Using a cross-case analysis of online, on-campus and online university teacher preparation courses, this study critically examines the constraints and affordances of online teacher education in preparing teachers for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) urban schools. The results of the study indicate that while there was no significant difference between online and on-campus courses in terms of teacher acquisition of knowledge related to CLD instruction and assessment, questions remain about whether online teacher preparation can promote critical self-reflection, culturally responsive teaching practices, and collaboration within schools, when teacher learning is not supported and situated in schools and communities in an ongoing and structured way.
AkintundeO. (2006). Diversity.com: Teaching an online course on White racism and multiculturalism. Multicultural Perspectives, 8(2), 35-45.
2.
AllenI. E.SeamanJ. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BarabS. (2003). An introduction to the special issue: Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. The Information Society: An International Journal, 19, 197-201.
5.
BennettS. V. (2013). Effective facets of a field experience that contributed to eight preservice teachers’ developing understandings about culturally responsive teaching. Urban Education, 48, 380-419.
ChazanD.Ben-ChaimD.GormasJ. (1998). Shared teaching assignments in the service of mathematics reform: Situated professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 687-702.
8.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164-195.
10.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DrayB. J.LowenthalP. R.MiszkiewiczM. J.Ruiz-PrimoM. A.MarczynskiK. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education, 32, 29-47.
14.
DubetzN. E.De JongE. J. (2011). Teacher advocacy in bilingual programs. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 34(3), 248-262.
15.
EchevarriaJ.GravesA. (2011). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching ELLs with diverse abilities (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
16.
EscamillaK. (2006). Semilingualism applied to the literacy behaviors of Spanish-speaking emerging bilinguals: Bi-illiteracy or emerging biliteracy?Teachers College Record, 108, 2329-2353.
17.
FránquizM.SalazarM. (2004). The transformative potential of humanizing pedagogy: Addressing the diverse needs of Chicano/Mexicano students. The High School Journal, 87(4), 36-53.
18.
FreireP. (2005). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
19.
GándaraP.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
GarcíaE. (1990). Educating teachers for language minority students. In HoustonW. R.HabermanM.SikulaJ. (Eds.), Handbook for research on teacher education (pp. 717-729). New York, NY: Macmillan.
21.
GarcíaE.AriasM. B.HarrisN. J.MurriH.SernaC. (2010). Developing responsive teachers: A challenge for a demographic reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 132-142.
22.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
23.
GayG.KirklandK. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42, 181-187.
24.
GottliebM.CranleyM. E.OliverA. (2007). English language proficiency standards and resource guide (2007edition). PreKindergarten through Grade12. Madison: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System on behalf of the WIDA Consortium.
25.
GottliebM.NguyenD. (2007). Assessment and accountability in language education programs: A guide for administrators and teachers. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
26.
HartshorneR.HeafnerT.PettyT. (Eds.). (2012). Teacher education programs and online learning tools: Innovations in teacher preparation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
27.
HeritageM.WalquiA.LinquantiR. (2015). English language learners and the new standards: Developing language, content knowledge, and analytical practices in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
28.
HermanT.BanisterS. (2007). Face-to-face versus online coursework: A comparison of costs and learning outcomes. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7, 318-326. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol7/iss4/currentpractice/article1.cfm
29.
HollinsE. R.GuzmanM. T. (2005). Research on preparing teachers for diverse populations. In Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education ( pp. 477-548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
HonigsfeldA.DoveM. G. (2010). Collaboration and co-teaching: Strategies for English learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
31.
HopewellS.EscamillaK. (2013). Struggling reader or emerging biliterate student? Reevaluating the criteria for labeling emerging bilingual students as low achieving. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 68-89.
32.
HornbergerN. H. (2005). Opening and filling up implementational and ideological spaces in heritage language education. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 605-609.
KitsantasA.TalleyrandR. M. (2005). The use of online resources to promote multicultural competencies among K-12 preservice teachers: A model for self-regulatory learning. Education, 125, 627-637.
35.
KracauerS. (1952). The challenge of qualitative content analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 16, 631-642.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34, 159-165.
LiconaM. M. (2011). Online multicultural education: Asynchronous discussions in online multicultural education. Multicultural Education, 19(1), 2-8.
39.
LohfinkG.MoralesA.ShroyerG.YahnkeS. (2012). Growing effective CLD teachers for today’s classrooms of CLD children. Action in Teacher Education, 34(1), 41-54.
40.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators ( pp. 55-72). New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 52, 98-109.
42.
LucasT.VillegasA. M.Freedson-GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 361-373.
43.
Márquez-LópezT. (2005). California’s standards movement: How English learners have been left out of the equation for success. In PedrazaP.RiveraM. (Eds.), Latino education: An agenda for community action research (pp. 205-230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Martin-BeltránM.HickeyP. (2012). English language learners, teacher preparation for diversity. In BanksJ. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (Vol. 2., pp. 790-795). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
45.
MeansB.ToyamaY.MurphyR.BakiaM.JonesK. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
46.
MelnickS. L.ZeichnerK. M. (1998). Teacher education’s responsibility to address diversity issues: Enhancing institutional capacity. Theory Into Practice, 37(2), 88-95.
47.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
MilnerH. R. (2006). Preservice teachers’ learning about cultural and racial diversity: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 41, 343-375.
49.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
50.
MilnerH. R.LomotoyK. (2014). Introduction. In MilnerH. R.LomotoyK. (Eds.), Handbook of Urban Education ( pp. xv-xxiv). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
MollL. (2010). Mobilizing culture, language, and educational practices: Fulfilling the promises of Mendez and Brown. Educational Researcher, 37, 6451-6460.
NietoS. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
NietoS.BodeP. (2011). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
55.
RuizR. (1988). Orientations in language planning. In McKayS.WongS. (Eds.), Language diversity: Problem or resource? (pp. 3-25). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
56.
SeidlB. (2007). Working with communities to explore and personalize culturally relevant pedagogies: “Push, double images, and raced talk.”Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 168-183.
57.
SleeterC. E. (2008). Preparing white teachers for diverse students. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 94-106). New York, NY: Routledge.
58.
Souto-ManningM. (2011). Playing with power and privilege: Theatre games in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 997-1007.
59.
SpezziniS.AustinJ. S. (2011). New teachers for new students. Childhood Education, 87, 318-322.
60.
SpradleyJ. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
61.
Staehr FennerD. (2014). Advocating for English Learners: A guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
62.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
TsuiA. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
UllicciK.BatteyD. (2011). Exposing color blindness/grounding color consciousness: Challenges for teacher education. Urban Education, 46, 1195-1225.
66.
ValdésG.MenkenK.CastroM. (2015). Common core bilingual and English language learners: A resource for educators. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
67.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
68.
VygotskyL. V. (1972). The psychology of art (Introduction by LeontievA. N.) (Scripta Technica Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
WalquiA.van LierL. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
70.
WhitfordB. L.WoodD. R. (2010). Teachers learning in community: Realities and possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
71.
Wong-FillmoreL.SnowC. (2005). What teachers need to know about language. In AdgerC. T.SnowC. E.ChristianD. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7-54). Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
72.
Working Group on ELL Policy. (2010). Improving educational outcomes for English language learners: Recommendations for the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (updated May 25, 2010). Retrieved from http://ellpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/ESEAFinal.pdf
73.
WysockB.Jr. (2006). Once collegial, research schools now mean business: Arizona State strips professor of empire as funding ebbs; lawsuit claims retaliation. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB114670909113943444
74.
ZhaoY.LeiJ.YanB.LaiC.TanS. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836-1834.
75.
ZittounT. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
