Continued Disparate Discipline: Theorizing State Takeover Districts’ Impact on the Continued Oppression of Black Girls

Abstract

The state takeover of schools in predominantly Black communities has not disrupted the racial subjugation of Black girls. Using proportional analyses and Detroit, Memphis, and New Orleans as research sites, we find that the takeover of school districts does not produce statistically weaker associations with the use of harsh disciplinary practices against Black girls. This finding is important in the context of education reform, as researchers begin to question the motives and outcomes of education reforms. Moreover, this study is important to literature that considers the civil rights that Black communities must forego for the promise of better schools. Finally, this finding is relevant to extant conversations in urban education, especially as those conversations consider the school-to-prison pipeline and disparate disciplinary outcomes for Black girls.

Keywords

expulsion education law education policy critical race theory high school suspension achievement gap social incarceration racism urban Black females discipline policies school reform urban education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annamma

S. A.

Anyon

Joseph

N. M.

Farrar

Greer

Downing

Simmons

(2016). Black girls and school discipline: The complexities of being overrepresented and understudied. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085916646610

Archer-Banks

D. A.

Behar-Horenstein

L. S.

(2012). Ogbu revisited: Unpacking high-achieving African American girls’ high school experiences. Urban Education, 47, 198-223. doi:10.1177/0042085911427739

Arsen

Mason

M. L.

(2013). Seeking accountability through state appointed emergency district management. Educational Policy, 27, 248-278. doi:10.1177/0895904813475711

Augustine

J. C.

Freeman

C. M.

(2011). Grading the graders and reforming the reform: An analysis of the state of public education ten years after No Child Left Behind. Loyola Law Review, 57, 237-272.

Barnes

R. D.

(1990). Race consciousness: The thematic content of racial distinctiveness in critical race scholarship. Harvard Law Review, 103, 1864-1871.

Bell

D. A.

Jr. (1976). Serving two masters: Integration ideals and client interests in school desegregation litigation. Yale Law Journal, 85, 470-516.

Bell

D. A.

Jr. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 97, 518-533.

Bell

D. A.

(1993). The racism is permanent thesis: Courageous revelation or unconscious denial of racial genocide. Capital University Law Review, 22, 571-588.

Bonilla-Silva

(2017). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

10.

Black

S. M.

(2016). An examination of urban school governance reform in Detroit public schools, 1999-2014 (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1429/

11.

Blake

J. J.

Butler

B. R.

Lewis

C. W.

Darensbourg

(2011). Unmasking the inequitable discipline experiences of urban Black girls: Implications for urban educational stakeholders. The Urban Review, 43, 90-106. doi:10.1007/s11256-009-0148-8

12.

Brown

A. F.

(2011). Descendants of “Ruth”: Black girls coping through the “Black Male Crisis.” The Urban Review, 43, 597-619. doi:10.1007/s11256-010-0162-x

13.

Brown v. Board of Education I, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

14.

Cibulka

J. G.

(2003). Educational bankruptcy, takeovers, and reconstitution of failing schools. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 102, 249-270.

15.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.

16.

Crenshaw

Ocen

Nanda

(2015). Black girls matter: Pushed out, overpoliced, and underprotected. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53f20d90e4b0b80451158d8c/t/54d21c9ee4b0535ab80a10ed/1423056030631/BlackGirlsMatter_ExecutiveSummary.pdf

17.

Delgado

(1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411-2441.

18.

Delgado

Stefancic

(2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.

19.

Dixson

A. D.

Buras

K. L.

Jeffers

(2015). The color of reform: Race, education reform, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 288-299. doi:10.1177/1077800414557826

20.

Donnor

J. K.

Shockley

K. G.

(2010). Leaving us behind: A political economic interpretation of NCLB and the miseducation of African American males. Educational Foundations, 24(3-4), 43-54.

21.

Dumas

M. J.

(2013). “Waiting for Superman” to save Black people: Racial representation and the official antiracism of neoliberal school reform. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 531-547. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.822621

22.

Dumas

M. J.

(2014). “Losing an arm”: Schooling as a site of Black suffering. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 17, 1-29. doi:10.1080/13613324.2013.850412

23.

Dumas

M. J.

(2016). Against the dark: Antiblackness in education policy and discourse. Theory into Practice, 55, 11-19. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1116852

24.

Duncan

G. A.

(2005). Critical race ethnography in education: Narrative, inequality and the problem of epistemology. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 93-114.

25.

Epperson

(2014). Brown’s dream deferred: Lessons on democracy and identity from Cooper v. Aaron to the “school-to-prison pipeline.” Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 687-702.

26.

Ferri

B. A.

Connor

D. J.

(2005a). In the shadow of Brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 93-100. doi:10.1177/07419325050260020401

27.

Ferri

B. A.

Connor

D. J.

(2005b). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107, 452-474.

28.

Freeman

A. D.

(1978). Legitimizing racial discrimination through antidiscrimination law: A critical review of Supreme Court doctrine. Minnesota Law Review, 62, 1049-1119.

29.

Garcia

De Lissovoy

(2013). Doing school time: The hidden curriculum goes to prison. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(4), 49-69.

30.

Garda

R. A.

Jr. (2005). The new IDEA: Shifting educational paradigms to achieve racial equality in special education. Alabama Law Review, 56, 1071-1134.

31.

Garda

R. A.

Jr. Doty

D. S.

(2013). The legal impact of emerging governance models on public education and its office holders. The Urban Lawyer, 45, 21-50.

32.

Giroux

H. A.

Saltman

(2009). Obama’s betrayal of public education? Arne Duncan and the corporate model of schooling. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 9, 772-779. doi:10.1177/1532708609348575

33.

Gottlieb

(2009). Harmonizing No Child Left Behind’s restructuring provision and state charter school laws: The need for autonomy, flexibility, and adequate resources. Seton Hall Law Review, 39, 191-224.

34.

Gregory

Bell

Pollock

(2014). How educators can eradicate disparities in school discipline: A briefing paper on school-based interventions. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~atlantic/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Disparity_Interventions_Full_031214.pdf

35.

Hamilton

M. P.

Helig

J. V.

Pazey

B. L.

(2014). A nostrum of school reform? Turning around reconstituted urban Texas high schools. Urban Education, 49, 182-215. doi:10.1177/0042085913475636

36.

Hamlin

(2017). Parental involvement in high choice deindustrialized cities: A comparison of charter and public schools in Detroit. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085917697201

37.

Harris

C. I.

(1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707-1791.

38.

Helig

J. V.

(2013). Reframing the refrain: Choice as a civil rights issue. Texas Education Review, 1, 83-94.

39.

Helig

J. V.

Williams

McSpadden McNeil

Lee

(2011). Is choice the panacea? An analysis of Black secondary student attrition from KIPP, other private charters and urban districts. Berkeley Review of Education, 2, 153-178.

40.

Henry

K. L.

Jr. Dixson

A. D.

(2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys”: Racial realities of the charter school authorization process in post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 30, 218-240. doi:10.1177/0895904815616485

41.

Herman

J. L.

(2003). State test lessons: The effects on school reform. Values in Urban Education, 46-53.

42.

Hewitt

D. T.

(2011). Reauthorize, revise and remember: Refocusing the No Child Left Behind Act to fulfill Brown’s promise. Yale Law & Policy Review, 30, 169-194.

43.

Holley-Walker

D. R.

(2008). Educating at the crossroads: Parents involved, No Child Left Behind and school choice. Ohio State Law Journal, 69, 911-938.

44.

Hursh

(2007). Exacerbating inequality: The failed promise of the No Child Left Behind Act. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 10, 295-308. doi:10.3102/0002831207306764

45.

James

O. R.

(2014). Opt-out education: School choice as racial subordination. Iowa Law Review, 99, 1083-1135.

46.

Klaf

Kwan

(2010). The neoliberal straitjacket and public education in the United States: Understanding contemporary education reform and its urban implications. Urban Geography, 31, 194-210. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.31.2.194

47.

Ladson-Billings

Tate

W. F.

IV . (1995). Towards a Critical Race Theory of education. Teachers College Record, 91, 47-68.

48.

MacIver

M. A.

MacIver

(2006). Which bets paid off? Findings on the impact of private management and K-8 conversion reforms on the achievement of Philadelphia students. Review of Research, 23, 1077-1093. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00250.x

49.

Martin

D. B.

(2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111, 295-338.

50.

Mathis

W. J.

(2009). NCLB’s ultimate restructuring alternatives: Do they improve the quality of education? Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/nclb-ultimate-restructuring

51.

McCluskey

A. T.

(1989). Mary McLeod Bethune and the education of Black girls. Sex Roles, 21, 113-126. doi:10.1007/BF00289731

52.

McNeil

(2012, October 15). States punch reset button with NCLB waivers: Many revise subgroup goals. Education Week. Retrieved from https://edsource.org/wp-content/uploads/old/EdWeek-NCLB-Waivers1.pdf

53.

Milner

H. R.

IV. (2010). Start where you are, but don’t stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

54.

Milner

H. R.

IV. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43, 693-718. doi:10.1177/0021934712442539

55.

Morris

E. W.

(2007). “Ladies” or “loudies”? Perceptions and experiences of black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38, 490-515. doi:10.1177/0044118X06296778

56.

Morris

M. W.

(2012). Race, gender, and the “school to prison pipeline”: Expanding our discussion to include Black girls. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/monique_morris/2/

57.

Morris

M. W.

(2016). Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. New York, NY: The New Press.

58.

Nance

J. P.

(2014). School surveillance and the Fourth Amendment. Wisconsin Law Review, 79-137.

59.

Nelson

S. L.

(2016a). Different script, same caste in the use of passive and active racism: A Critical Race Theory analysis of the (ab)use of “house rules” in race-related education cases. Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 21, 297-356.

60.

Nelson

S. L.

(2016b). Killing two achievements with one stone: The intersectional impact of Shelby County on the rights to vote and access high performing schools. Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal, 13, 225-272.

61.

Nelson

S. L.

(2017a). Racial subjugation by another name? Using the links in the school-to-prison pipeline to reassess state takeover district performance. Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives, 9(1), 1-33.

62.

Nelson

S. L.

(2017b). Special education reform policies and the permanence of oppression: A critical race case study of special education reform in Shelby County, Tennessee. Howard Law Journal, 60, 201-224.

63.

Nelson

S. L.

Bennett

H. N.

(2016). Are Black parents locked out of challenging disproportionately low charter school board representation? Assessing the role of the federal courts in building a house of cards. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 12, 153-203.

64.

Nelson

S. L.

Grace

J. E.

(2016). The right to remain silent in New Orleans: The role of non-politically accountable school boards in the school-to-prison pipeline. Nova Law Review, 40, 447-492.

65.

Nyachae

T. M.

(2016). Complicated contradictions amid Black feminism and millennial Black women teachers creating curriculum for Black girls. Gender and Education, 28, 786-806. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1221896

66.

Oluwole

J. O.

Green

P. C.

III. (2009). State takeovers of school districts: Race and the equal protection clause. Indiana Law Review, 42, 343-409.

67.

Pazey

B. L.

DeMatthews

(2016). Student voice from a turnaround urban high school: An account of students with and without dis/abilities leading resistance against accountability reform. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085916666930

68.

Price

H. E.

(2010). Does No Child Left Behind really capture school quality? Evidence from an urban school district. Educational Policy, 24, 779-814.

69.

Ricks

S. A.

(2014). Falling through the cracks: Black girls and education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4, 10-21.

70.

Rollock

(2007). Why Black girls don’t matter: Exploring how race and gender shape academic success in an inner city school. Support for Learning, 22, 197-202. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9604.2007.00471.x

71.

Sawyer

(2013). I ain’t do nothing: The social and academic experiences of Black males in a dismantled school (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University). Retrieved from http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=etd

72.

Skiba

R. J.

Eckes

S. E.

Brown

(2009). African-American disproportionality in school discipline: The divide between best evidence and legal remedy. New York Law School Law Review, 54, 1071-1112.

73.

Tonnesen

S. C.

(2013). “Hit it and quit it”: Responses to Black girls’ victimization in school. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 28(1), Article 1.

74.

Tuzzolo

Hewitt

D. T.

(2006). Rebuilding inequity: The re-emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90, 59-68.

75.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (2014, July 14). Resolution agreement on racial segregation in Buffalo public schools. Retrieved from http://buffalony.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=4&ID=1837

76.

Useem

Christman

J. B.

Boyd

W. L.

(2006). The role of district leadership in radical reform: Philadelphia’s experience under the state takeover, 2001-2006. An occasional paper. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED493704

77.

Wallace

J. M.

Jr. Goodkind

Wallace

C. M.

Bachman

J. G.

(2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among US high school students: 1991-2005. The Negro Educational Review, 59(1-2), 47-62.

78.

Welch

Payne

A. A.

(2010). Racial threat and punitive school discipline. Social Problems, 57, 25-48. doi:10.1525/sp.2010.57.1.25

79.

Wong

Shen

F. X.

(2003). Measuring the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 89-119. doi:10.1207/S15327930PJE7804_06

80.

Woodson

A. N.

(2017). “There ain’t no White people here”: Master narratives of the civil rights movement in the stories of urban youth. Urban Education, 52, 316-342.

81.

Wun

(2016a). Against captivity: Black girls and school discipline policies in the afterlife of slavery. Educational Policy, 30, 171-196. doi:10.1177/0895904815615439

82.

Wun

(2016b). Unaccounted foundations: Black girls, anti-black racism, and punishment in schools. Critical Sociology, 42, 737-750. doi:10.1177/0896920514560444

83.

Zimmer

Kho

Henry

Viano

(2015). Evaluation of the effects of Tennessee’s achievement school district on student test scores. Retrieved from http://www.tnconsortium.org/data/files/gallery/ContentGallery/ASD_Impact_Policy_Brief_Final_12.8.15.pdf