This article presents the results of a mixed-methods study that examined how state policy requiring the use of high-stakes teacher performance assessments (TPAs) affected candidates enrolled in urban teacher preparation programs in the Midwest. The data reveal that despite institutional pass rates above the national average, the edTPA process negatively affected candidates’ sense of self-efficacy, agency, and readiness to engage in culturally and contextually responsive teaching. The article concludes with an analysis of how TPA policies socialize preservice teachers to prioritize compliance over agency, with troubling implications for urban teachers, students, and school communities.
AnS. (2015). Preparing elementary school teachers for social studies instruction in the context of edTPA. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41, 25-35.
Cochran-SmithM.PiazzaP.PowerC. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6-27.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
CronenbergS.HarrisonD.KorsonS.JonesA.Murray-EverettN. C.ParrishM.Johnston-ParstonM. (2016). Trouble with the edTPA: Lessons learned from a narrative self-study. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 8, 109-134.
11.
DotsonE.DoverA. G.HenningN.Agarwal-RangnathR. (2018). They should see themselves as powerful: Teacher educators, agency, and resisting TPAs. In AhlquistR.MontañoT.GorskiP. (Eds.), Assault on kids and teachers: Countering privatization, deficit ideologies, and standardization in U.S. schools (2nd ed.) (pp. 219-235). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
12.
DoverA. G.SchultzB. D. (2016). Troubling the edTPA: Illusions of objectivity and rigor. The Educational Forum, 80, 95-106.
13.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
GreenblattD. (2015). TPA: Taking power away. Education in a Democracy, 7, 103-134.
15.
GreenblattD.O’ HaraK. E. (2015). Buyer beware: Lessons learned from edTPA implementation in New York State. Thought & Action, 31, 57-68.
16.
HammernessK.WilliamsonP.KosnickC. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on urban teacher residencies: The trouble with “generic” teacher education. Urban Education, 51, 1155-1169.
17.
HébertC. (2017). What do we really know about the edTPA? Research, PACT, and packaging a local teacher performance assessment for national use. The Educational Forum, 81, 68-82.
18.
HollinsE. (2012). Learning to teach in urban schools: The transition from preparation to practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
HowardT. C.MilnerH. R.IV. (2014). Teacher preparation for urban schools. In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 199-216). New York, NY: Routledge.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.
22.
KuranishiA.OylerC. (2017). I failed the edTPA. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40, 299-313.
23.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465-491.
24.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 7-24.
25.
LaskyS. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 899-916.
26.
LedwellK.OylerC. (2016). Unstandardized responses to a “standardized” test: The edTPA as gatekeeper and curriculum change agent. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 120-134.
27.
LynnM. (2014, March19). Making culturally relevant pedagogy relevant to aspiring teachers. Diverse Issues in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://diverseeducation.com/article/61280/
MeuwissenK. W.ChoppinJ. M. (2015). Preservice teachers’ adaptations to tensions associated with the edTPA during its early implementation in New York and Washington states. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(103), 1-26.
30.
MirraN.RogersJ. (2016). The overwhelming need: How the unequal political economy shapes urban teachers’ working conditions. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085916668952
31.
ReaganE. M.SchramT.McCurdyK.ChangT.EvansC. (2016). Politics of policy: Assessing the PACT and edTPA. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(9), 3-23.
32.
SatoM. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA?. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 421-434.
33.
SleeterC. E. (2017). Critical race theory and the whiteness of teacher education. Urban Education, 52, 155-169.
34.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity. (2013). edTPA field test: Summary report. Stanford, CA: Author.
35.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity. (2015a). edTPA secondary English language arts assessment handbook: September 2015. Stanford, CA: Author.
TuckE.GorlewskiJ. (2016). Racist ordering, settler colonialism, and edTPA: A participatory policy analysis. Educational Policy, 30, 197-217.
39.
Vazquez HeligJ.KhalifaM.TillmanL. C. (2014). High-stakes reforms and urban education. In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 523-538). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41.
WilliamsonP.ApedoeX.ThomasC. (2016). Context as content in urban teacher education. Urban Education, 51, 1170-1197.
