In this article, I employ sociocultural theory to analyze the learning to teach process of two novice teachers enrolled in one Urban Teacher Residency (UTR). Findings show that Genesis and Jackie were differentially drawing on programmatic, disciplinary, relational, experiential, and dispositional resources as they learned to teach in an urban context. I show that programmatic resources of supervision and classroom management requirements (i.e., Doug Lemov’s Teach Like a Champion) not only differentially influenced teachers’ learning and development but also differentially impacted the development of trust with students.
BerryB. (2005). The future of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 272-278.
2.
BerryB.MontgomeryD.SnyderJ. (2009). Urban teacher residency models and institutes of higher education: Implications for teacher preparation. Carrboro, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
3.
BickmoreS.SmagorinskyP.O-Donnell-AllenC. (2005). Tensions between traditions: The role of contexts in learning to teach. English Education, 38, 23-52.
4.
BoggessL. B. (2010). Tailoring new urban teachers for character and activism. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 65-95.
5.
BritzmanD. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
BuehlerJ.GereA. R.DallavisC.HavilandV. S. (2009). Normalizing the fraughtness: How emotion, race, and school context complicate cultural competence. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 408-418.
7.
EngeströmY. (1986). The zone of proximal development as the basic category of educational psychology. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 8(1), 23-42.
8.
EngeströmY.MiettinenR. (1999). Introduction. In EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamakiR. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013.
10.
Feiman-NemserS.RemillardJ. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. In MurrayF. (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 63-91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
GatlinD. (2009). A pluralistic approach to the revitalization of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 469-477.
12.
GattiL. (2014). Negotiating conflicting frames of experience: Learning to teach in an urban teacher residency. In EllisV.OrchardJ. (Eds.), Learning teaching from experience: Multiple perspectives and international contexts (pp. 207-222). London, England: Bloomsbury.
13.
GattiL. (2016). Toward a framework of resources for learning to teach: Rethinking U.S. teacher preparation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
GattiL.CatalanoT. (2015). The business of learning to teach: A critical metaphor analysis of one teacher’s journey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 149-160.
15.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
16.
HammernessK.MatskoK. K. (2013). When context has content: A case study of new teacher induction in the University of Chicago’s Urban Teacher Education Program. Urban Education, 48, 557-584.
17.
JohnsonA. W. (2012). “Turnaround” as shock therapy: Race, neoliberalism, and school reform. Urban Education, 48, 232-256.
18.
KerosuoH.EngeströmY. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 345-351.
19.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 21-34.
20.
LemovD. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
21.
LortieD. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press (Original work published 1975)
22.
LowensteinD. L. (2009). The work of multicultural teacher education: Reconceptulaizing white teacher candidates as learners. Review of Educational Research, 1, 163-196.
23.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
MilnerH. R. (2006). Preservice teachers’ learning about cultural and racial diversity: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 41, 343-375.
25.
MilnerH. R.TenoreF. B. (2010). Classroom management in diverse classrooms. Urban Education, 45, 560-603.
26.
PapayJ.WestM.FullertonJ.KaneT. (2012). Does an urban teacher residency increase student achievement? Early evidence from Boston. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 413-434.
27.
PeckC.ReitzugU. C. (2014). School turnaround fever: The paradoxes of a historical practice promoted as a new reform. Urban Education, 49, 8-38.
28.
SmagorinskyP.CookL. S.MooreC.JacksonA.FryP. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 8-24.
29.
StakeR. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
30.
TrujilloT.ReneeM. (2015). Irrational exuberance for market-based reform: How federal turnaround policies thwart democratic schooling. Teachers College Record, 117, 1-34.
31.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
32.
ZeichnerK. M.SandovalC. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the U.S.: The role of the new schools venture fund. Teachers College Record, 117(6). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
