The study examines teachers’ trust in their role partners and its relation to their intention to continue teaching at schools with high and low socioeconomic composition. Based on a questionnaire completed by 149 Israeli teachers in in-service training programs, and interviews with 10 teachers, it was found that teachers attribute different social roles to trust depending on the school’s social composition. In schools with low socioeconomic composition, teachers highly trusted colleagues. In schools with high socioeconomic composition, teachers trusted clients. Trust was linked to teachers’ plans to continue teaching. The implications of these findings regarding teachers’ work are discussed.
AdamsC. M. (2008). Building trust in schools: A review of the empirical evidence. In HoyW. K.DiPaolaM. (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 29-54). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age.
2.
AdamsC. M.ForsythP. B.MitchellR. M. (2009). The formation of parent-school trust: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 4-33.
3.
Addi-RaccahA. (2005). Gender and teachers’ attrition: The occupational destination of former teachers. Sex Roles, 53, 739-753.
4.
Addi-RaccahA.EinhornR. (2009). School governance and teachers’ attitudes to parents’ involvement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 805-813.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. W. (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27,17-40.
7.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2008). What keeps good teachers in the classroom?Understanding and reducing teacher turnover [Issue brief]. Retrieved from http://www.all4ed.org/files/TeachTurn.pdf.
8.
AvisJ. (2003). Re-thinking trust in a performative culture: The case of education. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 315-332.
9.
BallS. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215-228.
10.
BallS. J. (2006). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. In BallStephen J. (Ed.), Education policy and social class (pp. 144-155). London and New York: Routledge.
11.
BotteryM. (2003). The management and mismanagement of trust. Educational Management & Administration, 31, 245-261.
12.
BotteryM. (2004). The challenges of educational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
BotteryM. (2005).Trust: Its importance for educators. Management in Education, 18, 6-10.
14.
BourdieuP. (2006). The forms of capital. In LauderH.BrownP.DillaboughJ. A.HalseyA. H. (Eds.), Education, globalization, and social change (pp. 105-118). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: Chicago Press.
16.
BrantlingerE. (2003). Dividing classes: How middle class negotiates and rationalizes school resources. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
17.
BrewsterC.RailsbackJ. (2003). Building trusting relations for school improvements: Implications for principals and teachers. Portland, OR: North West Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/463
18.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
19.
CoddJ. (2005). Teachers as “managed professionals” in the global education industry: The New Zealand experience. Educational Review, 57, 193-206.
20.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl. 95). S95-S120.
21.
ColemanJ. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
ComptonM.WeinerL. (Eds.). (2008). The global assault on teaching, teachers, and their union. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
24.
CreswellJ. W.Plano-ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
DalyA. J. (2009). Rigid response in an age of accountability: The potential of leadership and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 168-216.
26.
EdmondsonJ.D’UrsoA. (2009). Considering alternatives for federal education policy in the United States: A critical perspective on “No Child Left Behind.”Critical Studies in Education, 50(1), 79-91.
27.
EvettsJ. (2006). Introduction—Trust and professionalism: Challenges and occupational changes. Current Sociology, 54, 515-531.
28.
ForsythP. B. (2008). The empirical consequences of school trust. In HoyW. K.DiPaolaM. (Eds.), Improving schools: Studies in leadership and culture (pp. 1-27). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
29.
ForsythP. B.AdamsC. M. (2008a, March). School effects and relational trust measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
30.
ForsythP. B.AdamsC. M. (2008b, April). Control or trust: Parents and teachers cooperating. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
31.
ForsythP. B.LauraL. B.BarnesL. L. B.AdamsC. (2006). Trust-effectiveness patterns in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(2), 122-141.
GiddensA. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
GoddardR. D.SalloumS. J.BerebitskyD. (2009). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between poverty, racial composition, and academic achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 292-311.
37.
GoddardR. D.Tschannen-MoranM.HoyW. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3-17.
38.
GonenS. (2009). Centralization and decentralization: Principals’ perceptions of the role of superintendent and local authority (Unpublished master’s thesis). School of Education, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
39.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
40.
Groundwater-SmithS.SachsJ. (2002). The activist professional and the reinstatement of trust. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 341-358.
41.
GuarinoC. M.SantibañezL.DaleyG. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and Retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 173-208.
42.
GuinK. (2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42), 1-30. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n42/
43.
HelsbyG. (1999). Changing teachers’ work. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
44.
HickoxM.MooreR. (1992). Education and post-Fordism: A new correspondence. In BrownP.LauderH. (Eds.), Education for economic survival (pp. 95-116). London, UK: Routledge.
45.
HirschE.EmerickS. (with ChurchK.FullerE.) (2007). Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions: A report on the 2006 North Carolina teacher working conditions survey. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved from http://www.teachingquality.org/pdfs/twcnc2006.pdf
46.
HoyW.TartarJ. C.WitkoskieL. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 38-45.
47.
HoyW. K.Tschannen-MoranM. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 84-208.
48.
HubertyC. J. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 156-171
49.
HubertyC. J. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
50.
HwangY. R.ChangC. W.KuoC. (2007, April9-13). Teacher status and turnover rate in the US and UK: Critical review from educators in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Annual American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL.
51.
InbarD. (2009). Developing sutonomy: The case of Israeli school system. In NirA. (Ed.) Centralization and School Empowement: From rethoric to practice (pp. 59-78). New York, NY: Nova Biomedical Books.
52.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
53.
IngersollR. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?A research report cosponsored by the Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and the Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Document Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
54.
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Statistical abstract of Israel 2010-No.61. Jerusalem, Israel: Author.
55.
JohnsonS. M. (2006). The workplace matters. Teacher quality, retention, and effectiveness (Working Paper). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
56.
KleckaW. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis. London, UK: SAGE.
57.
LachenbruchP. A. (1975). Discriminant analysis. New York, NY: Hafner.
58.
LevinJ.QuinnM. (2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban schools. New York, NY: New Teacher Project.
59.
LiebermanA.MillerL. (1999). Teachers: Transforming their world and their work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
60.
LuoY. (2002). Building trust in cross-cultural collaborations: Toward a contingency perspective. Journal of Management, 28, 669-694.
61.
MurphyJ. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
62.
OlsenB.SextonD. (2009). Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 8-4.
63.
PfadenhauerM. (2006). Crisis or decline? Problems of legitimisation and loss of trust in modern professionalism. Current Sociology, 54, 565-578.
64.
RoberstonS. L. (2000). A class act: Changing teachers’ work, the state, and globalization. Studies in Education/Politics. New York, NY: Falmer.
65.
RoberstonS. (2008). “Remaking the world”: Neoliberalisim and the transformation of educational and teachers’ labor. In ComptonM.WeinerL. (Eds.), The global assault on teaching, teachers, and their union (pp. 11-30). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
66.
RubioA.RosenblattZ. (1999). Job insecurity of Israeli secondary-school teachers: Sectoral effects. Journal of Educational Administration, 37, 139-158.
67.
SachsJ. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 77-95.
68.
SachsJ. (2003). Teacher activism: Mobilising the profession. Plenary Address to the British Educational Research Association Conference, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh.
69.
Shapira-LishchinskyO.RosenblattZ. (2009). Organizational ethics and teachers’ intent to leave: An integrative approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 725-758.
70.
SiisiäinenM. (2000, July5-8). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. The Third Sector: For what and for whom?Paper presented at ISTR Fourth International Conference, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
71.
SmythJ.DowA.HattamR.ReidA.ShacklockG. (2000). Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London, UK: Falmer.
TromanG. (2000). Teacher stress in the low-trust society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 331-353.
74.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 308-331.
75.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. CA: Jossey-Bass.
76.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217-247.
77.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyW. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547-593.
78.
Van MaeleD.Van HoutteM. (2009). Faculty trust and organizational school characteristics: An exploration across secondary schools in Flanders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 556-589.
79.
Van MaeleD.Van HoutteM. (2011). The quality of school life: Teacher-student trust relationships and the organizational school context. Social Indictors Research, 100, 85-100.
80.
VolanskyA. (2011). Shortage in teaching in Israel: From crises to challenge. In Shtz-OppenheimerM.MaskitD.ZilbershtromS. (Eds.), To be a teacher (pp. 23-53). Tel Aviv, Israel: Mofet (Hebrew).
81.
WahlstromK.LouisK. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458-495.
Weller-FerrisL. (1999). Working conditions. In MenloA.PoppletonP. (Eds.) The meanings of teaching (pp. 117-148). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
84.
WongJ. (2006). Control and professional development: Are teachers being deskilled or reskilled within the context of decentralization?Educational Studies, 32(1), 17-37.
