJ. (2012). Charter management organizations: An emerging approach to scaling up what works. Educational Policy, 26(4), 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811417587
22.
FriedmanM. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.
23.
FurgesonJ.GillB.HaimsonJ.KillewaldA.McCulloughM.Nichols-BarrerI.Verbitsky-SavitzN.TehB.BowenM.DemerittA. (2012). Charter-school management organizations: diverse strategies and diverse student impacts. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED528536.pdf.
GoodmanJ. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price?Educational Researcher, 42(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12470856
26.
HadfieldM.ChapmanC. (2009). Leading school-based networks (1st edition). Routledge.
27.
Haney LópezI. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
28.
HenigJ. R.HulaR. C.OrrM.PedescleauxD. S. (2001). The color of school reform: race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton University Press.
29.
HenryK. L. (2019). Heretical discourses in post-katrina charter school applications. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2609–2643. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219853811
30.
HenryK. L.DixsonA. D. (2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys”: racial realities of the charter school authorization process in post-katrina New orleans. Educational Policy, 30(1), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616485
31.
HernándezL. E. (2016b). Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(0), 103. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2321
32.
HernándezL. E. (2016a). Race and racelessness in CMO marketing: exploring charter management organizations’ racial construction and its implications. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1119566
KingsburyI.MarantoR.KarnsN. (2020). Charter school regulation as a disproportionate barrier to entry. Urban Education, 0042085920923011, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920923011
35.
KretchmarK.SondelB.FerrareJ. J. (2014). Mapping the terrain: teach For America, charter school reform, and corporate sponsorship. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.880812
36.
Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT. T.MoserM.HenigJ. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002145
37.
LakeR.DusseaultB.BowenM.DemerittA.HillB. (2010). Learning from charter school management organizations: strategies for student behavior and teacher coaching. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
38.
LakoffG. (2014). The ALL NEW don’t think of an elephant!: know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
39.
LeonardoZ.HunterM. (2009). Race, class, and imagining the urban. In Race, whiteness, and education (pp. 143–165). Routledge.
40.
MarshL. T. S. (2021). “Raw intelligence does not help you”: exploring teachers’ conceptualizations of success at one “no-excuses” charter school. Urban Education, 56(7), 1106–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920979677
41.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
MossbergerK.StokerG. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36(6), 810–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122185109
46.
O’ConnorC.JoffeH. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406919899220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
47.
OmiM.WinantH. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s (2nd ed.). Routledge.
PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2010). Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 41(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
51.
QuinnR.Tompkins-StangeM.MeyersonD. (2014). Beyond grantmaking: philanthropic foundations as agents of change and institutional entrepreneurs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 950–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013488836
52.
ReckhowS. (2012). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. Oxford University Press.
53.
ReckhowS.HenigJ. R.JacobsenR.LittJ. A. (2016). “Outsiders with deep pockets”: The nationalization of local school board elections. Urban Affairs Review, 53(5), 783–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416663004
54.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044
55.
ScottD. M. (1997). Contempt and pity: social policy and the image of the damaged black psyche, 1880-1996. University of North Carolina Press.
56.
ScottJ. T. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(1), 106–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808328531
57.
ScottJ. T. (2011). Market-driven education reform and the racial politics of advocacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(5), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2011.616445
ScottJ. T.DiMartinoC. (2010). Hybridized, franchised, duplicated, and replicated: charter schools and management organizations. In LubienskiC. A.WeitzelP. C. (Eds.), The charter school experiment: expectations, evidence, and implications (pp. 171–196). Harvard Education Press.
60.
ShippsD. (2003). Pulling together: civic capacity and urban school reform. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 841–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004841
61.
SondelB.KretchmarK.Hadley DunnA. (2019). “Who do these people want teaching their children?” white saviorism, colorblind racism, and anti-blackness in “no excuses” charter schools. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919842618
62.
StahlG. (2017). Ethnography of a neoliberal school: building cultures of success. Routledge.
63.
Stone (2008a). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. In M.OrrV. C.Johnson (Eds.), Power in the city: clarence stone and the politics of inequality (pp. 76–107). University Press of Kansas.
64.
StoneC. N. (1989). Regime politics: governing atlanta, 1946-1988. University Press of Kansas.
65.
StoneC. N. (2008b). Civic capacity and urban education. In OrrM.JohnsonV. C. (Eds.), Power in the city: clarence stone and the politics of inequality (pp. 203–225). University Press of Kansas.
66.
Tompkins-StangeM. E. (2017). Policy patrons: philanthropy, education reform, and the politics of influence. Harvard Education Press.
67.
TrujilloT. M.HernándezL. E.JarrellT.KissellR. (2014). Community schools as urban district reform: analyzing oakland’s policy landscape through oral histories. Urban Education, 49(8), 895–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914557644
68.
van DijkT. A. (1997). Chapter 1: The study of discourse. In van DijkT. A. (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 1–34). Sage Publications.
69.
van DijkT. A. (2002). Discourse and racism. In GoldbergD.SolomosJ. (Eds.), The blackwell companion to racial and ethnic studies (pp. 145–159). Blackwell.
70.
VergerA. (2012). Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of public–private partnerships for education in low-income contexts. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.623242
71.
VergerA.FontdevilaC.ZancajoA. (2016). The privatization of education: A political economy of global education reform. Teachers College Press.
72.
WellsA. S.LopezA.ScottJ.HolmeJ. J. (1999). Charter schools as postmodern paradox: rethinking social stratification in an age of deregulated school choice. Harvard Educational Review, 69(2), 172–205. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.69.2.k34475n478v43022
73.
WellsA. S.SlaytonJ.ScottJ. (2002). Defining democracy in the neoliberal age: charter school reform and educational consumption. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039002337
WhiteT. (2018). Teachers of color and urban charter schools: race, school culture, and teacher turnover in the charter sector. Journal of Transformative Leadership & Policy Studies, 7(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.36851/jtlps.v7i1.496
76.
WohlstetterP.SmithJ.FarrellC.HentschkeG. C.HirmanJ. (2011). How funding shapes the growth of charter management organizations: Is the tail wagging the dog?Journal of Education Finance, 37(2), 150–174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41337591
77.
WohlstetterP.SmithJ.FarrellC. C. (2013). Choices and challenges: charter school performance in perspective. Harvard Education Press.
78.
YinR. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
