There are racial/ethnic disparities associated with school punishment practices and academic progress. In addition, research suggests that urban schools have stricter school punishment practices and higher grade retention rates. What remains unknown, however, is the relationship between race/ethnicity, school punishment practices, and retention rates across urban, rural, and suburban schools. Thus, this study draws from the Texas Education Agency’s Public Education Information Management System and Critical Race Theory to investigate if there is link between school punishment practices and academic progress, as well as establishing if there are racial/ethnic disparities in urban, rural, and suburban contexts.
American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities. (2012). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understanding and reducing disparities. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.aspx
2.
AndrewM. (2014). The scarring effects of primary-grade retention? A study of cumulative advantage in the educational career. Social Forces, 93, 653-685.
3.
ArumR. (2003). Judging school discipline: The crisis of moral authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BegerR. R. (2003). The “worst of both worlds”: School security and disappearing fourth amendment rights of students. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 336-354.
5.
BellD. A. (1992). Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
BlauJ. (2003). Race in schools: Perpetuating White dominance?. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
7.
BoothE. A.MarchbanksM. P.IIICarmichaelD.FabeloT. (2012). Comparing campus discipline rates: A multivariate approach for identifying schools with significantly different than expected exclusionary discipline rates. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 3, 6.
8.
BradleyC. L.RenzulliL. A. (2011). The complexity of non-completion: Being pushed or pulled to drop out of high school. Social Forces, 90, 521-545.
9.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
10.
CarterP.SkibaR.ArredondoM.PollockM. (2017). You can’t fix what you don’t look at: Acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. Urban Education, 52, 207-235.
11.
CasellaR. (2003). Punishing dangerousness through preventive detention: Illustrating the institutional link between school and prison. In WaldJ.LosenD. J. (Eds.), New directions for youth development: Deconstructing the school-to-prison pipeline (pp. 55-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
ChapmanT. K. (2013). You can’t erase race! Using CRT to explain the presence of race and racism in majority white suburban schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 611-627.
13.
ChenQ.HughesJ. N.KwokO. M. (2014). Differential growth trajectories for achievement among children retained in first grade: A growth mixture model. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 327-353.
14.
Children’s Defense Fund. (1975). School suspensions: Are they helping children?Cambridge, MA: Washington Research Project.
15.
CostenbaderV. K.MarksonS. (1994). School suspension: A survey of current policies and practices. NASSP Bulletin, 78, 103-107.
16.
CrenshawK. W.GotandaN.PellarG.ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York, NY: The New Press.
17.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory. An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
18.
DiemS.ClearyC.AliN.FrankenbergE. (2014). The politics of maintaining diversity policies in demographically changing urban-suburban school districts. American Journal of Education, 120, 351-389.
19.
FabeloT.ThompsonM. D.PlotkinM.CarmichaelD.MarchbanksM. P.IIIBoothE. A. (2011). Breaking school rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center.
20.
FenningP.RoseJ. (2007). Overrepresentation of African American students in exclusionary discipline. Urban Education, 42, 536-559.
21.
FergusonA. A. (2001). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
FrankenbergE. (2009). Splintering school districts: Understanding the link between segregation and fragmentation. Law & Social Inquiry, 34, 869-909.
23.
FrankenbergE.LeeC. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
24.
GirouxH. A. (2003). Racial injustice and disposable youth in the age of zero tolerance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 553-565.
25.
GreenbergJ. H. (1956). The measurement of linguistic diversity. Language, 32, 109–115.
26.
GregoryA.SkibaR.NogueraP. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39, 59-68.
27.
HallinanM. T. (1991). School differences in tracking structures and track assignments. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 1, 251-275.
28.
Haney-LópezI. (1997). White by law: The legal construction of race. New York: New York University Press.
29.
HardinJ. W.HilbeJ. M. (2011). Generalized linear models and extensions (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
30.
HowardT. C. (2008). Who really cares? The disenfranchisement of African American males in preK-12 schools: A critical race theory perspective. Teachers College Record, 110, 954-985.
31.
ImM. H.HughesJ. N.KwokO. M.PuckettS.CerdaC. A. (2013). Effect of retention in elementary grades on transition to middle school. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 349-365.
32.
JacobB. A.LefgrenL. (2009). The effect of grade retention on high school completion. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 33-58.
33.
JimersonS. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420-437.
34.
JimersonS. R.FergusonP. (2007). A longitudinal study of grade retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes of retained students through adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 314-339.
35.
KerckhoffA. C. (1993). Diverging pathways. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KimC.LosenD.HewittD. (2012). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: New York University Press.
37.
KozolJ. (2006). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
38.
KozolJ. (2012). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools (Reprint ed.). New York, NY: Broadway Books.
39.
KupchikA. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in an age of fear. New York: New York University Press.
40.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2004). New directions in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In BanksJ. A.BanksC. A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 50-65). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory in education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47-68.
42.
LareauA. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
LeeV. E.BurkamD. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 353-393.
44.
LewisA. E. (2003). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
45.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
LipsitzG. (2011). How racism takes place. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
MarchbanksM. P.BlakeJ. J.BoothE. A.CarmichaelD.SeibertA.FabeloT.ThompsonM. D. (2014). The economic effects of exclusionary discipline on grade retention and high school dropout. In LosenD. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Research to practice (pp. 59-74). New York, NY: Teachers Press.
49.
MartinA. (2011). Holding back and holding behind: Grade retention and students’ non-academic and academic outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 739-763.
50.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
MasseyD. S.SánchezM. R. (2010). Brokered boundaries. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
53.
McNeelyC. A.NonnemakerJ. M.BlumR. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of School Health, 72, 138-146.
54.
MollerS.StearnsE.BlauJ. R.LandK. C. (2006). Smooth and rough roads to academic achievement: Retention and race/class disparities in high school. Social Science Research, 35, 157-180.
55.
MooreW. L. (2008). Reproducing racism: White space, elite law schools and racial inequality. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
56.
MorrisE. W. (2006). An unexpected minority: White kids in an urban school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
57.
MorrisE. W. (2012). Learning the hard way: Masculinity, place, and the gender gap in education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press Series in Childhood Studies.
58.
MuschertG. W.HenryS.BracyN. L.PegueroA. A. (2013). Responses to school violence: Confronting the Columbine effect. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
59.
MuschertG. W.PegueroA. A. (2010). The Columbine effect and school anti-violence policy. Research in Social Problems & Public Policy, 17, 117-148.
60.
NelsonS. L. (2017). Racial subjugation by another name: Using the links in the school-to-prison pipeline to reassess state takeover district performance. Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives, 9, 1-13.
61.
NelsonS. L.GraceJ. E. (2016). The right to remain silent in New Orleans: The role of nonpolitically accountable charter school boards in the school-to-prison pipeline. NOVA Law Review, 40, 447-460.
62.
NogueraP. A. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory Into Practice, 42, 341-350.
63.
NogueraP. A. (2008). The trouble with Black boys: And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
NolanK. (2011). Police in the hallways: Discipline in an urban high school. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
65.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66.
OrfieldG.KucseraJ.Siegel-HawleyG. (2012). E Pluribus . . . separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Los Angeles: The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles.
67.
PegueroA. A.ShekarkharZ. (2011). Latino/a student misbehavior and school punishment. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 54-70.
68.
PellerinL. A. (2005). Applying Baumrind’s parenting typology to high schools: Toward a middle range theory of authoritative socialization. Social Science Research, 34, 283-10. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.02.003
69.
PerryB. L.MorrisE. W. (2014). Suspending progress collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79, 1067-1087.
70.
PetersonL. S.HughesJ. N. (2011). The differences between retained and promoted children in educational services received. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 156-165.
71.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
72.
PortillosE. L.GonzálezJ. C.PegueroA. A. (2012). Crime control strategies in school: Chicanos/as perceptions and criminalization. The Urban Review, 44, 171-188.
73.
PowellJ. A. (1999). Race and space. Poverty and Race, 8, 3-4.
74.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.
75.
RiosV. M. (2017). Human targets: Schools, police, and the criminalization of Latino youth. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
76.
RodneyL. W.CrafterB.RodneyH. E.MupierR. M. (1999). Variables contributing to grade retention among African American adolescent males. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 185-190.
77.
RoscignoV. J.Tomaskovic-DeveyD.CrowleyM. (2006). Education and the inequalities of place. Social Forces, 84, 2121-2145.
78.
RumbergerR. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
SheddC. (2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
80.
SilberglittB.JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.AppletonJ. J. (2006). Does the timing of grade retention make a difference? Examining the effects of early versus later retention. School Psychology Review, 35, 134-141.
81.
SimsonD. (2014). Exclusion, punishment, racism, and our schools: A critical race theory perspective on school discipline. UCLA Law Review, 61, 506-563.
82.
SkibaR. J. (2004). Zero tolerance: The assumptions and the facts. Education Policy Briefs, 2(1), 1-8.
83.
SkibaR. J. (2013). Reaching a critical juncture for our kids: The need to reassess school-justice practices. Family Court Review, 51, 380-387.
84.
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC. G.RauschM. K. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85-107.
85.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In EvertsonC. M.WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook for classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063-1089). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
86.
SolorzanoD. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 121-136.
87.
SolorzanoD. G.YossoT. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counterstorytelling as an analytical framework for educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23-44.
88.
TeferaA.FrankenbergE.Siegel-HawleyG.ChirichignoG. (March, 2011). Integrating suburban schools: How to benefit from growing diversity and avoid segregation. The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://eprints.cdlib.org/uc/item/4390s4mf
89.
TonryM. (1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
90.
TonryM. (2010). Punishing race: A continuing American dilemma. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
91.
TysonK. (2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, Black students, and acting White after Brown. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
92.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Current population survey. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
93.
VasquezH. J.WilliamsA.McNeilL. M.LeeC. (2011). Is choice a panacea? An analysis of Black secondary student attrition from KIPP, other private charters and urban districts. Berkeley Review of Education, 2, 153-178.
94.
WelchK.PayneA. A. (2010). Racial threat and punitive school discipline. Social Problems, 57, 25-48.
95.
WilsonW. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
96.
WilsonW. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
97.
WilsonW. J. (2009). More than just race: Being black and poor in the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
98.
Zubrinsky-CharlesC. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167-207.
