Spurring parental involvement has been a core objective of charter school reform. This study compares for-profit-managed and nonprofit-managed charter schools and their public school peers in Detroit on two indicators of parental involvement. Nonprofit-managed charter schools generated higher rates of general parental involvement, net of demographic, school, and self-selection controls. Public schools, however, elicited greater parent participation in school decision making, using the same controls. Although differences in school strategies may be underlying these results, self-selection mechanisms also appear to be salient, underscoring variation in school choice participation among demographically similar families in high choice deindustrialized cities.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates. Urban Education, 42, 250-283.
2.
BallengerJ. (2009). Parental involvement: Low socio-economic status (SES) and ethnic minority parents’ struggle for recognition and identity. In JenlinkP.TownesF. H. (Eds.), The struggle for identity in today’s schools: Cultural recognition in a time of increasing diversity (pp. 156-168). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
Baquedano-LópezP.AlexanderR. A.HernándezS. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools what teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149-182.
4.
BauchP. A.GoldringE. B. (1995). Parent involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 1-21.
5.
BeckerH. J.NakagawaK.CorwinR. G. (1997). Parent involvement contracts in California’s charter schools: Strategy for educational improvement or method of exclusion?Teachers College Record, 98, 511-536.
6.
BerlinerD. C.BiddleB. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Redding, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
BhargavaS.WitherspoonD. P. (2015). Parental involvement across middle and high school: Exploring contributions of individual and neighborhood characteristics. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1702-1719.
8.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2006). Institutional change and coproduction of public services: The effect of charter schools on parental involvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 553-576.
9.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina’s charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31-56.
10.
BrownH.HenigJ.Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT. T. (2004). Scale of operations and locus of control in market- versus mission-oriented charter schools. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1035-1051.
11.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2005). Are charter school students harder to educate? Evidence from Washington, DC. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 365-380.
13.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2009). Charter schools: Hope or hype?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
BurasK. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81, 296-331.
15.
Burdick-WillJ.KeelsM.SchubleT. (2013). Closing and opening schools: The association between neighborhood characteristics and the location of new educational opportunities in a large urban district. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35, 59-80.
16.
ChristianakisM. (2011). Parents as “help labor”: Inner-city teachers’ narratives of parent involvement. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38, 157-178.
17.
Council of Great City Schools. (2008). Reforming and improving the Detroit Public Schools. Report prepared Detroit Public Schools. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505340
18.
CrosbyS. A.RasinskiT.PadakN.YildirimK. (2015). A 3-year study of a school-based parental involvement program in early literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 165-172.
19.
DarlingS.WestbergL. (2004). Parent involvement in children’s acquisition of reading. The Reading Teacher, 57, 774-776.
20.
Data Driven Detroit. (2014). Student daily commute distance for Detroit schools. Available from datadrivendetroit.org
21.
DaviesS.AuriniJ. (2011). Exploring school choice in Canada: Who chooses what and why?Canadian Public Policy, 37, 459-477.
22.
DaviesS. (2004). School choice by default? Understanding the demand for private tutoring in Canada. American Journal of Education, 110, 233-255.
23.
DaviesS.QuirkeL. (2007). The impact of sector on school organizations: Institutional and market logics. Sociology of Education, 80, 66-89.
24.
DearingE.KreiderH.SimpkinsS.WeissH. B. (2006). Family involvement in school and low-income children’s literacy performance: Longitudinal associations between and within families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 653-664.
25.
Detroit Public Schools. (2013). Detroit Public Schools: Neighborhood centered, quality schools 2013 – 2017 strategic plan. Available from http://detroitk12.org
26.
DrakeD. D. (2000). Responsive school programs: Possibilities for urban schools. American Secondary Education, 28, 9-15.
27.
DworkinA. G. (2005). The No Child Left Behind Act: Accountability, high-stakes testing, and roles for sociologists. Sociology of Education, 78, 170-174.
28.
EckesS. E.FoxR. A.BuchananN. K. (2011). Legal and policy issues regarding niche charter schools: Race, religion, culture, and the law. Journal of School Choice, 5, 85-110.
29.
EpsteinJ. L. (2010). School, family and community partnerships. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
ErtasN.RochC. H. (2014). Charter schools, equity, and student enrollments: The role of for-profit educational management organizations. Education and Urban Society, 46, 548-579.
31.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, P.L. 114-95, § 1010 (2015).
FanX.ChenM. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta- analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.
34.
FlemingD. J.CowenJ. M.WitteJ. F.WolfP. J. (2015). Similar students, different choices: Who uses a school voucher in an otherwise similar population of students?Education and Urban Society, 47, 785-812.
35.
FullerB. (2009). Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
GarciaD. R. (2008). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools: Do parents sort students into specialized charter schools?Education and Urban Society, 40, 590-612.
37.
GoldringE. B.PhillipsK. J. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public–private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 209-230.
38.
GulosinoC. A.LubienskiC. (2011). Schools’ strategic responses to competition in segregated urban areas: Patterns in school locations in Metropolitan Detroit. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19, Article 13.
HandsC. (2013). Including all families in education: School district-level efforts to promote parent engagement in Ontario, Canada. Teaching Education, 24, 134-149.
41.
HendersonA. T.MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
42.
HenigJ. R.HolyokeT. T.BrownH.Lacireno-PaquetN. (2005). The influence of founder type on charter school structures and operations. American Journal of Education, 111, 487-588.
43.
HessF. (2001). Whaddya mean you want to close my school? The politics of regulatory accountability in charter schooling. Education and Urban Society, 33, 141-156.
44.
HillN. E.CastellinoD. R.LansfordJ. E.NowlinN.DodgeK. A.BatesJ. E.PettitG. (2004). Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1491-1509.
45.
HoffD. J. (2006). Law’s ‘persistently dangerous’ tag weighed. Education Week, 26(10), 24.
46.
Hoover-DempseyK. V.WalkerJ. M.JonesK. P.ReedR. P. (2002). Teachers involving parents (TIP): Results of an in-service teacher education program for enhancing parental involvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 843-867.
47.
HornbyG.LafaeleR. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational Review, 63, 37-52.
48.
JabbarH. (2015). “Every kid is money” market-like competition and school leader strategies in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 638-659.
JeynesW. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237-269.
51.
JeynesW. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement a meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82-110.
52.
JeynesW. H. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47, 706-742.
53.
KraftM. A.DoughertyS. M. (2013). The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 199-222.
54.
Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT. T.MoserM.HenigJ. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 145-158.
55.
LadkyM.PetersonS. S. (2008). Successful practices for immigrant parent involvement: An Ontario perspective. Multicultural Perspectives, 10(2), 82-89.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
58.
LevinH. M. (1998). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 373-392.
59.
MattinglyD. J.PrislinR.McKenzieT. L.RodriguezJ. L.KayzarB. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72, 549-576.
60.
Michigan Center for Educational Performance and Information. (2014). Where Detroit residents attend school, fall 2014-2015. Lansing: Michigan Department of Education.
61.
MirelJ. (1999). The rise and fall of an urban school system: Detroit, 1907-81. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62.
MironG. (2010). Public charter schools: A great value for Ohio’s public education system. In WelnerK. G.HincheyP.MolnarA.WeitzmanD. (Eds.), Think tank research quality: Lessons for policymakers, the media, and the public (pp. 165-178). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
63.
MironG.GulosinoC. (2013). Profiles of for-profit and nonprofit education management organizations: Fourteenth edition, 2011-2012. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
64.
MironG.UrschelJ. L.AguilarY.MayraA.DaileyB. (2012). Profiles of for-profit and nonprofit education management organizations: Thirteenth annual report, 2010-2011. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
65.
MowenT. J. (2013). Parental Involvement in school and the role of school security measures. Education and Urban Society, 47, 830-848.
66.
NathanJ. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
67.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2014). Estimated number of public charter schools and students 2013-2014. Available from http://www.publiccharters.org/
68.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).
69.
Olson-BealH.HendryP. (2012). The ironies of school choice: Empowering parents and reconceptualizing public education. American Journal of Education, 118, 521-550.
70.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality (The Civil Rights Project). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
71.
RahY.ChoiS.NguyễnT. S. T. (2009). Building bridges between refugee parents and schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 347-365.
72.
RenzulliL. A.EvansL. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and white flight. Social Problems, 52, 398-418.
73.
ReynoldsA. D.CreaT. M.MedinaF. J.DegnanE.McRoyR. (2015). A mixed-methods case study of parent involvement in an urban high school serving minority students. Urban Education, 50, 750-775.
RobinsonK.HarrisA. (2014). The broken compass: Parental involvement with children’s education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76.
RoseB. A.SteinM. L. (2014). Mechanisms for teacher outreach to parents in charter and traditional public schools. Journal of School Choice, 8, 589-617.
77.
SchlossbergM.GreeneJ.PhillipsP. P.JohnsonB.ParkerB. (2006). School trips: Effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 337-346.
78.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
ShatkinG.GershbergA. I. (2007). Empowering parents and building communities: The role of school-based councils in educational governance and accountability. Urban Education, 42, 582-615.
80.
ShiffmanC. D. (2013). The Juggling Act Navigating Parent Involvement in the Welfare Reform Era. Educational Policy, 27(1), 64-91.
81.
SmithJ. G. (2006). Parental involvement in education among low-income families: A case study. School Community Journal, 16, 43-56.
82.
SmithJ.WohlstetterP.KuzinC. A.De PedroK. (2011). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: New strategies for increasing participation. School Community Journal, 21, 71-94.
83.
SolomonL. D. (2013). Detroit: Three pathways to revitalization. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
84.
SteinM.GoldringE.SmrekarC. (2012). Dynamics of parent involvement in urban charter schools: Parents’ perceptions, principals’ expectations, and student achievement. In AuerbachS. (Ed.), School leadership for authentic family and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice (pp. 2123-2232). New York, NY: Routledge.
85.
StewartT.WolfP. J. (2012). Understanding school shoppers in Detroit. Detroit, MI: Qwaku & Associates for Michigan Future.
86.
SugrueT. J. (2014). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
87.
TeskeP.SchneiderM.BuckleyJ.ClarkS. (2000). Does Charter School competition improve traditional public schools? (Civic report 10). New York: Center for Civic Edu- cation at the Manhattan Institute.
88.
TiekenM. C. (2009). The right people. In MersethK. K. (Ed.), Inside Urban Charter Schools: Promising practices and strategies in five high-performing schools. (pp. 149-170). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
89.
TuzzoloE.HewittD. T. (2006). Rebuilding inequity: The re-emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90(2), 59-68.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Parent and family involvement in education, from the National Household Education Surveys program of 2012. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013028rev.pdf
95.
WangM. T.HillN. E.HofkensT. (2014). Parental involvement and African American and European American adolescents’ academic, behavioral, and emotional development in secondary school. Child Development, 85, 2151-2168.
