Youth participatory action research (YPAR) provides a model for youth leadership in research aimed at tangible improvements to their lives. We employed YPAR with queer and trans young adults in a qualitative study about trans high school youth. In this paper, we highlight the importance of relationships, dialog and reflexivity to ensuring ongoing critical reflection on the ethical nature of what often appear as methodological and operational issues. Our research underscores the tensions, contradictions, and limitations of sharing power that emerge in collaborations across age, race, educational attainment, and lived experience.
Abo-ZenaM. M.PavalowM. (2016). Being in-between: Participatory action research as a tool to partner with and learn about emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 4(1), 19–29.
2.
AkomA. A.CammarotaJ.GinwrightS. (2008). Youthtopias: Towards a new paradigm of critical youth studies. Youth Media Reporter, 2(1–6), 108–129.
3.
AskinsK.PainR. (2011). Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 803–821.
4.
BakerA. C.KroehleK.PatelH.JabobsC. (2018). Queering the question: Using survey marginalia to capture gender fluidity in housing and child welfare. Child Welfare, 96(1), 127–146.
5.
BarberaR. A. (2008). Relationships and the research process: Participatory action research and social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 19(2), 140–159.
BellinoM. J.; The Kakuma Youth Research Group. (2018). Closing information gaps in Kakuma refugee camp: A youth participatory action research study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 62, 492–507.
8.
BertrandM. (2019). “I was very impressed”: Responses of surprise to students of color engaged in youth participatory action research. Urban Education, 54(9), 1370–1997.
9.
BettencourtG. M. (2020). Embracing problems, processes, and contact zones: Using youth participatory action research to challenge adultism. Action Research, 18(2), 153–170.
10.
BowlegL. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenge of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325.
11.
BrauneV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
12.
BrownP.Morello-FroschR.BrodyJ. G.AltmanR. G.RudelR. A.SenierL.PerezC.SimpsonR. (2010). Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study. Environmental Health, 9(1), 39.
13.
CaraballoL.LozenskiB. D.LyiscottJ. J.MorellE. (2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking education research. Review of Research in Education, 41, 311–336.
14.
CochranP. A. L.MarshallC. A.Garcia-DowningC.KendallE.CookD.McCubbinL.GoverR. W. S. (2008). Indigenous ways of knowing: Implications for participatory research and community. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 22–27.
15.
CooperM. J. F.SornalingamS.O’DonnellC. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy: An underused theoretical model for general practice?British Journal of General Practice, 65(636), 376–377.
CramptonA. (2015). Decolonizing social work “best practices” through a philosophy of impermanence. Journal of Indigenous Social Development, 4(1), 1–11.
18.
Delgado BernalD. (2016). Cultural intuition: Then, now, and into the future. Center for Critical Race Studies at UCLA Research Briefs, 1.
19.
Delgado BernalD. (2020). Disrupting epistemological boundaries: Reflections on feminista methodological and pedagogical interventions. Journal of Chicano Studies, 45(1), 155–161.
20.
Douthirt-CohenB.TokunagaT. (2020) ‘Is he allowed to have a crush on you?’ interrupting adultism in fieldwork with youth. Ethnography and Education, 15(2), 207–221.
21.
Fals BordaO. (2006). The North–South convergence a 30-year first-person assessment of PAR Orlando. Action Research, 4(3), 351–358.
FineM.TuckE.Zeller-BerkmanS. (2008). Do you believe in Geneva? Methods and ethics at the global local nexus. In DenzinN.LincolnY.SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (Reprinted ed., pp. 157–180). SAGE.
24.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
25.
GardnerM. (2018). Writing together for academic publication as a youth-adult PAR team: Moving from distance and distaste towards transformative engagement. Educational Action Research, 26(2), 205–219.
Grishow-SchadeL.HillierA.KroehleK. (2019). Policy 252 at the 3-year mark: How are we doing?SexGen Policy Lab, School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
28.
HallS. (1993). Minimal selves. In GrayA. (Ed.), Studying culture: An introduction (pp. 134–138). University of Chicago Press.
29.
Haskie-MendozaS.TinajeroL.CervantesA.RodriguezJ.SerrataJ. V. (2018). Conducting youth participatory action research (ypar) through a healing-informed approach with system-involved Latinas. Journal of Family Violence, 33, 605–612.
30.
HerrK. (2017). Insiders doing PAR with youth in their schools: Negotiating professional boundaries and healing justice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(5), 450–463.
31.
HillierA.KroehleK.EdwardsH.GravesG. (2020). Risk, resilience, resistance and situated agency of trans high school students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 17(4), 384–407.
32.
JonesK.OkumT. (2001). Dismantling racism: A workbook for social change groups. Retrieved August 2, 2020, from https://www.dismantlingracism.org/
KuriloffP.AndrusS.RavitchS. (2011). Messy ethics: Conducting moral participatory action research in the crucible of university–school relations. Mind Brain and Education, 5(2), 49–62.
35.
LacV. T.FineM. (2018). The good, the bad, and the ugly; an autoethnographic journey on doing participatory action research as a graduate student. Urban Education, 53(4), 562–583.
36.
LawJ. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
37.
LeskoN. (2012). Act Your Age! A Cultural Construction of Adolescence. Routledge.
38.
McConnellE. A.JanulisP.PhillipsG.IITruongR.BirkettM. (2018). Multiple minority stress and LGBT community resilience among sexual minority men. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(1), 1–12.
39.
MalterudK.BjorkmanM. (2016). The invisible work of closeting: A qualitative study about strategies used by lesbian and gay people to conceal their sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(10), 1339–1354.
40.
MirraN.GarciaA.MorrellE. (2016). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. Routledge.
41.
MiskovicM.HoopK. (2006). Action research meets critical pedagogy theory, practice, and reflection. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 269–291.
42.
MooreJ. (2004). Living in the basement of the ivory tower: A graduate student’s perspective of participatory action research within academic institutions. Educational Action Research, 12(1), 145–162.
43.
MorrellE. (2006). Critical participatory action research and the literacy achievement of ethnic minority groups. In HoffmanJ. V.SchallertD. L.FairbanksC. M.WorthyJ.MalodaB. (Eds.), 55th yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 1–18), Oak Creek, WI.
44.
OzerE. J.NewlanS.DouglasL.HubbardE. (2013). ‘‘Bounded’’ empowerment: Analyzing tensions in the practice of youth-led participatory research in urban public schools. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 13–26.
45.
PatelL. (2012). Contact zones, problem posing and critical consciousness. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 333–346.
46.
PenningtonJ. L.PraterK. (2016) The veil of professionalism: An autoethnographic critique of white positional identities in the figured worlds of white research performance. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(5), 901–926.
47.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis or cure? Rethinking uses of reflexivityu as methodological power in qualitative resarch. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.
48.
PlattM. L. (1991). Profession, 33–40.
49.
PritchardI. A. (2002). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3–13.
50.
RittenbuschA. (2012). Bridging guidelines and practice: Toward a grounded care ethics in youth participatory action research. The Professional Geographer, 64(1), 16–24.
51.
RodriguezL. F.BrownT. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with young adults. New Directions for Young Adults Development, 123, 19–34.
52.
RolloT. (2018). Feral children: Settler colonialism, progress, and the figure of the child. Settler Colonial Studies, 8(1), 60–79.
53.
RoulstonK.SheltonS. A. (2015). Reconceptualizing bias in teaching qualitative research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 332–342.
54.
SabatiS. (2019). Upholding “colonial unknowing” through the IRB: Reframing institutional research ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9–10), 1056–1064.
55.
SandwickT.FineM.GreeneA. C.StoudtB. G.TorreM. E.PatelL. (2018). Promise and provocation: Humble reflections on critical participatory action research for social policy. Urban Education, 53(4), 473–502.
56.
San PedroT.KinlochV. (2017). Toward projects in humanization: Research on co-creating and sustaining dialogic relationships. American Education Research Journal, 54(1S), 373s–394s.
57.
SheltonJ. (2015). Transgender youth homelessness: Understanding programmatic barriers through the lens of cisgenderism. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 10–18.
58.
SinghA.RichmondK.BurnesT. (2013). Feminist participatory action research with transgender communities: Fostering the practice of ethical and empowering research designs. International Journal of Transgenderism, 14, 93–104.
59.
SmithJ. A.McculloughR.CritchlowC.LukeM. (2017). Proposing an initiative research methodology for LGBTQ+ youth: Photo-elicitation and thematic analysis. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 11(4), 271–284.
Sosa-ProvencioM. A. (2019). A Revolucionista ethic of care: Four mexicana educators’ subterraneous social justice revolution of fighting and feeding American. Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1113–1147.
62.
StoudtB. G. (2007). The co-construction of knowledge in “safe spaces”: Reflecting on politics and power in participatory action research. Children Youth and Environments, 17(2), 280–297.
63.
TorreM. E.FineM. (2008). Participatory action research in the contact zone. In CammarotaJ.FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Young adults participatory action research in motion (p. 23). Routledge.
64.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–427.
65.
UttJ.TochluckS. (2020). White teacher, know thyself: Improving anti-racist praxis through racial identity development. Urban Education, 55(1), 125–152.
66.
VincentB. W. (2018). Studying trans: Recommendations for ethical recruitment and collaboration with transgender participants in academic research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(2), 102–116.
67.
WagamanM. A.SanchezI. (2017). Looking through the magnifying glass: A duoethnographic approach to understanding the value and process of participatory action research with LGBTQ youth. Qualitative Social Work, 16(1), 78–95.
68.
WagamanM. A. (2015). Changing ourselves, changing the world: Assessing the value of participatory action research as an empowerment-based research and service approach with LGBTQ young people. Child & Youth Services, 36(2), 124–149.
69.
WalshC. A.HewsonJ.ShierM. (2008). Unraveling ethics: Reflections from a community-based participatory research education project with youth. The Qualitative Report, 13(3), 379–393.
70.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J.KosciwJ. G. (2014). The relation between suicidal ideation and bullying victimization in a national sample of transgender and non-transgender adolescents. In GoldblumP.EspelageD.ChuJ.BognarB. (Eds.), Youth suicide and bullying: Challenges and strategies for prevention and intervention (p. 134). Oxford University Press.
71.
YeeJ. Y. (2016). A paradox of social change: How the quest for liberation reproduces dominance in higher education and the field of social work. Social Work Education, 35(5), 495–505.
