Despite being academically unqualified for admission to the University of Texas at Austin, Abigail Fisher, a White female, argued that she was not admitted due to the university’s diversity policy. In addition to framing postsecondary admissions as a zero-sum phenomenon, Ms. Fisher intentionally frames students of color who are admitted to the University of Texas at Austin as academically unqualified. The purpose of this article is to examine Ms. Fisher’s arguments against the University of Texas’ diversity policy as presented in Fisher v. University of Texas from a critical race theoretical perspective. In addition to obfuscating the fact that admission to the top colleges and universities in the United States has become more competitive, Ms. Fisher’s anti-diversity arguments are also consistent with a racial ideology and socially conservative agenda that frames people of color as undeserving of the opportunities traditionally associated with White people. The goal of this article is not only to situate Fisher v. University of Texas as a strategic project of Whiteness, but to also discuss what critical race theory can still teach scholars and researchers concerned with racial inequality in education.
AndersonT. H. (2004). The pursuit of fairness: A history of affirmative action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BakerL. D. (1998). From savage to Negro: Anthropology and the construction of race, 1896–1954. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BellD. (1979). Introduction: Awakening after Bakke. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 14, 1-6.
4.
BellD. (1987). And we are not saved: The elusive quest for racial justice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2003). Racism with racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
Brief for Respondents. (2011). Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, No. 11-345.
7.
Brief in Opposition. (2011). Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, No. 11-345.
8.
BrodinM. S. (2014). The fraudulent case against affirmative action: The untold story behind Fisher v. University of Texas. Buffalo Law Review, 62, 237-290.
9.
BrownA. L.DonnorJ. K. (2011). Toward a new narrative on Black males, education, and public policy. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14, 17-32.
10.
BrownM. K.CarnoyM.CurrieE.DusterT.OppenheimerD. B.ShultzM. M.WellmanD. (2003). Whitewashing race: The myth of color-blind society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
ChapmanT. K. (2005). Pedaling backward: Reflections of Plessy and Brown in the Rockford Public Schools’ de jure desegregation efforts. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 29-44.
13.
CokorinosL. (2003). The assault on diversity: An organized challenge to racial and gender justice. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
14.
CrenshawK. W. (2011). Twenty years of critical race theory: Looking back to move forward. Connecticut Law Review, 43, 1253-1352.
15.
CrenshawK. W.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (1995). Introduction. In CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. xiii-xxxii). New York, NY: The New Press.
16.
DeCuirJ.DixsonA. D. (2004). “So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there”: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26-31.
17.
DonnorJ. K. (2005). Towards an interest-convergence in the education of African American football student athletes in major college sports. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 45-68.
18.
DonnorJ. K. (2015). Who’s qualified? Seeing race in colorblind times: Lessons from Fisher v. University of Texas. National Society for the Study of Education, 114(2), 185-203.
19.
EdsallT. B.EdsallM. D. (1992). Chain reaction: The impact of race, rights, and taxes on American politics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
20.
FeaginJ. R. (2013). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
FlaggB. J. (1998). Was blind, but now I see: White race consciousness and the law. New York: New York University Press.
22.
FonerE. (1998). The story of American freedom. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
23.
FredricksonG. M. (1988). The arrogance of race: Historical perspectives on slavery, racism, and social inequality. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
24.
FreemanA. D. (1988). Racism, rights and the quest for equality of opportunity: A critical legal essay. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 23, 295-392.
25.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
26.
HarrisC. I. (2001). Equal treatment and the reproduction of inequality. Fordham Law Review, 69, 1753-1783.
27.
HarrisC. I. (2002). Critical race studies: An introduction. UCLA Law Review, 49, 1215-1239.
28.
JackmanM. R. (1996). Individualism, self-interest, and white racism. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 760-767.
29.
KatznelsonI. (2005). When affirmative action was White: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
30.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal for Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 7-24.
31.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 257-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2013). Critical race theory: What it is not! In LynnM.DixsonA. D. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 34-47). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47-68.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. J.DonnorJ. K. (2005). Waiting for the call: The moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 279-301). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
LakoffG. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
36.
LiuG. (2002). The causation fallacy: Bakke and the basic arithmetic of selective admissions. Michigan Law Review, 100, 1045-1107.
37.
LopezI. H. (1996). White by law: The legal construction of race. New York: New York University Press.
38.
LopezI. H. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC. R.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. W. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40.
McDonnellL. M.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.
41.
O’ConnorA. (2001). Poverty knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth-century U.S. history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
ParkerL. (2015). Critical race theory in education and qualitative inquiry: What each has to offer each other now?Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 199-205.
43.
ParkerL.StovallD. O. (2004). Actions following words: Critical race theory connects to critical pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 167-182.
44.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari. (2011). Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, No. 11-345.
45.
QuadagnoJ. (1994). The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
RobinC. (2011). The reactionary mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
RoithmayrD. (2014). Reproducing racism: How everyday choices lock in White advantage. New York: New York University Press.
48.
SchmidtP. (2007). Color and money: How rich White kids are winning the war over college affirmative action. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347.
50.
SkrentnyJ. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture, and justice in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
SolorzanoD.YossoT. (2001). Critical race and LatCrit theory and method: Counter-storytelling. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 471-495.
52.
TateW. F. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22, 195-247.
WestC. (1995). Foreword. In CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. xi-xii). New York, NY: The New Press.
59.
ZuberiT.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
