The study tests the proposition that pedagogical orientations foster domain-specific teacher dispositions. Nineteen preservice teachers in an urban teacher certification program emphasizing culturally relevant teaching (CRT) were interviewed at the completion of all coursework and teaching experiences in diverse, urban classrooms. Dispositional statements (n = 405) were used in a comparative analysis that included cross-tabs chi-square statistics and contingency tables. The study found that teaching dispositions associated with two CRT domains, academic success and cultural competence, were prevalent, whereas dispositions associated with the critical consciousness domain were minimal. Interrelatedness was found for teacher dispositions associated with respect for diversity, authenticity, and generalizability.
AllenA.HancockS. D.Starker-GlassT.LewisC. W. (2017). Mapping culturally relevant pedagogy into teacher education programs: A critical framework. Teachers College Record, 119(1), 1-20.
2.
AmateaE. S.CholewaB.MixonK. A. (2012). Influencing preservice teachers’ attitudes about working with low-income and/or ethnic minority families. Urban Education, 47, 801-834.
3.
AragonA.CulpepperS. A.McKeeM. W.PerkinsM. (2014). Understanding profiles of preservice teachers with different levels of commitment to teaching in urban schools. Urban Education, 49, 543-573.
4.
BoggessL. (2010). New urban teachers for character and activism. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 65-95.
5.
BuehlM.FivesH. (2009). Exploring teachers’ beliefs about teaching knowledge: Where does it come from? Does it change?The Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 367-407.
6.
CarrM.ClaxtonG. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 9, 9-37.
CastroA. (2010). Themes in the research on preservice teachers’ view of cultural diversity: Implications for researching millennial preservice teachers. Educational Researcher, 39, 198-210.
9.
ChubbuckS. M.ZembylasM. (2008). The emotional ambivalence of socially just teaching: A case study of a novice urban schoolteacher. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 274-318.
10.
ClaxtonG.CarrM. (2004). A framework for teaching learning: The dynamics of disposition. Early Years: Journal of International Research and Development, 24, 87-97.
11.
CombsA. W. (1999). Being and becoming: A field approach to psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). (2015). Standards for accreditation of educator preparation. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/standards/introduction
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
CroftS. J.PogueT. D.Siddle WalkerV. (Eds.). (2018). Living the legacy of African American education: A model for university and school engagement. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
DamonW. (2007). Dispositions and teacher assessment: The need for a more rigorous definition. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 365-369.
16.
DeeJ. R.HenkinA. B. (2002). Assessing dispositions toward cultural diversity among preservice teachers. Urban Education, 37, 22-40.
DiezM. E.MurrellP. C. (2010). Dispositions in teacher education—Starting points for consideration. In MurrellP. C.DiezM. E.Feiman-NemserD.SchusslerD. L. (Eds.), Teaching as moral practice: Defining, developing, and assessing professional dispositions in teacher education (pp. 7-26). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
19.
DottinE. S. (2009). Professional judgment and dispositions in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 83-88.
20.
DurdenT.TruscottD. (2013). Critical reflectivity and the development of the new culturally relevant teachers. Multicultural Perspectives, 15, 73-80.
21.
EllisI. E.LeeJ. M.WileyL. P. (2009). Educator dispositions: A survey of U.S. teacher education programs. Southeastern Teacher Education Journal, 2, 77-86.
22.
FreeburgB.WorkmanJ. (2010). Media frames regarding teacher dress: Implications for career and technical education teacher preparation. Career & Technical Education Research, 35, 29-45. doi:10.5328/cter35.103
23.
GarmonM. A. (2005). Six key factors for changing preservice teachers’ attitudes/beliefs about diversity. Educational Studies, 38, 275-286.
24.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
GayG. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching principles, practices, and effects. In MilnerH. R.IVLomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of Urban Education, (pp. 353-372). NY: Routledge.
27.
GayG. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
HabermanM. (1995). Selecting “star” teachers for children and youth in urban poverty. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 777-781.
29.
HabermanM.PostL. (1998). Teachers for multicultural schools: The power of selection. Theory into Practice, 37, 96-104.
30.
HollinsR. E.KolisM. W.McIntyreS. R.StephensJ. T.BattalioR. L. (2010). Putting dispositions in the driver’s seat. In MurrellP. C.DiezM. E.Feiman-NemserD.SchusslerD. L. (Eds.), Teaching as moral practice: Defining, developing, and assessing professional dispositions in teacher education (pp. 117-140). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
31.
HowardT. C.Rodriguez-MinkoffA. C. (2017). Culturally relevant pedagogy 20 years later: Progress or pontificating? What have we learned, and where do we go?Teachers College Record, 119(1), 1-32.
JohnsonS. M.KardosS. M. (2008). The next generation of teachers: Who enters, who stays and why. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD.DemersK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions and challenging contexts (3rd ed., pp. 445-467). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
JohnsonS. M.KardosS. M.KauffmanD.LiuE.DonaldsonM. L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers’ early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61), 1-25. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/216
35.
KatzL. (2002). “Not all dispositions are desirable”: Implications for assessment. Assessment in Education, 9, 53-54.
36.
KatzL. G. (1993). Dispositions: Definitions and implications for early childhood practices. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
37.
KiddJ. K.SánchezS. Y.ThorpE. K. (2008). Defining moments: Developing culturally responsive dispositions and teaching practices in early childhood preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 316-329.
38.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34, 159-165.
LazurA. (2013). Degrees toward social justice teaching: Examining the dispositions of three urban early-career teachers. Urban Review, 45, 701-727.
43.
LeeY. A.Hemer-PatnodeL. (2010). Developing teacher candidates’ knowledge, skills, and dispositions to teach diverse students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37, 222-235.
44.
McCartyT. L.LeeT. S. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 101-124.
45.
MilesM.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
46.
MilnerH. R.IV. (2017). Where’s the race in culturally relevant pedagogy?Teachers College Record, 119(1), 1-26.
47.
MilnerH. R.IVLomoteyK. (2014). Introduction. In Richard MilnerH.LomoteyK.IV (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. xv-xxiii). New York, NY: Routledge.
MurrellP. C.DiezM. E.Feiman-NemserD.SchusslerD. L. (2010). Teaching as moral practice: Defining, developing, and assessing professional dispositions in teacher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
50.
MurrellP. C.Jr. (2001). The community teacher: A new framework for effective urban teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author. Available from http://ncate.org
53.
NorrisD. (2008). Teachers’ dispositions: Supporting democracy or forcing indoctrination. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 3(3). Available from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067186.pdf
54.
NotarC. E.RileyG. W.TaylorP. W. (2009). Dispositions: Ability and assessment. International Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-14.
55.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 85-100.
56.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
57.
PattersonJ. H.CollinsL.AbbottG. (2004). A study of teacher resilience in urban schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 3-9.
58.
RitchhartR.PerkinsD. (2000). Life in the mindful classroom: Nurturing the disposition of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 27-47.
59.
RobertsM. A. (2010). Toward a theory of culturally relevant critical teacher care: African American teachers’ definitions and perceptions of care for African American students. The Journal of Moral Education, 39, 449-467.
60.
SadlerD. R. (2002). Learning dispositions: Can we really assess them?Assessment in Education, 9, 45-51.
61.
SchulteL.EdickN.EdwardsS.MackielD. (2004). The development and validation of teacher disposition index. University of Nebraska at Omaha. Retrieved from http://www.usca.edu/essays/vol122004/schulte.pdf
62.
SchulteL.EdwardsS.EdickN. (2008). The development and validation of the diversity dispositions index. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 5, 11-19. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/tedfacpub/17
63.
SchusslerD. (2006). Defining dispositions: Wading through murky waters. The Teacher Educator, 41, 251-268.
64.
SchusslerD. L.StooksberryL. M.BercawL. A. (2010). Understanding teacher candidate dispositions: Reflecting to build self-awareness. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 350-363.
65.
SilvermanS. K. (2010). What is diversity? An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 292-329.
66.
SplitterL. J. (2010). Dispositions in education: Nonentities worth talking about. Educational Theory, 60, 203-230.
67.
StenhouseV. L. (April, 2014). Teacher educators and the institutions in which we work: (How) are we modeling multicultural teacher education?Research presented at American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
68.
StricklandM.WeinsteinE.ThomasJ.PierceJ.StuckeyA. (April, 2003). Of teacher dispositions, the ALCP and portfolios. Research presented at American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
69.
SwartzE. (2003). Teaching white preservice teachers: Pedagogy for change. Urban Education, 38, 255-278.
70.
Talbert-JohnsonC. (2006). Preparing highly qualified teacher candidates for urban schools: The importance of dispositions. Education and Urban Society, 39, 147-160.
71.
TarcP. (2007). Teaching (for) dispositions? Old debates, new orthodoxies: Hanging onto a “knowledge approach.”Journal of Educational Controversy, 2(2). Retrieved from https://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol2/iss2/9
72.
ThompsonJ.WindschitlM.BraatenM. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 574-615.
TruscottD.SchaferN.Rainer-DangelJ. (2013, October). An examination of first year teachers’ shared knowledge in an online professional learning community. Research presented at Georgia Educational Research Association, Savannah, GA.
75.
TruscottD.StenhouseV. (2013, April). A comparative analysis of teacher dispositions: Finding a shared vision. Research presented at American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
76.
UsherD. (November, 2002). Arthur Combs’ five dimensions of helper belief reformulated as five dispositions of teacher effectiveness. Presented at the first annual symposium on Educator Dispositions, Richmond, KY.
77.
UsherD. (November, 2004). Dispositions-centered programs for teacher education. Paper presented at the third annual symposium on Educator Dispositions, Richmond, KY.
78.
UsherD.UsherM.UsherL. (November, 2003). Nurturing five dispositions of effective teachers. Presented at the second national symposium on Educator Dispositions, Richmond, KY.
79.
VillegasA. M. (2007). Dispositions in teacher education: A look at social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 370-380.
80.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
YoungE. (2010). Challenging to conceptualizing and actualizing culturally relevant pedagogy: How viable is the theory in classroom practice?Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 248-260.
