White Canadian teacher candidates are brought into direct dialogue with urban high school students through a yearlong immersion in a high school with a “demonized” image in the broader community. Interviews with students reveal experiences of school as “my safe space” and the predominance of a student culture not characterized by resistance, but by a positive experience of school as an autonomous relational space. We argue that attention to student voices through extended immersion in urban high schools enables teacher candidates to experience schools as uniquely situated spaces and disrupts the tendency to essentialize urban students and their schools.
AminA. (2007). Re-thinking the urban social. City, 11, 100-114.
2.
BleicherE. (2011). Parsing the language of racism and relief: Effects of a short-term urban field placement on teacher candidates’ perceptions of culturally diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1170-1178.
3.
Carter AndrewsD. J. (2009). “The hardest thing to turn from”: The effects of service-learning on preparing urban educators. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 272-293.
4.
Cook-SatherA. (2002). Authorising students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3-14.
5.
Cook-SatherA. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student Voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 359-390.
6.
Cook-SatherA. (2009). “I am not afraid to listen”: Prospective teachers learning from students. Theory Ιnto Practice, 48, 176-183.
DanielB.-J. (2007). Developing educational collectives and networks: Moving beyond the boundaries of “community” in urban education. In SolomonR. P.SekayiD. N. R. (Eds.), Urban teacher education and teaching: Innovative practices for diversity and social justice (pp. 31-47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
DanielB.-J. (2010). Reimagining the urban: A Canadian perspective. Urban Education, 45, 822-839.
10.
del Prado HillP.FriedlandE. S.PhelpsS. (2012). How teacher candidates’ perceptions of urban students are influenced by field experiences: A review of the literature. Action in Teacher Education, 34, 77-96.
11.
DonnellK. (2007). Getting to we: Developing a transformative urban teaching practice. Urban Education, 42, 223-249.
12.
EgboB. (2011). What should preservice teachers know about race and diversity? Exploring a critical knowledge-base for teaching in 21st century Canadian classrooms. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 6(2), 23-37.
13.
FieldingM. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123-141.
14.
FieldingM. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 295-311.
15.
FieldingM. (2007). Jean Rudduck (1937–2007) “Carving a new order of experience”: A preliminary appreciation of the work of Jean Rudduck in the field of student voice. Educational Action Research, 15, 323-336.
16.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
17.
GulsonK. N. (2011). Education policy, space and the city: Markets and the (in)visibility of race. New York, NY: Routledge.
HollingworthS.ArcherL. (2010). Urban schools as urban places: School reputation, children’s identities and engagement with education in London. Urban Studies, 47, 584-603.
20.
KaneR.MawN. (2005). Making sense of learning at secondary school: Involving students to improve teaching practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 311-322.
21.
KiddW. (2012). Relational agency and pre-service trainee teachers: Using student voice to frame teacher education pedagogy. Management in Education, 26, 120-129.
22.
LanasM.CorbettM. (2011). Disaggregating student resistances: Analyzing what students pursue with challenging agency. Young, 19, 417-434.
23.
LoughranJ. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London, England: Routledge.
24.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. London, England: Sage.
RudduckJ. (2006). The past, the papers and the project. Educational Review, 58, 131-143.
33.
RudduckJ. (2007). Student voice, student engagement, and school reform. In ThiessenD.Cook-SatherA. (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 587-610). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
34.
RudduckJ.FlutterJ. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: “Carving a new order of experience.”Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75-89.
35.
SleeterC.OwuorJ. (2011). Research on the impact of teacher preparation to teach diverse students: The research we have and the research we need. Action in Teacher Education, 33, 524-536.
36.
SmallerH. (2007). Moving beyond institutional boundaries in inner-city teacher preparation. In SolomonR. P.SekayiD. N. R. (Eds.), Urban teacher education and teaching: Innovative practices for diversity and social justice (pp. 89-108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
ThriftN. (1997). “Us” and “them”: Re-imagining places, re-imagining identities. In MackayH. (Ed.), Consumption and everyday life (pp. 159-212). London, England: Sage.
38.
ThriftN. (2004). Summoning life. In ClokeP.CrangP.GoodwinM. (Eds.), Envisioning human geography (pp. 81-103). London, England: Edward Arnold.
39.
WatsonD. (2012). Norming suburban: How teachers talk about race without using race words. Urban Education, 47, 983-1004.
40.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89-99.
