This year-long ethnographic study explores one alternative school’s journey of creating a positive and collaborative learning community while negotiating through the disadvantages and marginalization within a school district and society at large. This study examined various aspects of school culture, including learning processes, discourses, relationships, and challenges the students and teachers face in schools. Participants discussed the importance of a flexible learning environment, strong relationships between students and teachers, while displaying a strong resistance toward authority. How schools must change to meet all students’ needs still remains a vital question.
AlexanderP. A.MurphyP. K. (1993). The research base for APA’s learner-centered psychological principals: Taking research on learning seriously: Implications for teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
2.
American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education. (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and the Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
3.
BettsA.ShkolnikJ. (2000). Key difficulties in identifying the effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 32-26.
4.
BradfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
BrownL. M.GilliganC. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CaineR. N. (2005). 12 brain/mind learning principles in action: The fieldbook for making connections, teaching, and the human brain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
7.
Carr-ChellmanA.BeaboutB.AlmeidaL.GursoyH. (2009). Idealized visions from behind bars: Prisoners’ perspectives on school change. International Journal of Educational Reform, 18, 155-172.
8.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
ClarkeJ. (2003). Personalized learning and personalized teaching. In DiMartinoJ.ClarkeJ.WolkD. (Eds.), Personalized learning: Preparing high school students to create their futures (pp. 69-86). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
10.
CoxT. (Ed.). (2000). Combating educational disadvantage meeting the needs of vulnerable children. London, UK: Falmer Press.
11.
DayC.VeenD. v.WalravenG. (1997). Children and youth at risk and urban education research, policy and practice. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
12.
DeeT. S.JacobB. A. (2006). Do high school exit exams influence educational attainment or labor market performance?(NBER Working Paper 12199). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12199
13.
DuffyF. M. (2010). A national framework of professional standards. In DuffyF. M. (Ed.), Dream! Create! Sustain!: Mastering the art & science of transforming school systems (pp. 231-251). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
FinnanC.ChasinG. (2007). Accelerating the learning of low achieving students the transformation of a dropout. Phil Delta Kappan, 88, 625-629.
15.
FincherR.SaundersP. (Eds.). (2001). Creating unequal futures? Rethinking poverty, inequality and disadvantage. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
16.
FoleyD. E. (1990). Learning capitalist culture deep in the heart of Tejas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
GoodladJ. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
18.
GriffinR. S. (1988). Underachievers in secondary school education off the mark. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
HabermasJ. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (McCarthyT., Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
20.
HargisC. H. (2006). Teaching low achieving and disadvantaged students (3rd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
JanoszM.ArchambaultI.PaganiL. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 21-40.
23.
JohnstonJ. H. (1992). Climate and culture as mediators of school values and collaborative behavior. In IrvinJ. L. (Ed.), Transforming middle level education perspectives and possibilities (pp. 244-274). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
24.
JohnstonK.RossH. (2001). Teaching to higher standards—From managing to imagining the purposes of education [Electronic version]. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10804
25.
JonesM. G.JonesB. D.HargroveT. Y. (2003). The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
KeefeJ. (2007). What is personalization?Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 217-223.
27.
LambertN. M.McCombsB. (Eds.). (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. (1999, January). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, gender, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 67, 37-53.
29.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (1983). The good high school portraits of character and culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30.
LewisA. (2001, October20). Abroad at home: The inescapable world. New York Times Magazine, p. A23.
31.
McCombsB.WhislerJ. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
MetzM. H. (1978). Classrooms and corridors the crisis of authority in desegregated secondary schools. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
NatrielloG.McDillE. L.PallasA. M. (1990). Schooling disadvantaged children racing against catastrophe. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
34.
NealD.SchanzenbachD. W. (2010). Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 263-283.
35.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track how schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
OakesJ. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12-21.
37.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
OgbuJ. U. (1974). The next generation: An ethnography of education in an urban neighborhood. New York, NY: Academic Press.
39.
OrmrodJ. E. (2008). Human learning (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
40.
PascoR. J. (2003). Capital and opportunity a critical ethnography of students at-risk. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
41.
ReigeluthC. M. (1994). The imperative for systemic change. In ReigeluthC. M.GarfinkleR. J. (Eds.), Systemic change in education (pp. 3-11). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
42.
ReigeluthC. M. (1997). Educational standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 202-206.
43.
RossH. (2003). Rethinking human vulnerability, security, and connection through relational theorizing. In NellesW. (Ed.), Comparative education, terrorism and human security: From critical pedagogy to peace building? (pp. 33-46). New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
RumbergerR.LimS. A. (2008, October). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research (California Dropout Research Project, Policy Brief 15). Santa Barbara: University of California, Gevirtz Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from www.slocounty.ca.gov/AssetFactory.aspx?did=18524
46.
SchlechtyP. C. (2002). Working on the work: An action plan for teachers, principals, and superintendents (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
SchorrL. B.SchorrD. (1988). Within our reach breaking the cycle of disadvantage. New York, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
48.
SengeP.Cambron-McCabeN.LucasT.SmithB.DuttonJ.KleinerA. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Currency.
49.
SennettR.CobbJ. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York, NY: Knopf.
50.
SlavinR. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
51.
SmythJ.McInerneyP. (2007). “Living on the edge”: A case of school reform working for disadvantaged young adolescents. Teachers College Record, 109, 1123-1170.
52.
SnyderI.AngusL.Sutherland-SmithW. (2002). Building equitable literate futures: Home and school computer-mediated literacy practices and disadvantage. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 367-383.
53.
ThomasR. M. (2005). High stakes testing: Coping with collateral damage. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
TomlinsonC. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, LA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
55.
TomlinsonC. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, LA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
