This study evaluated five teachers from a middle school with a history of low-performances and high teacher turnover. This school participated in a reform program, Pay-For-Performance, where they received financial bonuses to increase performances on literacy and mathematics assessments. Additional requirements included participation in workshops, and planning and data discussions. Despite appreciation for incentives, teachers credited these professional development opportunities and district’s growth model as the impetus for their changing practices. Participants’ instructional practices became student-centered as they promoted engagement by building stronger relationships with students and by offering them choices with how they demonstrated their understanding of the curriculum.
AllingtonR. L. (2009). Literacy policies that are needed: Thinking beyond No Child Left Behind. In GoodmanY.HoffmanJ. (Eds.), Changing literacies for changing times: An historical perspective on the future of reading research, public policy, and classroom practices (pp. 266-281). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AuW. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258-267.
3.
AuW. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43, 25-45.
4.
BakerE.BaronP.Darling-HammondL.HaertelE.LaddH.LinnR.. . . ShepardL. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (EPI Briefing Paper #278). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED516803
5.
BirmanB. F.DesimoneL.PorterA. C.GaretM. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
6.
BoeijeH. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391-409.
7.
Brion-MeiselsG. (2015). “Can I trust you with this?” Investigating middle school students’ use of learning supports. Urban Education, 50, 718-749.
8.
CholewaB.AmateaE.West-OlatunjiC. A.WrightA. (2012). Examining the relational processes of a highly successful teacher of African-American children. Urban Education, 47, 250-279.
9.
ComerJ. P. (2010). The Yale Child Study Center school development program. In MeeceJ.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 419-433). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CubanL. (2009). Hugging the middle: How teachers teach in an era of testing and accountability. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
12.
DelpitL. (2012). Multiplication is for White people: Raising expectations for other people’s children. New York, NY: The New Press.
13.
EcclesJ.WangM. (2012). Commentary: So, what is student engagement anyway? In ChristensonS. L.Reschly WellingtonA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133-148). New York, NY: Springer.
14.
Fisher-AriT. R.KavanaghK. M.MartinA. (2016). Urban teachers struggling within and against neoliberal, accountability-era policies. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 13(2), 1-18.
15.
GibsonS. E.BrooksC. (2012). Teachers’ perspectives on the effectiveness of a locally planned professional development program for implementing new curriculum. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(1), 1-23. doi:10.1080/13664530.2012.667953
16.
GrahamS.WeinerB. (2004). Theories and principles of motivation. In BerlinerD. C.CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
GuskeyT. R. (2009). Closing the knowledge gap on effective professional development. Education Horizons, 87, 224-233.
18.
HenemanH. G.MilanowskiA. T. (1999). Teachers’ attitudes about teacher bonuses under school-based performance award programs. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 327-341.
19.
HickeyD. T. (2011). Participation by design: Improving individual motivation by looking beyond it. In McInerneyD. M.WalkerR. A.LiemG. A. D. (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 137-162). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
20.
HickeyD. T.GranadeJ. B. (2004). The influence of sociocultural theory on our theories of engagement and motivation. In McInerneyD. M.VanEttenS. (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 223-248). Greenwich, CT: Information Age .
21.
HoffmanJ. V.DuffyG. G. (2016). Does thoughtfully adaptive teaching actually exist? A challenge to teacher educators. Theory into Practice, 55, 172-179.
22.
HunzickerJ. (2011). Effective professional development for teachers: A checklist. Professional Development in Education, 37, 177-179.
23.
IngvarsonL.BeavisA.KleinhenzE. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1-26.
KelleyC.ProtsikJ. (1997). Risk and reward: Perspectives on the implementation of Kentucky’s school-based performance award program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 474-505.
26.
LaveJ.WengerE. (2011). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MarshJ. A.SpringerM. G.McCaffreyD. F.YuanK.EpsteinS.KoppichJ.. . . PengX. (2011). A big apple for educators: New York City’s experiment with school wide performance bonuses. Arlington, VA: RAND Corporation.
28.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
McCombsB. (2010). Learner-centered practices: Providing the context for positive learner development, motivation and achievement. In MeeceJ.EcclesJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development (pp. 60-74). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
McHughR. M.HornerC. G.ColditzJ. B.WallaceT. L. (2013). Bridges and barriers: Adolescent perceptions of student-teacher relationships. Urban Education, 48, 9-43.
31.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
MillerS. D. (1995). Teachers’ responses to test-driven accountability pressures: “If I change, will my scores drop?”, Reading Research and Instruction, 34, 332-351.
33.
MillerS. D.DuffyG. G. (2006). Are we crazy to keep doing this?Reading Today, 24(3), 18.
34.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
35.
MilnerH. R. (2014). Scripted and narrowed curriculum reform in urban schools. Urban Education, 48, 743-749.
36.
MiscoT. (2008). Was that a result of my teaching? A brief exploration of value-added assessment. The Clearing House, 82(1), 11-14.
37.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 112-130.
38.
NgJ. C.PeterL. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Examining the career choices of alternatively licensed teachers in urban schools. Urban Review, 42, 123-142.
39.
NolanS. B.WardC. J.HornI. S. (2011). Motivation, engagement, and identity: Opening a conversation. In McInerneyD. M.WalkerR. A.LiemG. A. D. (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 109-136). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
40.
PatrickH.RyanA. M. (2005). Identifying adaptive classrooms: Dimensions of the classroom social environment. In MooreK. A.LippmanL. H. (Eds.), What children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 271-278). New York, NY: Springer.
41.
RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
SpringerM.BalchR. (2009). Design components of incentive pay programs in the education sector. In SclafaniS. (Ed.), Evaluating and rewarding the quality of teachers: International practices (pp. 65-101). Mexico: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
44.
ToughP. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
50.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
WellsG. (2012). Inquiry as an orientation for learning, teaching, and teacher education. In WellsG.ClaxtonG. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 197-210). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
52.
WellsG.ClaxtonG. (2002). Introduction: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In WellsG.ClaxtonG. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 1-18). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
53.
WertschJ. V. (1993). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
WilliamD.LeeC.HarrisonC.BlackP. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 11, 49-65.
55.
WoltersC. A.PintrichP. R.KarabenickS. A. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In MooreK. A.LippmanL. H. (Eds.), What children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251-270). New York, NY: Springer.
56.
ZochM. (2013). Crafting theoretically defensible literacy teaching practices while supporting students with test preparation. Literacy Research Association Yearbook, 62, 53-67.
57.
ZochM. (2017). “It’s important for them to know who they are”: Teachers’ efforts to sustain students’ cultural competence in an age of high-stakes testing. Urban Education, 52, 610-636.
