In the last 20 years, the U.S. higher education system has witnessed the tremendous growth of for-profit colleges and universities (FPCUs). In fact, FPCUs have quickly become the fastest growing segment of postsecondary education. With innovative practices and alternative delivery of educational services, FPCUs have established a considerable pipeline for minority students, especially Blacks. This article presents research and literature on the phenomenon of the rising FPCU and what it represents for racial minorities, especially Black males. Recommendations for practice and policy for Black male student success are offered.
AbrahamK. G.ClarkM. A. (2006). Financial aid and students’ college decisions: Evidence from the District of Columbia Tuition Assistance Grant Program. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 578-610.
2.
AlwinD.OttoL. (1977). High school context effects on aspiration. Sociology of Education, 50, 259-273.
3.
ArbonaC.NoraA. (2004). Predicting college attainment of Hispanic students: Individual, institutional, and environmental factors. Review of Higher Education, 30, 247-270.
4.
BaileyT.BadwayN.GumportP. J. (2001). For-profit higher education and community colleges (Technical report, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
BennettD. L.LucchesiA. R.VedderR. K. (2010). For-profit higher education: Growth, innovation, and regulation. Washington, DC: Center for College Afford-ability and Productivity.
7.
BergG. A. (2005). Reform higher education with capitalism? Doing good and making money at for-profit universities. Change, 37, 28-34.
BoundJ.LovenheimM. F.TurnerS. (2010). Why have college completion rates declined? An analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 129-157.
10.
BrennemanD. W.PusserB.TurnerS. E. (2006). Earnings from learning: The rise of for-profit universities. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
11.
CabreraA. F.LaNasaS. M. (2000). Understanding the college choice of disadvantaged students: New directions for institutional research, No. 107. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
CampaignD. A.HosslerD. (1998). How do loans affect the educational decisions of students? Access, aspirations, college choice, and persistence. In FosseyR.BatemanM. (Eds.), Condemning students to debt: College loans and public policy (pp. 85-104). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
ChickeringA. W.PetersK.PalmerR. T. (2006). Assessing the impact of the Morgan Male Initiative on Leadership and Excellence (MILE). Baltimore, MD: Morgan State University.
ComarchoC. (2009). African American and Hispanic male perceptions of effective and ineffective retention strategies, and the implications for undergraduate persistence in a for-profit commuter university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton.
19.
CunninghamA. F.SantiagoD. (2008). Student aversion top borrowing: Who borrows and who doesn’t. Washington, DC: Institution of Higher Education Policy.
20.
DemingD.ClaudiaG.KatzL. F. (2012). The for-profit postsecondary school sector: Nimble critters or agile predators?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 139-164.
21.
DillD. D. (2005). The public good, the public interest, and public higher education. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/docs/PublicvsPrivate.pdf
22.
DiMariaF. (2007, September). For-profits and career colleges popular with minorities. The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, pp. 20-23.
23.
Diverse: Issues in Higher Education. (2010). Top 100 producers of minority degrees 2010. Fairfax, VA: Cox, Mathews, and Associates, Inc.
24.
Donini-LenhoffF. G.BrothertonS. E. (2010). Racial-ethnic diversity in allied health: The continuing challenge. Journal of Allied Health, 39, 104-109.
FarrellE. F. (2003, October). Public college tuition rise is largest in three decades. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, 1A.
27.
FieldK. (2011, May8). Faculty at for-profits allege pressure to keep students enrolled: Instructors say they have been encouraged to dumb down courses and change failing grades. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Pawns-in-the-For-Profit/127424/
28.
FlintT. A. (1993). Early awareness of college financial aid: Does it expand choice?Review of Higher Education, 16, 309-327.
29.
FloydC. E. (2005). For profit degree-granting colleges: Who are these guys and what do they mean for students, traditional institutions, and public policy? In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 539-589). Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer.
30.
Fries-BrittS. L.TurnerB. (2002). Uneven stories: Successful Black collegians at a Black and a White campus. Review of Higher Education, 25, 315-330.
31.
GartenE. D. (2001). Online and for-profit graduate education: A challenge of understanding and accommodation for academic librarianship. Technical Services Quarterly, 19(3), 1-20.
32.
GriffithA.RaskK. (2007). The influence of the U.S. News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review, 26, 244-255.
33.
HardemanC.LeeC.MayesM.Perez-VelezK. (2008). Exploring the special needs of minority males (CNS 572). The College Student Experience. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cns/3
HarperS. R. (2005). Leading the way: Inside the experience of high-achieving African American male students. About Campus, 10(1), 8-15.
36.
HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (2007). Student organizations as venues for Black identity expression and development among African American male student leaders. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 127-144.
37.
HarveyW. B. (2003). Minorities in higher education: Twentieth annual status report 2002-2003. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
38.
HentschkeG. C.LechugaV. M.TierneyW. G. (2010). For-profit colleges and universities: Their markets, regulation, performance, and place in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
39.
HorvatE. M. (1996, November). Boundaries of belonging and postsecondary access: African American students and college choice decision-making in social context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Memphis, TN.
40.
HosslerD.BraxtonJ.CoopersmithG. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 231-288). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
41.
HosslerD.GallagherK. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62, 207-221.
42.
IlohC. (2014). A critical comparison of website marketing at for-profit colleges & community colleges. National Association of Student Affairs Professionals Journal, 15(2), 91-106.
43.
IlohC.TierneyW. G. (2013). A comparison of for-profit and community colleges’ admissions practices. College and University, 88, 2-12.
44.
IlohC.ToldsonI. A. (2013). Black students in 21st century higher education: A closer look at for-profit and community colleges. Journal of Negro Education, 82, 205-212.
45.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. (2011). Glossary. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
46.
JacksonG. (1982). Public efficiency and private choice in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 237-247.
KaneT. (2007). Evaluating the impact of the DC Tuition Assistance Grant Program. Journal of Human Resources, 42, 555-582.
49.
KellyK. (2001). Meeting needs and making profits: The rise of the for-profit degree granting institution. Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED456689.pdf
50.
Kelpe KernC. W. (2000). College choice influences: Urban high school students respond. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24, 487-495.
51.
KinserK. (2005). A profile of regionally accredited for-profit institutions of higher education. In PusserB. (Ed.), New Directions for Higher Education, No. 129: Arenas of entrepreneurship: Where nonprofit and for-profit institutions compete (pp. 69-84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52.
KinserK. (2006). From main street to wall street: The transformation of for-profit higher education (ASHE Higher Education Report) volume 31 (pp. 1-155). Las Vegas, NV: Jossey-Bass.
53.
KirpD. L. (2003). Education for-profit. Public Interest, 152, 100-106.
54.
KotlerP.FoxK. F. (1985). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
LechugaV. M. (2008). Assessment, knowledge, and customer service: Contextualizing faculty work at for-profit colleges and universities. Review of Higher Education, 31, 287-307.
LewisA. C. (2008). Student loan defaults and career colleges. Tech Directions, 67(8), 6.
58.
LittenL. (1982). Different strokes in the applicant pool: Some refinements in a model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education, 53, 383-402.
59.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
60.
MullinC. M. (2010, November). Just how similar? Community colleges and the for-profit sector (Policy Brief 2010-04PBL). Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.
61.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Low income students: Who they are and how they pay for their education. Washington, DC: Author.
62.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Graduation rates. Washington, DC: Author.
63.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities. Washington, DC: Author.
64.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Integrated postsecondary education data system. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/
65.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The condition of education 2014: Institutional retention and graduation rates for undergraduate students. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=40
66.
PalmerR. T.GasmanM. (2008). It takes a village to raise a child: The role of social capital in promoting success for African American men at a Black college. Journal of College Student Development, 49(1), 52-70.
67.
PalmerR. T.MarambaD. C.DancyT. E. (2013). The magnificent “MILE”: Impacting Black male retention and persistence at an HBCU. Journal of College Student Retention, 15(1), 65-72.
68.
PalmerR. T.StrayhornT. (2008). Mastering one’s own Fate: Non-cognitive factors associated with the success of African American males at an HBCU. National Association of Student Affairs Professionals Journal, 11(1), 126-143.
69.
PalmerR. T.YoungE. M. (2009). Determined to succeed: Salient factors that foster academic success for academically unprepared Black males at a Black college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(4), 465-482.
70.
PaulsenM. B.St.JohnE. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 189-239.
71.
PekowC. (2007). For-profit schools popular destination for minorities. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 23(26), 19-19.
72.
PernaL. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 117-141.
73.
PhippsR.HarrisonK.MerisotisJ. (1999). Students at private, for-profit institutions (NCES Report No. 2000-175). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
74.
PusserB.TurnerS. E. (2004). Nonprofit and for-profit governance in higher education. In EhrenbergR. G. (Ed.), Governing academia (pp. 235-527), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
75.
RhodesF. T. (2001). The role of the American University. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
76.
RuchR. S. (2001). Higher Ed, Inc.: The rise of the for-profit university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
SheldonC. Q. (2009). Predictors of transfer to 4-year, for-profit institutions. Community College Review, 37, 34-52.
79.
SilberJ. M. (2006, February). Equity research: Education and training. New York, NY: U.S. BMO Capital Markets.
80.
SnyderT.HoffmanC. (2003). Digest of education statistics (NCES Report No. 2003060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
81.
SpradleyP. (2001). Strategies for educating the adult black male in college (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED464524). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
82.
StageE. K.HosslerD. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education, 30, 301-315.
83.
StrayhornT. L.BlakewoodA. M.DeVitaJ. M. (2008). Factors affecting the college choice and retention of African American gay male undergraduates. NASAP Journal, 45, 88-108.
TierneyW. G.HentschkeG. C. (2007). New players, different game: Understanding the rise of for-profit colleges and universities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
86.
ToldsonI. A.LewisC. W. (2012). Challenge the status quo: Academic success among school-age African American males. Washington, DC: Congressional Black Caucus Foundation.
87.
WilsonR. (February, 2010). The profit motive: For-profit colleges change higher education’s landscape: Nimble companies gain a fast-growing share of enrollments. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(22), A1-A19.
