This article investigates interactional processes by which students from non-dominant groups develop academic identities within schools that privilege the dominant group. It draws on an ethnographic study of an urban magnet school, focusing on a discourse analysis of conversations between 3 eighth-grade girls. Findings include that students supported their academic identities through strategically establishing symbolic boundaries between academic content and the standards by which they were judged. Overall, this study explores the ways in which students exercise agency as they develop symbolic boundaries that are more complex than the binary “white” versus “nonwhite” to attain identity-related goals.
Ainsworth-DarnellJ. W.DowneyD. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536-553.
2.
BoykinA. W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children. In NeisserU. (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children (pp. 57-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
CarterD. (2007). Why the Black kids sit together at the stairs: The role of identity-affirming counter-spaces in a predominantly White high school. The Journal of Negro Education, 76, 542-554.
4.
CarterP. L. (2006). Straddling boundaries: Identity, culture, and school. Sociology of Education, 79, 304-328.
5.
CrouseJ.TrusheimD. (1988). The case against the SAT. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
DaviesB.HarreR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 46-62.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
FordD. Y.GranthamT. C.WhitingG. W. (2008). Another look at the achievement gap: Learning from the experiences of gifted black students. Urban Education, 43, 216-239.
10.
FordhamS. (2008). Beyond capital high: On dual citizenship and the strange career of “acting white.”Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 39, 227-246.
11.
FordhamS.OgbuJ. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of “acting white.”Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
12.
GeeJ. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 195-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
GubaE.LincolnY. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
HarrisA. (2011). Kids don’t want to fail: Oppositional culture and the Black White achievement gap. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HilliardA. G. (1990). Limitations of current academic achievement measures. In LomoteyK. (Ed.), Going to school: The African American experience (pp. 143-162). Albany: State University of New York Press.
16.
HorvatE. M.LewisK. S. (2003). Reassessing the “burden of ‘acting white’”: The importance of peer groups in managing academic success. Sociology of Education, 76, 265-280.
17.
KinlochV. (2007). “The White-ification of the hood”: Power, politics, and youth performing narratives of community. Language Arts, 85, 61-68.
18.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.
19.
LamontM.MolnárV. (2002). The study of boundaries across the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167-195.
20.
O’ConnorC. (1999). Race, class, and gender in America: Narratives of opportunity among low-income African American youths. Sociology of Education, 72, 137-154.
PattonM. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London, England: Sage.
23.
ScantleburyK. (2005). Meeting the needs and adapting to the capital of a Queen Mother and an Ol’ Head: Gender equity in urban high school science. In TobinK.ElmeskyR.SeilerG. (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers (pp. 201-212). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
SpencerM. B.NollE.StoltzfusJ.HarpalaniV. (2001). Identity and school adjustment: Revisiting the “acting White” assumption. Educational Psychologist, 36, 21-30.
26.
TysonK. (2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, Black students and acting White after Brown. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
TysonK.DarityW.CastellinoD. (2005). It’s not “a Black thing”: Understanding the burden of acting White and other dilemmas of high achievement. American Sociological Review, 70, 582-605.
28.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon.
29.
WorthamS. (1996). Deictic mapping. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 331-348.
30.
WorthamS. (2001). Narratives in action. New York, NY: Teachers College.
