This instrumental case study reviews the 1994-2004 period of state financial oversight in East St. Louis, Illinois School District 189, with a secondary review of the initial years of NCLB implementation. Although the oversight panel’s fiscal management did generate financial stability, case findings indicate that its accountability processes did not result in sustained improvements in student achievement indicators despite anticipated links between the two in the panel’s reporting. Furthermore, the oversight process operated as a hierarchical structure without identification of cultural implications. Attention to culture and subsidiarity are indicated for future state–district partnerships oriented toward urban educational reform.
AdamsK. L.AdamsD. E. (2004). Urban education: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara: CA: ABC CLIO.
2.
AguilarA. (2004, June3). Court backs panel on architect. St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved from web.lexis-nexis.com/universe
3.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.
4.
BakerM.FooteM. (2006). Changing spaces: Urban school interrelationships and the impact of standards based reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 90-123.
5.
BarrR.DreebenR. (1983). How schools work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BooksS. (2005). Funding accountability: States, courts, and public responsibility. In ShapiroH. S.PurpelD. E. (Eds.), Critical social issues in American education (25-44), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BowlesS.LevineH. M. (1968). The determinants of scholastic achievement—An appraisal of some recent evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 3(1), 3-24.
8.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
9.
CarlsonD.GauseC. P. (Eds.). (2007). Keeping the promise: Essays on leadership, democracy, and education (Counterpoints: Studies in the postmodern theory of education). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
10.
CarnoyM.ElmoreR.SiskinL. S. (2003). The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
11.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA.WeinfieldF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12.
DonnellyM. (2008). Juvenile delinquency/truancy. Retrieved from EBSCO Research Starters Database.
FreireP. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach (MacedoD.KoikeD.OliveiraA., Trans.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
FullerB.WrightJ.GeisickiK.KangE. (2007). Gauging growth: How to judge No Child Left Behind?Educational Researcher, 36, 268-278.
18.
FullerE. J.JohnsonJ. F.Jr. (2001). Can state accountability systems drive improvements in school performance for children of color and children from low-income homes?Education and Urban Society, 33, 260-283.
19.
GamoranA.SecadaW. G.MarrettC. B. (2000). The organizational context of teaching and learning: Changing theoretical perspectives. In HallinanM. T. (Ed.), Handbook of research in the sociology of education (pp. 37-63). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
20.
GayG. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 613-629.
21.
GutmannA. (1999). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
hooksb. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.
Illinois State Board of Education (2002). Annual report to the state superintendent prepared by financial oversight panel for East St. Louis School District 189.
26.
Illinois State Board of Education. (2005). Annual Financial Report (Form 50-35), 1994-2004: East St. Louis District 189. Retrieved from ftp://ftpfinance.isbe.net/AFR
Lewis E. v. Spagnolo, 186 III. 2d 198, 710 N.E.2d 798 (Ill. 1999).
34.
LumpkinC. (2005). Combating racism through planning education: Lessons from the East St. Louis action research project. Planning Practice & Research, 13, 421-432.
35.
MarshallC.OlivaM. (2006). Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
McDermottK. A.JensenL. S. (2005). Dubious sovereignty: Federal conditions of aid and the No Child Left Behind Act. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 39-56.
38.
McLarenP. (2006). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
39.
McUsicM. S. (2004). The future of Brown v. Board of Education: Economic integration of the public schools. Harvard Law Review, 117, 1334-1377.
40.
MintropH. (2004). High-stakes accountability, state oversight, and educational equity. Teachers College Record, 106, 2128-2145.
41.
NelsonS. W.GuerraP. L. (2007). The journey to cultural proficiency is a sizeable challenge. Journal of Staff Development, 28(4), 59-62.
RegerJ. (2002). Organizational dynamics and construction of multiple feminist identities in the National Organization for Women. Gender & Society, 16, 710-727.
44.
RobinsL.RatcliffK. (1978). Long range outcomes associated with school truancy. Washington, DC: Public Health Service.
45.
RobyD. E. (2004). Research on school attendance and student achievement: A study of Ohio schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 28(1), 3-14.
46.
RoseboroD. L.O’MalleyM. P.HuntJ. (2006). Talking cents: Public discourse, state oversight, and democratic education in East St. Louis. Educational Studies, 40(1), 6-23.
47.
RosenbergJ. P.YatesP. M. (2007). Schematic representation of case study research designs. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 447-452.
48.
SederR. C. (2000). Balancing accountability and local control: State intervention for financial and academic stability (Policy Study No. 268). Los Angeles, CA: Reason Public Policy Institute.
49.
SkrlaL.ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.). (2004). Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
50.
SkrlaL.ScheurichJ. J.JohnsonJ. F.KoschoreckJ. W. (2001). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice?International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 237-260.
51.
SlatteryP. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
SpringJ. (2006). American education. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
53.
StakeR. (2000). Case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
StakeR. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
55.
SultanA. (2001, February22). Panel opposes giving money control to East St. Louis board; School board members act from personal, political interest, report says. St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved from web.lexis-nexis.com/universe
56.
The Conference Board, Inc., The Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Corporate Voices for Working Families, & The Society for Human Resource Management. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. workforce. New York, NY: Jill Casner-Lotto & Linda Barrington.
57.
UrrietaL.Jr. (2004). Assistencialism and the politics of high-stakes testing. Urban Review, 36, 211-226.
WankerW. P.ChristieK. (2005). State implementation of No Child Left Behind Act. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 57-72.
60.
WenglinskyH. (1997). How money matters: The effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(3), 221-237.
61.
WhiteM. D.MarshE. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45.
62.
WongK. K.NicoteraA. C. (2004). Brown v. Board of Education and the Coleman report: Social science research and the debate on educational equality. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(2), 122-135.
63.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research design: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
