Public charter schools across the country are struggling to better serve a range of students with disabilities. Using the approach of a participatory evaluation, a K-8 college preparatory school community of teachers, administrators, parents, and students were better able to define those practices that impeded or supported a high-quality proactive integrated comprehensive service delivery model for all learners. In so doing, they were empowered to take their research findings and move to action through adapting their mission statement aligned with policy and procedures that would better enable the creation and implementation of a collaborative comprehensive integrated service delivery model.
Berends, M., Watral, C., Teasley, B., & Nicotera, A. ( 2006). Charter schools: What fosters growth and outcomes?Paper presented at the National Center on School Choice conference , Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
2.
Garaway, G. ( 2004). Participatory evaluation. In K. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 249-281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Mead, J.F. ( 2002). Determining charter schools’ responsibilities for children with disabilities: A guide through the legal labyrinth. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 11, 167-189.
4.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. ( 2007). Charter school achievement: What we know (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Rhim, L.M. ( 2007). Navigating special education in charter schools. Part I: Understanding legal roles and responsibilities. Chicago : National Association of Charter School Authorizers .
6.
Rhim, L.M., Ahearn, E., Lange, C., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2006). Charter schools’ special education infrastructure (Project Intersect Research Report No. 4). College Park : Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, University of Maryland-College Park.
7.
Rhim, L.M., Faukner, J., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2006). Access and accountability for students with disabilities in California charter schools ( Project Intersect Research Report No. 5). College Park: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, University of Maryland-College Park.
8.
Rhim, L.M., Lange, C., Ahearn, E., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2007). Survey of charter school operators (Project Intersect Research Report No. 7). College Park: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth, University of Maryland- College Park.
9.
Ryan, K.E. ( 2004). Serving the public interests in educational accountability . American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 443-460.
10.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Tilankarantna, S. ( 1990). A short note on participatory research. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.caledonia.org.uk/research.htm
